|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #11-26 - Get the computer out of the paycheck! Fiscal complexity as an instrument of domination (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:33:01 +0300
There comes a point when technology ceases to be a tool and becomes
power. That moment, today, is the paycheck. ---- Anyone who has tried to
read one knows it: a sequence of items, codes, acronyms, rates,
deductions, substitute taxes. It's not simply complicated: it's
structurally incomprehensible. It's not designed to be read by the
recipient, but to be processed by computer systems. And here lies the
first crux.
Complexity is not a side effect: it's a choice. The tax and contribution
system has been stratified over the years through exemptions,
exceptions, temporary incentives, and special regimes. Each intervention
has added to the previous one without replacing it. The result is not a
fairer system, but a system that can no longer be controlled by those
who endure it.
It wasn't always this way. Pay was understandable, debatable,
contestable. The worker could at least roughly verify how the gross
amount was calculated. Today, this possibility has disappeared. Not
because of individual incompetence, but because the system is structured
in such a way that it requires external tools to be interpreted.
Software, consultants, intermediaries: this is where real control shifts.
This shift is crucial: knowledge is separated from direct experience.
Workers are no longer able to control their own wages without resorting
to technical mediation. And when control passes through mediation, power
shifts. It is not a neutral issue.
Let's take a concrete example: the tax exemption on contractual wage
increases. It is presented as a benefit for everyone, but its actual
operation tells a different story. By applying a proportional substitute
tax, the tax burden on increases is reduced without taking into account
the overall progressivity of income.
The result is simple and measurable: those who have little earn little,
those who have more earn more. Using the same mechanism, a raise worth a
few dozen euros for an average salary generates double or triple the
benefits for the higher levels.
It's not a distortion: it's the normal functioning of a system that
replaces progressivity with proportionality on individual income components.
But all this remains invisible.
Because the paycheck is no longer a tool for understanding, but a
technical representation of calculations already made elsewhere. The
worker sees the result, not the process. And what isn't seen is not
contested. Complexity ceases to be a technical problem and becomes a
power relationship.
Not only because it prevents verification, but because it creates
dependency. Wage control is delegated to external structures:
proprietary software, processing centers, professionals. Knowledge
becomes concentrated, while workers lose autonomy. It's a form of
expropriation. Not of income, but of the ability to understand it. Not
knowing how one's pay is constructed means being unable to intervene,
unable to negotiate, unable to defend oneself. It means no longer being
able to oppose. It means having to accept.
And so the issue becomes political again.
It's not about "simplifying" in a technical sense, but about restoring
power, accessibility, and control. A system that cannot be understood by
those who endure it is, by definition, an authoritarian system, even
when it presents itself as neutral.
Because behind every voice is a choice. Behind every algorithm is a
decision.
And what has been built can be dismantled.
This is why the demand is simple, yet radical: remove the computer from
the paycheck. Not in the sense of rejecting technology, but of rejecting
its use as an instrument of separation and domination. Technology must
return to being comprehensible, verifiable, and shared.
Otherwise, it's not technology. It's power.
Totò Caggese
https://umanitanova.org/fuori-il-computer-dalla-busta-paga-la-complessita-fiscale-come-strumento-di-dominio/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: Polar Blast - Was wahre Freiheit wirklich bedeutet (ca, en, it, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, FDCA, Cantiere #43 - History expresses those who interpret it - Libertarian Alternative / FdCA (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center