|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #6-26 - Olympics in Uniform. When Sport Becomes a Cog in the State's Wheel (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 3 Mar 2026 07:58:10 +0200
They tell us that the Olympics are a celebration of the people. They
speak of brotherhood, peace, merit, and individual sacrifice. But behind
the waving flags and national anthems, the reality is different:
high-level sport, increasingly, is a sector integrated within the state
and military apparatus. Not a free and popular sphere, but a propaganda,
recruitment, and discipline device. In Italy, the phenomenon is evident
to all, even if it is rarely questioned. At the 2024 Paris Olympics,
over 70% of Italian athletes-more than 280 out of 403-are enrolled in
military or police sports groups. Army, Carabinieri, Guardia di Finanza,
State Police: medals are counted in uniform. This is not an
administrative detail. It is a political fact.
The Athlete as a State Official
Italy employs approximately 2,500 athletes, coaches, and managers within
its armed forces and police forces. In many cases, enlistment is not an
ideological choice, but a material necessity: without the "uniform,"
there is no salary, no continuity of training, no social security
coverage. The message is clear: if you want to compete at a high level,
you must join the ranks.
Sport, thus, is no longer an autonomous space, but a branch of the state
apparatus. The athlete becomes a public employee, framed within
hierarchical structures, subject to military discipline, inserted into a
system whose ultimate goal is not collective emancipation, but national
prestige.
This transformation is not new. During the Cold War, the Soviet bloc
regimes developed the "state athlete" model as a tool for geopolitical
competition. But today, in the midst of advanced capitalism, we are
witnessing a paradoxical convergence: formally opposed models find
themselves united in the same logic of control and nationalization of
sport. Russia, China, Germany, and many other countries maintain sports
structures linked to the armed forces. Italy is not a folkloristic
exception: it is one of the most structured cases in Western Europe.
Nationalism, discipline, propaganda
The problem is not public support for sport. The problem is what kind of
support, and with what logic.
When sport is embedded in the armed forces and police, it inevitably
becomes intertwined with the culture of obedience, hierarchy, and
nationalism. Medals become instruments of soft power. Athletes become
symbols to be displayed in institutional parades. The rhetoric of
sporting sacrifice overlaps with that of military sacrifice.
In a context where defense spending is growing everywhere, and where the
arms race has once again become a political priority, the absorption of
sport into the military takes on an even more disturbing significance.
The same organizations that manage training and armaments also finance
gyms and athletics tracks. The line is becoming blurred. It's no
coincidence that many disciplines historically supported by military
groups are those that serve a certain idea of virility and national
strength: shooting, fencing, athletics, winter sports. Meanwhile,
grassroots sports, those of the suburbs, popular gyms, and self-managed
associations, survive with insufficient funding and chronic insecurity.
A false alternative: enlist or quit
This mechanism creates a profound distortion. Those who don't join
military sports groups remain marginalized. Private sponsors are few and
far between, focused on the more media-rich sports. Federations don't
guarantee sufficient support. Thus, enlistment becomes almost
obligatory. It's a form of structural co-optation: the state absorbs
talent by offering economic security in exchange for membership.
Explicit coercion isn't necessary; widespread insecurity is enough. The
result is a double inequality: on the one hand, between athletes "in
uniform" and civilian athletes. On the other, between sports supported
by the state apparatus and sports left to decay. Sporting merit is
filtered through an institutional access system. In this context,
Olympism loses any pretense of neutrality. Flags do not represent
peoples, but states. Anthems do not celebrate communities, but
apparatuses of power.
Reclaiming a social and self-managed sport
If sport is to truly be a space of emancipation, it must be removed from
military and nationalist logic. It's not about privatizing it, but about
socializing it.
Public resources currently channeled into the armed forces could
directly finance: independent amateur sports associations, with
scholarships and salaries for athletes without the obligation to enlist;
self-managed neighborhood sports facilities, accessible free of charge
or at nominal costs; inclusive local programs that prioritize mass
participation over Olympic showcases; cooperative networks between
sports clubs, free from military hierarchies and police controls.
At the same time, a radical debate should be opened on the very model of
international competitions. Why continue to organize sport around
competing nation-states? Why not imagine transnational federations,
territorial representations, mixed teams?
A liberated sport is not a sport without organization. It is a sport
freed from the logic of command.
Against the Olympics in uniform
The issue is not the good faith of individual athletes, who often have
no real alternatives. It concerns the structure that encompasses them.
As long as the path to the sporting elite passes through enlistment,
sport will remain a cog in the state apparatus. As long as medals are
counted as national trophies, Olympism will be a competition between
powers, not between people. Returning sport to society means disarming
it. It means separating it from barracks, police stations, and the logic
of geopolitical prestige. It means bringing it back to neighborhoods,
schools, and community gyms.
Sport can be cooperation, mutualism, and collective growth. But only if
it stops marching in step.
Parpajon
https://umanitanova.org/olimpiadi-in-divisa-quando-lo-sport-diventa-un-ingranaggio-dello-stato/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) France, OCL: Que crèvent la bête immonde et la barbarie capitaliste! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(de) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #6-26 - Olympische Spiele in Uniform. Wenn Sport zum Rädchen im Getriebe des Staates wird (ca, en, it, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
A-Infos Information Center