A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, OCL CA #353 - Gender Inequalities in Occupational Health (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:11:14 +0200


In France, in 2020, the proportion of women in the workforce increased to 50%. But while their jobs differ greatly from those of men in terms of sector, profession, and status, occupational health is often viewed solely through a male lens. While both men and women face deteriorating working conditions and increased exposure to toxic substances, the risks specifically faced by women at work are not addressed, and the resulting occupational illnesses are not recognized.

The organization of workplace accident monitoring and occupational risk prevention has been largely dismantled in recent years: greater access to preventive care, the transfer of occupational medicine to employers, and the disappearance of the CHSCT (Health, Safety, and Working Conditions Committee). Furthermore, the scarce gender-disaggregated data (for example, from the National Health Insurance Fund) are not used, and sectors with a larger female workforce, or where jobs are held by women, are rarely the subject of specific research and studies on women's health at work[1].

Women very often work in services-medical and social work, social work, healthcare, accommodation, teaching, and cleaning. The jobs they perform are traditionally considered to be easy, safe, and without major health consequences. Cleaning train toilets or hotel rooms for a few hours a day doesn't count! Many women are thus forgotten by the world of work, rendered invisible! Their working hours are often part-time, with atypical schedules. And yet, since more women than men work night shifts, they are more exposed to cancer and various adverse health effects: sleep disorders, decreased cognitive performance, obesity, heart disease, and difficulties balancing work and family life. Finally, women's wages are generally lower than those of men-by 22% in 2019.

More work accidents
for women than for men in certain sectors
We are seeing an increase in work accidents among female employees in all sectors, primarily in healthcare, social work, and cleaning. In female-dominated sectors, there has been a decrease in work accidents among men (-13%) and an increase among women (+110%). The severity of accidents among women results in longer periods of sick leave on average than among men. Musculoskeletal disorders are more common among women than among men (+88%), particularly in cleaning services, but also in the food and agricultural industries. Workstations and workspaces are often designed by men and for a man of average height, making them unsuitable for the female body. Similarly, personal protective equipment (such as gloves or respiratory protection) is oversized for women, increasing their risk of pain, musculoskeletal disorders, and workplace accidents[2].

Occupational diseases
more recognized for men than for women
When an occupational disease is "recognized" for women, it is not included in the "official table of occupational diseases," as this was established based on sectors such as chemicals or construction, and not the healthcare or cleaning sectors. There is no table of occupational diseases for work-related psychological distress. In 2023, the most frequently reported illnesses were depression, anxiety, burnout, and sleep disorders. Similarly, gender-based and sexual violence in the workplace is more common, whether verbal or psychological.

Women can be exposed to carcinogenic substances in their work. Seven are found in cleaning products (such as silica-based surface disinfectants or strong acid mists), and cleaning brushes stir up dust in premises containing asbestos. These substances frequently cause blood cancers, which are not classified as occupational diseases.

Furthermore, the national lung cancer surveillance plan, which took asbestos exposure into account in 2016, excluded women, even though this type of cancer has increased by 50% among them. Indeed, since the sources of contamination for women are mainly non-occupational (particularly domestic, with the washing of the work clothes of a spouse exposed to asbestos) or environmental, the cancers that may result are not recognized as occupational diseases. The same is true for pesticides: farmers who use them to treat vineyards may have "recognized" cancers, meaning they may be entitled to compensation, but this system does not apply to their spouses, who are indirectly exposed to these pesticides.

Several studies have highlighted a higher risk of breast cancer for female workers in sectors such as electrical manufacturing, the rubber and plastics industry, agriculture, the food industry, and cosmetics. This risk is also increased by night work (between midnight and 5 a.m.), according to these studies. In 2023, for the first time in France, a nurse had her breast cancer recognized as an occupational disease related to 28 years of night work.
Finally, the consideration of women's sexual and reproductive health (such as "menstrual leave") still needs to be improved. Pregnancy is still a source of discrimination-derogatory remarks, hostile attitudes from management that lead to refusal of hiring or even dismissal under false pretenses.

Differentiating is not discriminating.
Taking into account the existing differences between women and men in occupational health should help advance prevention for all[3]. This, it seems, is not a given. Since 2014, the French Labor Code has provided for a gender-based approach to occupational health, but this approach is perceived by women as discriminatory, a source of inequality and stigmatization. Isn't it rather work and the conditions in which it is performed that should be questioned... and challenged?

Maryse V

OCL poster from 2001!
Notes
[1]"Women and Men, Equality in Question," Insee Références, 2022 edition, or Cohen L. et al., "Information Report on Behalf of the Delegation for Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities between Men and Women on Women's Health at Work," Senate, No. 780, June 27, 2023

[2]"Women and Men, Equality in Question," Insee Références, 2022 edition

[3]"Work: Women's Health Struggling," Prescrire Review No. 496, February 2025

http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4536
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center