A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, UCADI, #198 - The cheerful geese (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 12 Aug 2025 07:12:37 +0300


In the information on international politics and in particular on the events concerning the war in Ukraine and the Middle East, two "cheerful geese" play an important role - among the many experts passed off as neutral and objective in their analyses - who regularly appear on various television networks and dominate the mainstream information in our country. We are referring to the director of a well-known institute of political studies that, although presenting itself as a scientific and research body, is in reality a propaganda tool of the most orthodox and biased Atlanticist West and to another researcher from the same institute who is also a member of the European Leadership Network (ELN), particularly violent and biased in expressing her hatred.
Among the many experts who are used, our attention focuses on these for two reasons: first, they tend to represent themselves as bearers of objective, scientific analyses, supported by knowledge and study of the facts and events of international politics, as "experts", but they develop an extremely biased analysis, without declaring it, indeed doing everything to present their arguments and conclusions as objective.
Their belonging to the female gender is used, by them and by those who use them, to convey particularly biased and violent contents, presented under an aspect of common sense and reasonableness, which would belong to the logic and balanced opinions of good mothers, and this in order to make the statements supported credible and objective.
We have nothing against, of course, experts of different political stripes bringing their analyses to the attention of public opinion - convinced as we are that knowledge arises from the comparison of opinions - but when their positions are biased and preconceived, even if not declared as such, these self-styled analysts would do well not to call themselves neutral, political scientists, they would do well to declare their biased position, even when the statements they make, the theses they support are clearly so.
The fact is that these people have given themselves the role of the geese of the Capitol who, seeing and sensing the enemy's arrival, quack, so as to raise the alarm to induce those they believe to be the attacked to react: they are geese inserted in a war perspective that play a precise and paid role on behalf of the war propaganda of the political area to which they belong.
The fact is that the real existence of the enemy is yet to be demonstrated because it must be explained how and why Russia, a country with an immense territory, very rich in raw materials, poor in population, barely 150 million inhabitants, should invade Europe with a population of 450 million inhabitants to dominate but without energy resources and raw materials and therefore to support.
Unable to explain this contradiction, the brilliant analysts are careful not to pose the problem and to try to give a minimally rational answer, but they commit themselves with the complicity of a battalion of comrades, men and women journalists who are also biased, to provide information aimed at influencing public opinion, by definition made up of a shapeless mass of imbeciles who would allow themselves to be oriented and directed towards the most abject and irrational objectives by individuals nested in the columns of La Stampa or Corriere della Sera as well as La Repubblica.
If these geese and their cronies are so concerned about the fate of the European peoples and their freedom, they should be consistent: yes, they should arm themselves and leave for the front, ready to go down into the trenches to defend beloved Ukraine and its illiberal, oligarchic and corrupt regime, just like the Russian one or the neo-Nazi-Zionist criminals who are exterminating the Palestinians. It is too easy to stay in the rear and incite others to take up arms, to go down into the field and fight, risking their lives in defense of the so-called values of the West, a reheated, indigestible and indigestible soup, to be fed to fools to mask a policy of domination of the people.

https://www.ucadi.org/2025/06/22/cosa-ce-di-nuovo-le-oche-giulive/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center