|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) UK, AFed, Organaise - THE NORDIC MODEL IS AN EXPANSION OF POLICE POWERS. ANARCHISTS MUST JOIN SEX WORKERS TO FIGHT AGAINST IT. (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 30 Apr 2026 07:26:38 +0300
Earlier this year, sex workers in Scotland secured a hard-won victory.
Ash Regan's "Unbuyable" bill was voted down in the first stage, although
by a margin of just ten votes. The bill was the latest effort by a
left-leaning politician to introduce client and third party
criminalisation laws - also known as the Nordic Model - across Britain,
Northern Ireland having already adopted it in 2015. ---- Sex work - and
which laws should govern it - is a divisive issue among Anarchists and
the broader left. Support for the Nordic Model is widespread, including
among those who identify as communists. Sex workers find ourselves in
the unenviable position of having to battle against those who should be
our allies, and who suddenly abandon anti-carceral and borderless ideals
to support a model that represents a massive expansion of repressive
policing and state surveillance.
Communist opposition to sex work is generally linked to a fundamental
opposition to commodification - the process of turning human life and
activity into objects to be bought and sold. This is something we can
all get behind. We all experience the profound dehumanisation of a
culture that treats us as consumers and labourers rather than human
beings, not to mention the soul-destroying process of monetising what
might once have simply been a treasured skill or hobby.
Obscenely rich people aside, engaging in any kind of labour for profit
can never be a free choice under capitalism. This is not unique to sex
work; none of us have full agency when the alternative is not having a
roof over our heads or food on the table. Ask any commuter on the tube
at 7:30am whether they're headed to their office cubicle out of sheer
free will, and I think we all know the answer.
Where I get lost is casting sex work as somehow unique; the ultimate
frontier of capitalist intrusion, where the most intimate parts of human
existence are turned into a market product. "Labour Power" and
"Personhood", believed to be separate in other areas of work, are here
deemed indistinguishable, making sex work a particular violation of
human life and dignity. These strangely romanticised depictions of sex
are at odds with the reality of human behaviour - people regularly have
sex for deeply unromantic reasons, and there's nothing wrong with that.
The naivety of this perspective hints at a lack of much lived experience
here, and I struggle to engage with it seriously.
Regardless, this shouldn't matter. Even if you insist on holding sex
work to a unique standard here, anyone on the left should still oppose
the Nordic Model for what it actually does. It may claim to be about
abolishing sex work. However, it does not address any of the key drivers
of sex work - primarily poverty and financial need, as well as
discrimination against queer and trans people, inaccessible workplaces,
insufficient welfare support, and those with no recourse to public
funds. Instead, it simply aims to punish and disrupt people's lives
enough that they'll stop doing it.
For obvious reasons, this doesn't work. No one can ever be criminalised
enough that they will stop needing money to survive. But the Nordic
Model is so much worse than ineffective; it's cruel. The repercussions
will affect sex workers and non-sex workers alike. Here's the reality of
what these forms of criminalisation mean.
The systems required to enforce client and third party criminalisation
laws are inherently those of mass-surveillance. As such, the
introduction of the Nordic Model would herald an enormous rise in
digital monitoring and surveillance of private communications, as police
attempt to ascertain where paid transactional sex is being arranged.
This means all of us will face greater online intrusion than ever into
our private correspondence and online activities.
It won't just be online. Police will stake out the locations from which
people are suspected of selling sex, while they wait to catch and fine
those involved. This means increased resources for undercover policing,
CCTV and other covert filming or recording, and general mass intrusion
into people's personal lives. And tools built ostensibly to catch
clients are easily repurposed for monitoring any other activities that
law enforcement doesn't like. Once the state has the power to monitor
your movements, private transactions and messages for the crime of
purchasing sex, they can also monitor them for political dissent or
"illegal" protests.
This surveillance will also be applied at the border, where individuals
even suspected of sex work can be barred from entering the country -
essentially providing a gift-wrapped excuse for those who want to see
borders policed more aggressively. In Norway, Nordic Model laws were
used to deport migrant sex workers after they approached the police to
report assault. In Sweden - which pioneered these laws - sex workers are
deported on vague and unsubstantiated claims of "public order", and new
amendments to the Aliens Act are set to remove settled status from those
not supporting themselves by "honest means".
Perhaps the most cynical aspect of the Nordic Model is its calculated
destruction of collective safety. The criminalisation of third parties
sees peer support treated as criminal conspiracy. If a sex worker shares
their earnings with a partner, a parent, or a child, those loved ones
are viewed as profiting off of sex work. If a worker shares the details
of their booking with a support network or a safety buddy, that person
is criminalised as facilitating her sex work. This is a state-mandated
dismantling of mutual aid and collective care. By criminalising the
networks we build to protect ourselves, the Nordic Model effectively
mandates isolation - the most dangerous condition for any worker.
In short, the Nordic Model is a massive expansion of police powers,
creating a perpetual state of surveillance and intervention to enforce
these laws. This will affect all of us, but will be disproportionately
used against already marginalised communities: those who are racialised,
queer, trans, migrants and disabled. No one should claim to be on the
left while supporting this.
If you don't like people selling sex, fine. Plenty of sex workers don't
really like it either. And if you want to talk about fewer people doing
sex work, then great - let's talk about an actual living wage. Let's
talk about affordable housing. Let's talk about tackling soaring energy
prices and food costs. Let's talk about giving migrants full working
rights and recourse to public funds. Let's talk about better support for
mothers and people with disabilities.
Not liking sex work or wanting to see fewer people doing sex work should
never be grounds to support the Nordic Model. We are all doing our best
to survive capitalism. Sex work and sex workers are not unique in this
regard and our ranks are comprised of society's poorest and most
vulnerable, sometimes acting in desperation to survive. The response
should never be criminalisation. The Nordic model is breathtaking not
just in its scope, but in its cruelty.
Victory in Scotland has for now been won, and I hope Scotland for
Decrim's members are taking time to rest and heal after an inspiring but
no doubt draining campaign. Unfortunately, this won't be the last battle
against the Nordic Model that sex workers in the UK have to fight.
Anarchists and the entire political left wing need to get on board,
before we all find ourselves at the mercy of an ever expanding police state.
Marin Scarlett
Marin is a sex workers' rights activist and can be found on social media
here @marinscarlett_.
The featured artwork is by Krime an anarchist artist and propagandist
based in the South West of England, you can find more of their work on
krime.uk.
Both Marin and Krime donated their commissions to S.A.F.E. (who work to
to ensure abortion access to the people across Europe who have been
abandoned by governments and healthcare systems) and SWARM (a sex worker
led collective based in the UK) respectively. You can support these
organisations directly here:
supportingabortions.eu/donate
swarmcollective.org/get-involved
THE MAGAZINE OF THE ANARCHIST FEDERATION
https://organisemagazine.org.uk/2026/03/23/a-report-from-nes-10-22-03-26
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) France, OCL CA #358 - First-instance trial in a case of modern slavery in Champagne (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #10-26 - Via Giuseppe Pinelli Inaugurated. Milan: The Committee Wins the Battle. Pino Returns to His Neighborhood (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center