A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025 | of 2026

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #11-26 - Get the computer out of the paycheck! Fiscal complexity as an instrument of domination (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:33:01 +0300


There comes a point when technology ceases to be a tool and becomes power. That moment, today, is the paycheck. ---- Anyone who has tried to read one knows it: a sequence of items, codes, acronyms, rates, deductions, substitute taxes. It's not simply complicated: it's structurally incomprehensible. It's not designed to be read by the recipient, but to be processed by computer systems. And here lies the first crux.
Complexity is not a side effect: it's a choice. The tax and contribution system has been stratified over the years through exemptions, exceptions, temporary incentives, and special regimes. Each intervention has added to the previous one without replacing it. The result is not a fairer system, but a system that can no longer be controlled by those who endure it.

It wasn't always this way. Pay was understandable, debatable, contestable. The worker could at least roughly verify how the gross amount was calculated. Today, this possibility has disappeared. Not because of individual incompetence, but because the system is structured in such a way that it requires external tools to be interpreted.

Software, consultants, intermediaries: this is where real control shifts.

This shift is crucial: knowledge is separated from direct experience. Workers are no longer able to control their own wages without resorting to technical mediation. And when control passes through mediation, power shifts. It is not a neutral issue.

Let's take a concrete example: the tax exemption on contractual wage increases. It is presented as a benefit for everyone, but its actual operation tells a different story. By applying a proportional substitute tax, the tax burden on increases is reduced without taking into account the overall progressivity of income.

The result is simple and measurable: those who have little earn little, those who have more earn more. Using the same mechanism, a raise worth a few dozen euros for an average salary generates double or triple the benefits for the higher levels.

It's not a distortion: it's the normal functioning of a system that replaces progressivity with proportionality on individual income components.

But all this remains invisible.

Because the paycheck is no longer a tool for understanding, but a technical representation of calculations already made elsewhere. The worker sees the result, not the process. And what isn't seen is not contested. Complexity ceases to be a technical problem and becomes a power relationship.

Not only because it prevents verification, but because it creates dependency. Wage control is delegated to external structures: proprietary software, processing centers, professionals. Knowledge becomes concentrated, while workers lose autonomy. It's a form of expropriation. Not of income, but of the ability to understand it. Not knowing how one's pay is constructed means being unable to intervene, unable to negotiate, unable to defend oneself. It means no longer being able to oppose. It means having to accept.

And so the issue becomes political again.

It's not about "simplifying" in a technical sense, but about restoring power, accessibility, and control. A system that cannot be understood by those who endure it is, by definition, an authoritarian system, even when it presents itself as neutral.

Because behind every voice is a choice. Behind every algorithm is a decision.

And what has been built can be dismantled.

This is why the demand is simple, yet radical: remove the computer from the paycheck. Not in the sense of rejecting technology, but of rejecting its use as an instrument of separation and domination. Technology must return to being comprehensible, verifiable, and shared.

Otherwise, it's not technology. It's power.

Totò Caggese

https://umanitanova.org/fuori-il-computer-dalla-busta-paga-la-complessita-fiscale-come-strumento-di-dominio/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center