|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Australia, ACF Picket Line: Building power in the bush (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 3 Nov 2026 06:47:42 +0200
ACF members started organising in bush regeneration last year; the
industry is ripe for change. ---- I started working in bush regeneration
five years ago. I needed a casual job and it seemed to me that, facing a
climate crisis in one of the world's leading extinction capitals, it
might be the most ethical job imaginable. ---- What I found was an
industry full of contradictions. Most of the workers are deeply
passionate about the environment and many have advanced degrees in the
field. But this passion and knowledge is heavily exploited, with pay
only marginally above minimum wage. The conditions are bare minimum, and
often genuinely unsafe. I can recall more than a few arguments I've had
with management while working on isolated sites, in 35°C heat, about
their unwillingness to provide us with water or access to toilets.
I also found an industry at odds with a system that prioritises economic
growth above all else.
Bushland management and conservation occupies a niche position in the
economy. The industry is reliant on inconsistent funding, with grants
coming from various government and council departments, as well as NGOs.
Workers in the industry provide an essential environmental service, but
it's rarely acknowledged as such.
The results are predictable. Passionate workers develop their skills,
they get burnt out, and then they leave the industry. In a way, the low
pay acts as a kind of natural filter. You need to be truly passionate
about plants and the environment to justify working in bush regen. This
has coloured a lot of my conversations with coworkers. We want to turn
our shitty casual jobs into careers. We want to stop bleeding away
knowledge and experience through high turnover. We want to be paid what
we're worth.
Our conditions have a lot to do with how new the industry is. The oldest
private bush regen companies date back to the late 80s or early 90s, and
the techniques we use from the late 70s. Bush regen has never seen any
serious attempt at getting organised. When I started, it was difficult
to even find out which union we were supposed to be covered by. For the
first few years I found myself paying dues to the wrong one!
Getting organised
Members of the Anarchist Communist Federation began organising in the
industry last year. It was a slow start, but signups here and there were
incredibly encouraging. It wasn't until 20 people showed up to our first
meeting that we really saw the potential for how strong a union could be.
Fast forward to today and we've organised a huge chunk of the workforce
at our company, with no sign of slowing. We also have delegates at
several other large bush regen companies and it's looking increasingly
likely that we'll be bargaining together for a multi-enterprise
agreement. We have successfully implemented health and safety
representation, and won increases in paid time off.
All of this, for me, comes after years of relatively unsuccessful
organising efforts. I spent 3 years at one company trying to organise my
coworkers and, in the end, had nothing to show for it. My strategy at
the time was one still followed by many segments of the left: "be the
loudest, most political person in your workplace."
In hindsight, the result of this strategy was entirely predictable - my
coworkers couldn't stand me! I was just "the political guy". The most I
achieved for all my work was convincing a couple of coworkers to vote
Socialist at the next election.
This time, I tried a new approach. I picked it up from a couple of the
ACF's "how to organise your workplace" workshops. I spent time
developing my relationships at work and made myself into a reliable and
approachable coworker. I didn't spend all my time debating my coworkers'
politics, or trying to 'correct them' on every issue. Instead, I
appealed to them on the basis of our shared economic interest - the
reality of the workplace.
Rather than demand they embrace socialism in one fell swoop, the union
allowed us to collectively develop our politics by taking action.
Something that worked really well was finding ways to involve people at
different levels of personal capacity. We started up an "activists and
delegates group", for those who were interested in putting in consistent
work to grow the union.
It helped to chase smaller wins. It's not all about the Enterprise
Agreement - you can change a lot about a workplace in the meantime. And
every win will be one more thing you can point to to convince people to
join up. Every issue, no matter how individual or small, is an
opportunity to get more people involved, and to discover the hidden
activists in your workplace. From there, you can share the workload of
building collective power.
The school of class struggle
Since we got organised, my coworkers have developed a clearer political
understanding of both our industry as a whole, and our place as workers
within it. Every economic demand that the bosses resist demonstrates the
real nature of the workplace under capitalism. It shows people that the
power of the ruling class can only be met with the organised power of
the workers.
Increasingly, I find that I'm having conversations about how we could
change the industry as a whole: How, if workers controlled the industry,
we could do things more effectively, equitably, and sustainably.
The process of developing our politics through struggle has raised other
questions too. Weeds and biodiversity loss cost the Australian economy
money, and the work we do as bush regenerators reduces these costs. But
this financial benefit to the economy is minuscule. The benefits will
never be enough for governments to justify properly investing in the
industry. Government funding is, as much as anything, a way for the
ruling class to cover for the environmental devastation they facilitate
on a daily basis.
The environmental work that we care about will always be limited and
exploited in a system run on profit and commodification. Only by getting
organised can we build solidarity across workplaces and communities,
demand that our industry get the resources it needs, and win the
conditions that we deserve.
https://ancomfed.org/2026/10/building-power-in-the-bush/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(tr) US, BRRN: ATX Dayanışma Ağı, Ücret Hırsızlığı, Göç ve Kayıtsızlıkla Mücadele Ediyor (ca, de, en, fr, it, pt)[makine çevirisi]
- Next by Date:
(ca) Australia, ACF: Línea de piquete: El blues del almacén (de, en, fr, it, pt, tr)[Traducción automática]
A-Infos Information Center