|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Germany, LIKOS: Analysis of the Militant Investigation Published on: (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Wed, 5 Aug 2026 07:36:11 +0300
As the "Osnabrück for All" alliance, we have been engaging with
political developments in the city of Osnabrück for two years now. Our
focus is primarily on the "10-Point Program," which was jointly
developed by Mayor Katharina Pötter and the Osnabrück Police Department.
--- It is obvious that the measures adopted therein primarily affect the
poorest of the poor and further contribute to gentrification.
Over the past two years, our alliance has worked intensively to draw
attention to these issues (displacement and gentrification) and to offer
a critical perspective on the city's plans. To this end, we have
organized rallies, demonstrations, lectures, and informal gatherings.
In 2025, we, as an alliance, decided to engage in dialogue with the
people on the ground. We wanted to gain insight into the thoughts and
experiences of the people who pass by Johannisstraße every day.
To engage with people, we set up a small stand on Johannisstrasse for
several hours on two Saturdays.
The reactions to us varied greatly: Some people were immediately
engaged. Others reacted very negatively. And there were those who asked
skeptical questions.
Since many people assumed we were trying to sell something, it was all
the more important for us to make it clear from the outset that we were
interested in their opinions, assessments, and experiences.
To record the results of these conversations and evaluate them later, we
devised eleven questions, divided into two parts.
In the first part, we asked six questions, to which each person could
indicate on a scale of 1 to 5 how much the question applied to them.
We used a bar chart to analyze this data, as shown below.
In the second part, we asked five more questions, to which people could
answer in one or two sentences.
Since we only took notes during the second part of the interview, we
would like to briefly summarize the most important findings and the most
frequent responses from the participants.
As the bar chart already suggests, the dominant topic was housing.
In almost every conversation, the lack of social housing was mentioned,
and it was stated that the city and politicians should prioritize this
issue more.
The term "homelessness" came up repeatedly in the discussions, and many
respondents expressed a desire for a more socially responsible housing
policy.
This highlights the respondents' dissatisfaction with the city's
decisions, which seem to prioritize the punitive displacement of people
over the creation of social housing.
The city is not focused on ensuring that everyone has a roof over their
head unconditionally, but rather on maximizing the profits of real
estate speculators. The people we interviewed were of the opinion that
housing should not be a commodity used to enrich a select few.
Another interesting finding from the open questions, also reflected in
the bar chart, is that the connection between video surveillance and AI
is not readily apparent to many people.
A common response to the question of whether they felt observed by the
new cameras was that they did not, as they had nothing to hide. However,
when asked about the impact of AI, significantly more concern was expressed.
Conclusion:
The conversations we had clearly demonstrate that the housing market is
a central political issue for many people.
For us as an alliance, it is obvious how much the interests of the
market, which aims to maximize profits for a select few, contradict the
interests of the majority of the population Brasil, Bento Goncalves/RS,
OSL: namely, the need to have a roof over their heads without having to
spend the majority of their income on it.
These are the interests of the majority of the population, namely the
need to have a roof over their heads without having to spend the
majority of their income on it. The security aspect, which is used as a
pretext to harass and further displace people who are already the
poorest of the poor, should also be criticized and fought from a
standpoint of solidarity.
https://likos.noblogs.org/2026/06/26/auswertung-der-militanten-untersuchung/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, Trieste, Germinal: When the State Collapses, People Organize (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) France, UCL AL #372 - Ecology - Imperialisms: Fascist G7, Libertarian Response! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center