A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #364 - Antifascism - Victor Duran-Le Peuch: "When we talk about speciesism, we're talking about a social relationship" (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 11 Nov 2025 07:54:53 +0200


Victor Duran-Le Peuch, who came to lead a workshop on speciesism during the UCL Summer Conference 2025, agreed to answer our questions. UCL doesn't have a firm position on antispeciesism, but this interview may open up some initial avenues for reflection. So, could you explain why you're on the antifascist pages and not on the environmental ones? It's important not to reduce the animal question to an appendix of the environmentalist project, for one simple reason: when we talk about speciesism, we're talking about a social relationship, a system of domination that affects a whole group of individuals.

And this has its place within anti-fascist thinking: speciesist ideology is truly embedded in the DNA of the far right and fascism, which rely on a total naturalization of systems of domination. There are superiors and there are others who can be crushed; it is the order of the world, immutable and implacable. It cuts across many different forms of domination: racism, ableism, LGBTI-phobia, and of course patriarchy. It is a supremacist ideology, the idea of nature, which has been analyzed in particular by materialist feminists and in fact by most social movements for emancipation, because it is the same arguments: it would be in their nature, in their essence, to be inferior, to be dominated. The consumption of animals fits perfectly into this and into a discourse of returning to traditions, of defending national identity. In France, there's this narrative built around eating animals, barbecue culture, and so on. This is also being co-opted by the masculinist ideology present on the far right. We're seeing the emergence of influencers who are all too proud to show off their fridges full of offal: it's the ultimate symbol of their virility and superiority. An anti-fascism that doesn't pinpoint the extent to which speciesism is embedded in this entire far-right ideological conglomeration is missing part of the analysis and perhaps also the means to combat fascist ideology.

What are the key concepts for discussing speciesism?

The most interesting definition of speciesism, in my opinion, is to describe it as a system of domination where the human class appropriates the class of animals, just as the class of men appropriates the class of women and sexist people, and this applies to all other forms of domination.

One concept is fundamental: sentience. Subjective consciousness: it means something to us to live our lives. We feel pleasures and pains, and our lives matter; we don't want our freedom to be deprived. Humans are sentient, like the vast majority of other animals. As such, they have interests, and it is completely illegitimate, unjust, and disgusting to deprive them of their lives, to impose suffering on them, to imprison them.

Victor Duran-Le Peuch is an anti-speciesist activist and the creator of the podcast "Comme un poisson dans l'eau" (Like a Fish in Water).
Plants, on the other hand, are sentient without being sentient. They react in very rich, complex, and surprising ways, but that doesn't mean they possess subjective consciousness: they don't have a brain, a nervous system, they don't have the minimal conditions we know are necessary to create that extra something we have in common with other animals, which is consciousness. A photovoltaic panel is sensitive to light. Our cell phones are sensitive to the touch we apply to the screen. However, that doesn't mean at all that these objects can sense things associated with these reactions to stimuli or information.

Why become anti-speciesist when you're on the left?

I really like Kaoutar Harchi's saying that "being on the left means not losing anyone." And normally, if you're on the left, you're not supposed to ignore an entire category of oppressed individuals. The left also has this moral and political ambition to represent the interests of the most vulnerable people in our societies. There are systems of domination that specifically target, and even actively make vulnerable, certain categories of inferior individuals. Yet there is an argument that we sometimes hear, specifically on the left, and its consequences are horrific: it is to say that animals cannot make a revolution and that therefore we don't care, that this struggle is not legitimate. When, on the contrary, we have an additional responsibility to come to their aid, to position ourselves as allies! Imagine if we drew the same conclusions about children: "they don't lead their political struggle, so we can continue to legitimize the system that establishes adults as superiors."
We also hinder our own efforts to pursue a left-wing project if we focus only on certain systems of domination. They are robust and have co-occurred to such an extent that they rely on a common ideology, on the same type of argument. The construction of animality as an inferior category legitimizes the oppression of all the categories of humans we animalize, particularly women and people of color. As Axelle Playoust-Braure writes, "to animalize is to make them killable," exploitable, and dominable. If we don't also fight against speciesism, we leave ourselves open to the worst forms of violence and domination, including against humans; it makes perfect sense to destroy speciesism for these reasons as well.

What do you recommend to someone who wants to become anti-speciesist?

First, we need to educate ourselves a little, to understand and have arguments to oppose those who legitimize human supremacy, and to connect anti-speciesism to other social struggles in the most interesting and politicized way possible. And also to prevent the animal rights movement from being hijacked, as most struggles can be: we take a very superficial and depoliticized version of it to serve other systems of domination. For example, the far right always brings up issues of ritual slaughter to re-legitimize the worst racist prejudices. But when it comes to bullfighting, they say nothing. There are plenty of racist tropes like that. We have enough to deal with with speciesism where we are, especially in Western countries, without having to look in other countries where there are anti-speciesists already doing the work.

Once we feel sufficiently informed, take action. I recommend joining or creating collectives, and not acting alone. Often, we only talk about veganism and have a very individual conception of it as a simple matter of consumption. However, we need to be able to think about the material conditions that is, collective, social, and political of access to a world with means of action that enable the end of speciesism and the advent of an anti-speciesist society.

Anti-speciesism goes far beyond the sole issue of veganism. We are for a project of equality with other animals, so the least we can do is aim to stop appropriating, individually and collectively, their bodies for our own completely unnecessary secondary interests. And then simply continue doing everything we are already doing to fight for a project of global emancipation.

Victor Duran-Le Peuch, En finir avec les idées fausses sur l'antispécisme (Ending the False Ideas about Antispeciesism), éditions de l'atelier, October 2025, 13.50 euros.
Finally: don't be timid... We spend our time hearing euphemisms like "animal cruelty," or conversely, "respect," "compassion," "animal protection": never power, domination, and in response, equality. We must be able to fight back with the right diagnoses and the right words.

It's also important to talk about the intertwining of capitalism and speciesism, because obviously the forms of appropriation of animal bodies are industrialized: they have been so transformed and intertwined with the development of capitalist industrial systems that it's our activist priority to also bring down capitalism for these reasons. Animals human and non-human are literally crushed inside... We need to be able to think about these issues without simplifying or reducing the place of animals in this system. In fact, that's part of the problem: they are reduced, objectified, swallowed up in production systems as commodities, and transformed into consumer products.

We must also not give free rein to discourses that re-legitimize other forms of speciesism under the guise of anti-capitalism by saying, "Yes, but small-scale livestock farming is the first line of defense against capitalism!" It would therefore be virtuous to fight for small-scale livestock farming where there would be "respect" for animals, when no, it's still violence, even on a small scale.

An argument I often get is, "Eating vegan is expensive."

We can do very well without processed products: we can eat pasta, cereals, legumes, vegetables, fruits... There are a lot of very healthy, very good and inexpensive products. And one of the reasons for the very high cost of meat or dairy substitutes is that they are not subsidized, while there are huge subsidies that go to livestock farming and fishing and make the prices of products derived from animal exploitation artificially low. Intrinsically, it's cheaper to simply grow plants, rather than growing them and then feeding them to animals, only to get slightly less protein! Livestock farming is fundamentally wasteful. The Common Agricultural Policy (implemented across the European Union) keeps certain industries alive that would otherwise fail. We could redirect all of this toward an ambitious and collective plant-based transition, organize a fairer economic system that supports industries that don't rely on the appropriation of other people's bodies.

Interview by Nasham (UCL Montreuil)

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Victor-Duran-Le-Peuch-Quand-on-parle-du-specisme-on-parle-d-un-rapport-social
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center