A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #364 - Culture - Read Olivier Besancenot and Michael Löwy, Marxists and Libertarians (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:25:27 +0200


Libertalia Publishing has just reissued a book by Olivier Besancenot and Michael Löwy, Revolutionary Affinities, originally published by Mille et Une Nuits in 2014. The book called for a libertarian Marxism. A debate that challenges us! It's an opportunity to take stock eleven years later and ask a question: what's new in the sky of red, black, and two-tone stars? Reading both versions of the book, we discover a nearly identical text, including the foreword and conclusion. On the cover, the phrase "for solidarity between Marxists and libertarians" has disappeared. A shame. The only notable change: the publisher has added references to the often excellent books it has published about the people or events mentioned throughout the pages. But we won't know if the authors have read them in the meantime. You may therefore wish to reread the articles written in AL in October 2014[1]before proceeding further.

Divergent Analyses
The entire book is full of ambiguities and vagueness. For example, the authors explain that the differences between Marx and Bakunin led to the "transfer" of the headquarters of the International Working Men's Association (IWA) to New York in 1872 and to the creation by the anarchists of their own international, retaining the name IWA. This fails to understand that this gesture by Marx founded an authoritarian conception of political organization. Marx preferred to sabotage the International rather than lose control of it, while "anti-authoritarian" currents were becoming the majority and were legitimately entitled to uphold the legacy of the IWA.

A founding gesture of the functioning of Leninist organizations in their Stalinist, Trotskyist, or Maoist variants, one of whose apexes is found in Trotsky's 1938 Transitional Program: "the historical crisis of humanity is reduced to the crisis of its revolutionary leadership." Indeed, if the role of the party is to lead the revolution, the conquest of party leadership is decisive. Here we touch on a central point of our differences between authoritarian Marxists and libertarian Marxists on the self-organization of the masses, the role and functioning of political organization, and the question of the state. Should the state be conquered by the party to put it at the service of the proletariat, or should it be destroyed so that it is not used against the proletariat?

Which anarchists does the book discuss?
Throughout the pages, the good points and the bad points are cheerfully mixed without any serious basis. What are the differences between libertarian currents? What differences exist between Marxist movements? This is an essential prerequisite. It is written that the IWA continues to unite "anarchists." What a joke! Especially without mentioning the existence of the international network of the Anarchist Federation (IFA) or that of Anarkismo (the UCL's international network). Is this a complete ignorance of the subject or a desire to confuse the issue? Because, in fact, libertarian Marxists already exist in France and are found mainly in the UCL.

And now, what should we do?
The authors also caricature our positions on elections, but nevertheless claim this divergence is minor. Elections are simply an opportunity to engage in revolutionary propaganda. This is true for LO. But not for the NPA, which regularly seeks alliances with reformist organizations. This observation is not anathema, but a serious divergence for anyone who would call themselves a "libertarian Marxist."

So, since the 2014 publication, nothing has changed. We maintain normal, united relations between the UCL and the NPA, as with other political forces. By dismissing the book review in L'Anticapitaliste (the NPA newspaper) in a few lines written by a former member of the AL, the NPA demonstrates its lack of interest in this debate. We remain ready and willing to explore it further at any time.

Jean-Yves (UCL Limousin)

Olivier Besancenot and Michael Löwy. Marxists and Libertarians, Libertalia, 2025, 224 pages, EUR10.

Validate

[1]"Around the book by Olivier Besancenot and Michael Löwy: Libertarian Communists vs. Authoritarian Communists," Alternative Libertaire No. 243, October 2014.

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Lire-Olivier-Besancenot-et-Michael-Lowy-Marxistes-et-libertaires
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center