A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #362 - Politics - Odile Maurin (Handi-social): "Will the choice to die truly be free?" (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:39:56 +0300


Odile Maurin is an anti-disability activist within the Handi-social association, which she chairs. She was an active participant in the Yellow Vest movement. She discusses her opposition to the bill on the right to "assisted dying," which she considers dangerous for people with disabilities. ---- Legislating on the end of life is not new in France; can you give us a brief history? ---- The legal framework began in 1999 with the right to pain relief and palliative care. In 2002, the Kouchner Law established the right to designate a trusted person[1]. In 2005, the Leonetti Law was the first specific law on end-of-life. It prohibited unreasonable obstinacy and made it possible to draft advance directives, which allow patients to express their wishes regarding end-of-life decisions in the event that they can no longer do so themselves. In 2016, the Claeys-Leonetti Law created new rights for patients and those nearing the end of their lives: it reaffirmed the importance of anticipated conditions, strengthened the role of trusted persons, and allowed patients to request access to deep and continuous sedation until death.

And what is the background to the current bill?

The demand for the right to die in France is not new; as early as the late 1970s, Michel Lee Landa published an op-ed in Le Monde demanding this right.

The 2023 Citizens' Convention on End-of-Life rekindled the debate, which is gaining momentum. The selection criteria for this convention could have encouraged the participation of those most affected-people who are sick and disabled. But they were never truly questioned, as if their experiences were irrelevant. In 2024, a bill on patient support and end-of-life care was to be debated in the National Assembly, but the dissolution disrupted the parliamentary calendar. In January 2025, the new Prime Minister announced a bill split in two, with palliative care on one side and end-of-life care on the other. It was adopted in May by the National Assembly and will be debated in the Senate in October.

Have you always been against euthanasia?

No. I myself was affected by the end of my mother's life, for whom I was a caregiver. She died in the 1980s after a devastating bout of Parkinson's disease. She begged me to help her die, but I didn't have the courage. In response, I became an activist and then joined the Association for the Right to Die with Dignity (ADMD) in 2015, which exploited my guilt toward my mother.

I completely changed my mind, firstly, with the triage of patients during COVID. They selected who to treat and who not to treat based on the degree of dependence on a third party[2]. I saw that they had decided to sacrifice the elderly and disabled; it was delusional. Then there was the death of Alain Cocq, whom I had known for ten years. This activist was led by the ADMD to commit suicide in Switzerland, and the association exploited his physical and mental suffering without taking into account his psychological fragility. Yet he had already backtracked several times on the end of his life. Rather than helping him live, the ADMD pushed him to die.

An opposition municipal and metropolitan councilor in Toulouse since 2020 with the political collective For a Popular and Social Ecology (PEPS), Odile Maurin suffers from a lack of suitable accommodations that exhausts her to the point of considering resigning. She continues to fight against ableism and for inclusion.
Odile Maurin
The euthanasia law is presented as a response to a demand, what do you think?

There is nothing to support this supposed demand. The ADMD operates on emotional testimonies, and there are no serious studies on the subject. The right to palliative care has existed since 1999, but it is still not implemented: 21 departments do not have a palliative care unit[3], and in 2012, of all the people who could have benefited from it, only 20% had access[4].

There is a lack of services, resources, and, above all, staff trained in pain management and deep, continuous sedation. Before proclaiming a new "freedom," we must first guarantee the existing right to palliative care. The palliative care law passed by the National Assembly in May remains insufficient: the budget, which is a ten-year plan, does not even meet immediate needs[5].

Why do anti-validism groups claim that this is not a social advancement?

What worries us is what has happened in all the other countries that have legalized euthanasia: there has been a systematic, progressive broadening of eligibility criteria. The proponents of this law clearly claim to want to implement a foot-in-the-door strategy[6]: we must obtain the principle of the right to kill for doctors, and the rest will happen peacefully.

Society has a perception of us that directly affects our living conditions. For example, Kamil, a fellow myopath at Handi-social, was offered deep and continuous sedation until death following the doctor's difficulty adjusting his ventilator. He resisted and is still alive.

Our living conditions are so precarious that one wonders if the choice to die will truly be free. It will be much easier to die than to have access to a dignified life. Poverty and medical abuse are imposed on us. I struggle, for example, to find caregivers because they are poorly paid, and they often look for "better" work elsewhere. The waiting lists for pain relief centers are endless. It's not our illnesses, pathologies, or disabilities that discourage us from wanting to live, but the living conditions we are forced to endure and the failure of social organization to adapt to our needs.

There's been a lot of talk recently about restrictions on long-term conditions (ALD) or the delisting of medications for the chronically ill. Do you see a link with this end-of-life law?

The link is ableism. The government is attacking the systems that allow sick and disabled people to live. They want to restrict long-term conditions by removing reimbursement for some medications. However, many treatments are already not reimbursed, and these are heavy expenses for those affected.

The same goes for the adult disability allowance (AAH) and the disability compensation benefit (PCH): for years, the conditions for obtaining these benefits have been tightening, and departments are doing everything they can to limit them.

We are raised to believe that we are a burden to our loved ones, and the lack of compensation for our disabilities exhausts them. All of this creates social pressure to die. You are then given the opportunity to "depart with dignity" without ever having had the opportunity to live with dignity. It is an unheard-of violence.

Interview by Antoine (UCL Alsace)

Confirm

[1]The trusted person, designated by the patient, accompanies them throughout their care. They are consulted as a priority to assert the patient's wishes if they can no longer express themselves. The new bill makes this consultation optional.

[2]Florence Aubenas, "Bienvenue en Alsace, à Coronaland," Le Monde, April 26, 2020.

[3]Victor Mérat, "End of life: which departments lack palliative care units?" ", Le Figaro, April 26, 2024.

[4]"Report on the public debate concerning the end of life," National Consultative Ethics Committee (CCNE), October 2014.

[5]"Is the planned increase in the palliative care budget sufficient?", Collectif-jabs.fr, June 21, 2025.

[6]This strategy was presented by Jean-Louis Touraine, member of the ADMD honorary committee, in a public conference available on YouTube: Le Choix - Public conference of 11/30/24.

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Odile-Maurin-Handi-social-Le-choix-de-mourir-sera-t-il-reellement-libre
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center