|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Australia, AnConFed Picket Line: The One Nation surge (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:29:57 +0300
Workers are flocking to Hanson's party. To beat the far-right, we need
organisation. ---- One Nation is sitting at around 30% in the polls. By
some projections, that's enough to win over 60 seats in parliament. The
Liberals would be wiped out, and a big chunk taken out of Labor's vote.
--- Hanson would hold the balance of power. If her support keeps
growing, or if what's left of the Liberals decide to back her, One
Nation could end up running the country.
What would One Nation want to do with that power? Like their mate Trump,
they would move to implement a policy of mass deportation which would
terrorise migrant workers, whatever their legal status. Access to
abortion would be restricted. Even more than Liberal and Labor
governments, they would demonise Muslims and lock refugees up in
concentration camps. Native Title would be rolled back and the policing
of Indigenous communities ramped up.
No surprise then that the neo-Nazi National Socialist Network have
called Hanson 'the great white hope'. A strong One Nation will embolden
fascist groups to target ethnic minorities, queer people, socialists,
and trade unionists.
One Nation's far-right agenda is an attack on the entire working class.
That's why capitalists (particularly in the mining industry) are jumping
on the bandwagon.
The ruling class don't want us organising strikes against the bosses, or
thinking about how we might change society outside of the electoral
system. They know workers are angry and hate the major parties. The
bosses want to control that anger in a way that doesn't blow up in their
faces.
One Nation is the perfect solution: it leads workers back into the
system, and gets them to blame each other for inflation and the housing
crisis. Meanwhile, Hanson can help her rich supporters, like Gina
Rinehart, get even richer.
Members of the Anarchist Communist Federation have joined protests
against One Nation around the country because we know the threat can't
be ignored. But just heckling Hanson or chasing her from event to event
isn't a winning strategy.
To actually stop One Nation, we need to understand where its support
comes from so we can stamp it out at the root.
The cross-class alliance
Why is Hanson doing so well?
To some, the answer is simple: Clearly, Australia is just full of
ignorant racists. The typical One Nation voter is imagined as a
privileged, old white man who owns some property and a small business.
This is the line currently being peddled by the Socialist Party. They
argue One Nation isn't backed by a significant number of workers, and so
appealing to the party's supporters is a waste of time.
Others give Hanson exactly what she wants by claiming the exact
opposite. It's typical to see One Nation portrayed as an
'anti-establishment' party, fighting on behalf of 'battlers'-ordinary
Aussie workers with 'reasonable concerns' about immigration.
Both are wrong.
In reality, One Nation's support is typical of successful far-right
parties, going back to the fascist movements of Italy and Nazi Germany.
It doesn't draw its votes from any one group. It's a cross-class
alliance. Both workers and bosses are being mobilised around
nationalism. To pull this off, Hanson is being two-faced. She's making
one argument to the rich, and another to the rest of us.
Yes, One Nation is increasingly bankrolled by rich capitalists jumping
ship from the Liberals. The mining sector in particular now sees One
Nation as the party best placed to keep its gravy train running. It's
also true that One Nation's die-hard base (the 5% who have always been
around) are mostly well-off bigots.
But the global economic crisis-triggered first by the crash of 2008,
intensified in Australia by COVID, and deepened by the war on Iran-has
changed the equation. One Nation is now attracting a big section of the
working class.
The polls don't lie. A recent DemosAU study shows that while One Nation
is definitely supported by a lot of rich people (31% earning $125k+),
they also lead among workers earning under $45k (31% vs ALPs 24%). For
those earning $45-125k, support is split between One Nation (29%) and
Labor (31%).
Sure, One Nation leads among outright home owners (29% vs ALP/LIBs at
25%), but they do far better with mortgage holders (33%). And when it
comes to renters, they're tied first with Labor (both 29%).
In regional and rural areas, One Nation totally dominates, regardless of
class. The party is strong in the outer suburbs too, where they're also
in front. Support from women is equal with men, if not higher, and the
party has as many multi-lingual supporters as the Greens.
Why One Nation? Why now?
Where has all this support for an explicitly racist party come from? And
why does the appeal even extend to some migrants?
Racism has always been a part of Australian society. Whether we're
talking about colonisation, the White Australia Policy, or the horrific
treatment of refugees, the major parties in Australia have never shied
away from it. But this was true ten years ago too. So why is One Nation
exploding in popularity now?
Again, the numbers don't lie. A poll done in May by RoyMorgan lists the
main reasons given by supporters for backing the party.
52% were motivated by the major parties being too similar and not
working for ordinary Australians. Many others gave similar 'protest
vote' explanations. Only 12% mentioned 'support for small businesses' or
'cutting regulation', whereas 28% talked about the cost of living and
housing affordability.
The top reason given for supporting One Nation, though, was 'reducing
immigration' (58%). But look a little deeper, and the details are
telling: One Nation supporters consistently blame high immigration for
the cost of living and housing crises.
Where we don't organise, they will
Pauline Hanson is racist. Endorsing One Nation policies is support for
racism. The party is seizing on the ugliest prejudices in the country
and whipping supporters up into a hateful frenzy. But workers are being
mobilised around these views for largely economic reasons.
The truth is that, for millions of us, life is getting worse. One Nation
are telling struggling working class people a story that sounds
convincing, with a quick fix: Capitalism isn't the problem. The problem
is all those migrants, and the lefties who stick up for them. They're
the ones taking all the homes, overcrowding public services, and wasting
your taxes.
The ruling class love this story. It's why they're lining up to give
Hanson buckets of cash, private planes, and marketing her as an
'anti-establishment' outsider. Their worst fear is workers getting
organised, turning away from electoral politics, and using their
collective power to force real change.
Fighting together in a union teaches workers to stick up for one another
and builds real power. When workers have power and resources, it
undermines the conditions that fuel racist division.
But our unions have been battered for decades. In many parts of the
country, they barely exist. Suburban, regional, and rural workers-many
in communities hollowed out by globalisation-are more likely to belong
to their local sports club or church: cross-class organisations.
This is a big reason why One Nation do better the further you get from
major cities. Not because people in the country are stupid or immoral,
but because that's where working class organisation is weakest.
A crisis for our class
Under a Hanson government, the bosses, landlords, and bankers would be
given more power.
One Nation think the minimum wage is too high, that workers don't
deserve penalty rates, and that bosses should be able to fire you for
any reason. They want to protect companies from being charged with wage
theft, or being held responsible for deaths on unsafe worksites.
Meanwhile, they think that rich capitalists pay too much tax. To keep
the government finances in order, they'd gut funding for health and
education.
Millions of workers intend to vote for this.
In response, the Socialist Party and the Greens have argued for a
'political alternative'. They want anti-racist workers and students to
protest One Nation, and to funnel these activists into doorknocking for
left-wing candidates at the next election.
This is a losing strategy. There aren't enough ideologically committed
Greens or socialists to beat Hanson at the ballot box, or stamp out her
movement in the country.
It's a no-win situation. If One Nation underperform, migrants will still
be scapegoated for the economic crisis. And if they win... Well, what
then? Electoral campaigns don't build the kind of lasting class power
we'd need to resist Hanson's agenda.
No shortcuts
If One Nation were to disappear tomorrow, some other group would take
their place. Hanson's movement is a symptom. The disease is capitalism.
The fight against One Nation can't be reduced to an abstract
'anti-racism'. It has to be fought as a struggle for higher wages, more
housing, and funding for public services. Not just in city centres, but
in workplaces everywhere. To those rightly fed up with the system, we
need to offer a critique of capitalism and a realistic vision of
workers' power.
Today, few workers are convinced socialists or even willing to sign up
to the Greens. Most have no interest in political parties or elections.
But when the boss needs to be fought, workers with all kinds of opinions
can join the union. From there, solidarity can be built step by step.
Because when we go on strike together, we see the results of our own
power. Power changes what people think is possible, and who they're
willing to stand with. And inevitably, when the bosses hit back, workers
see clearly who the real enemy is-and that frauds like One Nation are on
the other side of the picket line.
https://ancomfed.org/2026/08/the-one-nation-surge/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(it) UK, AFEd: Organise - Sone Ma A'Poi: La squadra delle streghe I. (1/2) (ca, de, en, fr, pt, tr)[traduzione automatica]
- Next by Date:
(en) UK, ACG, Jackdaw 26 - Birmingham Bin Strike: Not over! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center