A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #363 - Ecology - Social and Libertarian Ecology: Take Back Control of Production! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Thu, 9 Oct 2025 09:44:57 +0300


The UCL Ecology Commission was invited to the Résistantes and spoke at a roundtable to discuss the takeover of production tools. Our presentation focused on the issue of experiences of companies taken over by workers. Here is a condensed version for Alternative Libertaire. ---- Libertarian communists desire a self-managed democracy at work that would be capable, on a large scale, of deciding what to produce based on our collective needs while taking into account the need for balance with our environment. However, the question of taking back control of production is not only central to any communist movement; it must also be central to the entire environmental movement.

Even the most reformist movements should ask themselves this central question. While the La France Insoumise program, for example, could be a small step in the right direction, it would inevitably encounter fierce opposition from the entire French bourgeoisie, which detests any regulation that might curb its drive for profits. However, the economic (and therefore political) power of this bourgeoisie stems from its ownership of the means of production.

Furthermore, various companies are aware of the growing contradiction between their desire for infinite growth and the finite nature of our planet. They have therefore joined forces to try to implement programs and labels that would give them a central role in their own regulation. Examples include Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), carbon credits, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). All these programs share the common thread of promoting corporate self-regulation as a solution to managing the ecological crises for which they are responsible. Thus, CSR seeks to sell us a vision of dialogue as a process that brings together the various "stakeholders," but in reality, it is a step that validates management's vision of the company.

Isolated Experiences
We must impose our vision from the material realities of our social camp now to challenge the powers that be and their vision of the future.

UCL participated in the roundtable "Reclaiming the Means of Production" and led a surveying workshop to rethink production at the heart of ecology. Around 70 people participated!
Pierre (UCL Caen)
In France and internationally, there are experiences of workers regaining control of their production tools. They are the result of fierce struggles that take place in a context of closure of the production company. Even in the event of victory, they are isolated and often unable to confront capitalism alone. Let's take the example of the "Breton and Solidarity Mask Co-op" in Côtes-d'Armor, which collapsed after the government preferred to turn to China for its orders. Even the factories and services that are resisting are doing so on a smaller scale and often have to transform their struggles by sanitizing them to turn them into marketing pitches.

In Argentina in the early 2000s, similar struggles shook the country on a very large scale as it opened up to international free trade. They led to the rescue of approximately 400 worker-recovered enterprises (ETRs). These ETRs, which now employ 14,000 people, are facing the Milei regime. These experiments in workplace democracy certainly have complex relationships with markets or the state, but they each allow us to ask a central question: what is the social and ecological utility of our work?

It takes a highly organized team to be able to lead these very long and difficult struggles to regain control of production sites and cope with layoffs. Especially since today, ecology has become a new pretext for site closures. In these cases, it is often too late to take union action. Indeed, these sites often fall behind on environmental standards, but above all, employees are affected by devastating occupational illnesses.

UCL held a booth at the Résistantes, offering our press.
Pierre (UCL Caen)
A grassroots union and ecological alliance
Faced with these issues, militant union organizations are organizing to fight back through the Ecological and Social Alliance (AES). This alliance between unions and environmental associations has led to some emblematic struggles in recent years. Following its last Congress, the CGT (Confederation of Labor and Employment) left this framework. In the wake of this, the UGICT (management union within the CGT) launched a Work-Environment Radar with the engineering association Pour un réveil écologique (For an Ecological Awakening), whose goal is to intervene at the request of the CSEs to conduct workplace assessments.

These kinds of top-down alliances are good things, but they are not enough. We must act at the grassroots level now. Unions with aging teams need environmental activists. We have seen that business recovery experiments cannot exist without organizational capacity and therefore combative union teams. We must unionize and be involved for the long term. We must also avoid the trap of bullshit dialogue, as in the CSR approach discussed earlier: we have much more to gain by investing at the interprofessional level, particularly in local unions, many of which are now in danger of disappearing. Indeed, if we want to build a grassroots red/green alliance, it's not enough to tell environmental groups to approach the unions. There must be people at the local level to work with them.

The contradictions of capitalism in the face of ecological crises are worsening day by day, and we must adapt our strategies accordingly. To transform these contradictions into opportunities for struggle, we will need trained union teams capable of anticipating problems before the employer. We will also need solid alliances, which must be built now at the grassroots level, with environmental groups so that they too can play their part in business recovery. These alliances are not an end in themselves but examples, a way to believe once again in our strength and in a world free from the exploitation of bosses.

Corentin (UCL Kreiz-Breizh)

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Ecologie-sociale-et-libertaire-Reprendre-en-main-la-production
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center