A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Spaine, Regeneracion - Sketches for a New Thinking (I): Revolution and Freedom of Worship (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:56:51 +0300


By Static Week --- If God is dead, what has replaced Him? Faced with this question, Nietzsche himself would tell us that the "Overman" is what has replaced God. The "Overcoming of Man": the "man" (understood as "the human¹"), now as "Transcended Humanity," has developed enough tools to shape and write its future from the present according to its own will to power. Yet, is this really the situation we find ourselves in? Is this the reality behind the death of God? Behind the overcoming of dogma? Beyond a "humanism" that speaks of Human Rights while violating them in practically every corner of this world?

Unfortunately for us all, nothing could be further from the truth. The "Overman," the "Overcoming of Man" (which is none other than the "Overcoming of Humanity"), lies in becoming aware of the will to do everything we are prepared to do. In acquiring the true human virtue of being Human: beyond our humanism.

Faced with this reality, my good friend and comrade Lusberth, in one of our random conversations about various issues, told me: "Religion is one thing, spirituality is another." And here is where I wanted to arrive: to what extent does spirituality itself, beyond dogma, perhaps offer a deep, internal, and satisfying understanding of the will to power? To what extent is the "Overcoming of Humanity," the "Superhumanity," if you will allow me the boldness, capable of transgressing its own limits and going further toward the building and achievement of a New World?

We see such worlds today both in Mexico (specifically Chiapas), where the EZLN² "still and always resists the invader," and in Syrian Kurdistan (specifically Rojava), where a twenty-first-century revolution is taking place thanks to the tools of resistance granted by Democratic Confederalism. All of this, in both cases - as well as in many other cases closer to us³, or even unknown to us - is carried out by heroic and anonymous entities that show us that a new world is possible today. That a tomorrow from the past is being built in the present.

Of course, the construction of a new and better reality will always involve good and bad moments, successes and mistakes; a series of internal contradictions that, beyond the moment in which they occur, must be overcome. For a French woman or man at the end of the eighteenth century, making the Revolution and storming the Bastille in 1789 also meant an entire journey through uncertainty and "unreality," bathed in a constant "And now what?" - filled with contradictions and governments of despotic and reactionary tyrants against whom one had to rebel again. All of this is part of that great living being that is the revolution - that, without a doubt.

Nevertheless, in both present and past revolutions (we will speak of Russia in due time), we find examples not only of fully revolutionary practices4 but also of elements traditionally considered "reactionary" that serve the people. I refer here to the place occupied by certain members of religious estates or those linked to religion itself (considered by that Great Bearded One as the Opium of the People), who know their role in the Revolution5. I point here to two cases cited by George Woodcock in his text Dawn of Anarchism6: Winstanley and Roux. Both were religious; the latter was also a priest. Winstanley, a staunch fighter of the Digger movement during the English Revolution, said:

"God is nothing other than the incomprehensible spirit of reason. Where does reason reside? It resides in the depths of every creature according to the nature and mode of being of the creature itself, but supremely in man. Therefore, man is a rational creature (...). This is the kingdom of God within man."

In the case of Roux, priest and member of the Enragés during the French Revolution, we see7:

"Before leaving prison, Louis[Louis XVI], seeing that Roux was a priest, asked him if he could entrust him with his will. Roux coldly replied: 'I am only here to take you to the scaffold.' And yet, the man who looked with satisfaction upon the king's execution as a living manifestation of authority had to later protest from his own prison cell against the brutalities that the Terror inflicted upon men and women whose only crime was the rank into which they were born. (...) Roux was brought before the revolutionary tribunal and, convinced that his death was inevitable, mocked the guillotine by painfully taking his own life. 'I do not complain of the tribunal,' he said before dying; 'it has acted according to the law. But I have acted according to my freedom.' To die placing freedom above the law was the death of an anarchist."

And so, both then and now, there are "servants of God" who, having understood the message of Christ, the message of the Qur'an8, the message of any sacred (and revolutionary) text worthy of the name, put themselves at the service of the Revolution for their people: "A shepherd must be with his flock." Thus it is those who possess a strong spirit - disciplined, self-disciplined, organized, and consistent - who stand with their people. I speak of today's Base Believers9, of those Zapatista priests who in the 1990s put themselves at the service of the people of Chiapas, of those Muslims in Rojava who are fighting reaction alongside their own, alongside their people. I speak of the example of so many heroic and anonymous entities I know little about but who are always there; standing firm, against wind and tide, like an unyielding ship.

It is them I refer to: those people are mine, they are my people. And they are the ones I want at my side on the day of the Revolution. Because they are people who have truly understood what Human Overcoming means - beyond any dogma and institution whose doctrine oppresses rather than liberates. They have understood the message, absorbed it, delved into it. These people are my brothers and sisters, and with them remains all the work of the Revolution.

These words are written by someone agnostic, who doubts the existence of God, who is unable to see a God with a human face in the sky because they already see Him in every moment, in every detail. Within me and everywhere. God is Everything, omnipotent and omnipresent, and perhaps it is something so simple and at the same time so complex to understand that even today we do not fully comprehend it. In the spirit dwells the will to power, and the will to power dwells in the spirit. In our spirit: because we carry a New World in our hearts, and that world is growing right now. In this very moment.

We must not fear ruins, for they are always the foundations of something new: yet to be built.

¹ We also refer here to women, to any person in their human condition. Authors generally speak within the historical and social limits of their time.
² Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional.
³ Such as the FAGC (Federación Anarquista de Gran Canaria).
4 And when I speak of Revolution, I also speak of Freedom, as well as of Equality and Fraternity.
5 I could mention other little-studied examples here. Among them, an interesting medieval precedent in Dulcino stands out. See as an audiovisual approach.
6 Full text here.
7 George Woodcock, Dawn of Anarchism, pp. 20-22.
8 Salvador Gómez Nogales, "Eastern Wisdom and Arab Philosophy," in Andrés Martínez Lorca (ed.), Essays on Philosophy in Al-Andalus (2017), pp. 162-163: "(...) The text of our Muslim compatriot Ibn ?Arabi can summarize everything said: There was a time when I reproached my neighbor if his religion was not close to mine. But my heart is capable of becoming all forms: it is a meadow for gazelles, the cell of a Christian monk, a temple for idols, the tablets of Mosaic Law, the volume of the Qur'an. I profess the religion of love. And wherever the mount turns, love is my creed and my faith."
9 Those who follow the purest (and thus less adulterated, less instrumentalized) teachings of faith.

Bibliography:
Gómez Nogales, S. "Eastern Wisdom and Arab Philosophy," in Andrés Martínez Lorca (ed.), Essays on Philosophy in Al-Andalus (2017), pp. 143-165.
Woodcock, G. Dawn of Anarchism.

https://regeneracionlibertaria.org/2022/04/06/esbozos-para-un-nuevo-pensar-i-revolucion-y-libertad-de-culto/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center