A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FAS, Sicilia Libertaria #461 - Referendum - We Don't Live by Work, We Fight (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:59:25 +0300


Much has been said about the referendums of June 8th and 9th, the four questions on work and the fifth on citizenship. On the left, as usual, there has been a profusion of admirable analyses of the defeat-which, however, always come after the fact-and equally admirable scrambling to avoid admitting that, with a turnout of 30.6%, nearly 20 percentage points below the quorum, one can only call it a disaster. However, we don't intend to mock "comrades who make mistakes" here; there have already been numerous such comments, and given the importance of the main issue, we don't feel like beating them up further. The question we will try to answer is this: why, if work is so central to people's lives, is it so much less so when it comes to fighting to improve their conditions, at best, or voting to pretend to change some aspect of them, at worst? Let's start with the latest ISTAT data. In June, more than 24 million people were employed in Italy, with an employment rate reaching 62.5% and a sharper increase among those aged 50-64 and in the South. Beyond the numbers, we live in an era where work is the only horizon granted by capitalism for survival. If you don't work, you can't live, or at best, you can survive. Those who can afford not to work do so only because they enjoy an income. This is the most concrete embodiment of Margaret Thatcher's "there is no alternative," the most extreme and brutal synthesis of neoliberalism that we still carry within us 40 years later. Yet, despite this, or perhaps precisely because of this, we experience work as an inevitable condemnation, as something natural, even fulfilling. The labor mantra still dominates. Those who kiss the ass of those in power, those who sacrifice their existence for a few hours of unpaid overtime, those who pretend to believe it, those who claim to have turned their passions into a profession and perhaps even believe it, win and rise in status. Those who don't lend themselves to these mechanisms are marginalized, sidelined, forced to settle for a minimum wage and, if things go well, can only rejoice in knowing how to avoid work. In Italy, these more general reflections are accompanied by a stubborn labor hegemony on several fronts. First, the institutional system has pandered to economic desires and has made work largely precarious and impoverished. With wages frozen for 30 years, the share of people who, despite working, remain poor or become poorer is steadily increasing. The latest estimates put this figure at around 10.5%, but the number is likely much higher due to the Catholic/bourgeois reluctance to admit they are poor and in need of help. Responsibility for this lies with all parties and unions (at least among the confederal unions; the discussion regarding grassroots unions is more complex), which therefore cannot afford to be surprised by their own lack of credibility. First, the Treu package, which introduced temporary work; then the Biagi law, which expanded the use of temporary workers across all sectors; then the Jobs Act, which further flexibilized and permanently eliminated Article 18 of the Workers' Statute, which prohibited dismissals without just cause; and then the ongoing support for businesses (EUR50 billion in 2025 alone) and the simultaneous removal of a large portion of contractual guarantees and welfare benefits; and so much more. So much so that when he was still President of the European Central Bank, the ineffable Mario Draghi said that "Italy is continuing with reforms, it's on autopilot." And autopilot remains an effective definition for summarizing the apparent lack of impact on improving working conditions for all. We often work out of inertia, and end up forgetting the daily exploitation. Notice this: more and more people hate their jobs or their colleagues, but the so-called "major resignations" phenomenon that characterized the Covid years, at least in journalistic and sociological accounts, has already subsided. This absence has been further fueled by the industrial decline of recent years: on the one hand, large companies are choosing the path of financialization, abandoning any ambition for investment, development, and innovation; on the other, the shift in employment priorities from agriculture and industry to services and tourism has led to a further fragmentation of the working classes, now crushed by a Darwinian individualism where even struggles, when they arise, struggle to break out of the narrow confines of sectoralization.
It's no coincidence that the strongest workers' struggle in recent years, that of the workers of the former GKN factory in Campi Bisenzio (near Florence), has created widespread belonging and solidarity around words like "convergence." If this broadly summarizes the starting conditions for the June referendums, it's no surprise that those who deserted the polls were precisely those who work, and even more so the exploited. Given that the CGIL (Italian General Confederation of Labour) will never be able to escape the crisis as long as it continues to pursue concerted action as its primary, if not sole, tool of mobilization, the question remains how to multiply and extend workplace struggles. Certainly, the dominant narrative about work, espoused even by exploited workers, needs to be overturned: entrepreneurs as heroes, young people who reject slavery as spoiled, and state subsidies to companies as a way to create jobs. But this isn't enough. Beyond avoiding the deception of voting and institutional support-after all, didn't the world's most beautiful Constitution state in its first article, as early as 1947, that Italy is a Republic founded on work?-we need to promote a new model of work that counters the abstractness of certain Marxist theories with the concreteness of anarchist practices. Starting with the rejection of work, moving toward self-production and self-management.

https://www.sicilialibertaria.it/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center