|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: Polar Blast - The State: Authority Without Legitimacy (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 26 May 2026 08:16:26 +0300
If capitalism is the economic face of domination, the state is its
political face. And just as anarcho-communists reject the liberal theory
of the market as a space of genuine freedom, they reject the liberal
theory of the state as a neutral arbiter of competing interests. The
state is not a social contract. It is a historical accumulation of
force, violence, and authority that serves the interests of dominant
classes while presenting itself as the universal representative of the
common good.
This rejection of the state is perhaps the most distinctive and
misunderstood aspect of anarchism. People who have grown up in societies
where the state appears to be the source of healthcare, education,
welfare, and protection from corporate abuse often find anarchist
anti-statism alarming, as if abolishing the state would simply mean
abolishing all collective provision and leaving everyone at the mercy of
unconstrained capital. This is a serious misunderstanding, and it is
worth addressing directly.
The anarcho-communist does not oppose collective provision. Quite the
opposite, anarcho-communism is premised on the belief that collective,
cooperative provision of the necessities of life is both possible and
desirable. What anarcho-communists oppose is the particular form that
collective organisation takes when it is mediated through a centralised,
hierarchical, coercive institution claiming a monopoly on legitimate
violence. The state delivers some social goods while simultaneously
maintaining the conditions of exploitation, managing populations through
surveillance and discipline, engaging in colonial and imperial
adventures, suppressing radical political activity, and concentrating
decision-making power in the hands of a bureaucratic and political elite
who are not, in any meaningful sense, accountable to the people they
claim to govern.
The freedom-relevant question about the state is does it increase or
decrease the real capacity of ordinary people to control the conditions
of their lives? And the anarchocommunist answer, consistently, is that
even the most democratic state falls systematically short.
Representative democracy, the form of political organisation celebrated
in liberal theory, is a mechanism for periodic ratification of elite
rule, not for genuine popular self-governance. You vote every few years
for one of a handful of parties whose policy differences are contained
within a narrow range acceptable to the economic establishment. Between
elections, the decisions that actually shape your life, investment and
disinvestment, planning and development, policing and incarceration, war
and peace, are made by people you did not choose and cannot effectively
challenge. This is not self-governance, it is managed consent.
Genuine political freedom, in the anarcho-communist vision, means direct
participation in the decisions that affect you, through popular
assemblies, workers' councils, community organisations, federated
structures of mutual accountability, and the whole rich repertoire of
non-hierarchical collective self-governance that anarchists have both
theorised and practised. It is not the freedom to choose between
pre-selected options every few years, rather it is the ongoing freedom
to participate in shaping the collective life you share with others.
Importantly, this is not simply a critique of existing states but a
positive vision of how human communities can organise themselves.
Kropotkin's writings on mutual aid and the commune, Malatesta's writings
on federation and free agreement, the Zapatistas' practice of autonomous
self-governance in Chiapas, the communalist experiments in Rojava, all
of these represent attempts to think through and practise what genuine
political freedom might look like. The anarchist is not just against the
state, the anarchist is for something richer, more participatory, more
genuinely free.
https://thepolarblast.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/to-be-free-together.pd
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) Spaine, Regeneration: Industriegewerkschaften: Von der proletarischen Revolution zum Niedergang Von EMBAT (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) Spaine, Regeneration: Industrial Unionism: From Proletarian Revolution to Decline, By EMBAT (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center