A-Infos (en) Italy, UCADI, #198 - Trump and his proxies (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

With hasty superficiality, Trump's foreign policy on Ukraine and the 
Middle East has been defined as a failure: his promise to put an end to 
both conflicts in a short period of time has failed. Putin and Netanyahu 
would have succeeded in imposing their choices and their times. What is 
happening raises the doubt that this is not the case at all and that the 
much-maligned TACO (Trump Always Chicken Out) is the one who is dealing 
the cards. In other words, Trump is a coward, someone who backs down in 
the face of difficulties, who announces duties and then withdraws them 
at the first retaliation; a coward. It is worth reflecting on the 
dynamics and characteristics of both the "Spider's web" operation 
carried out by the Ukrainians, and the "Rising Lion" operation to attack 
Iran. If we look closely, the points of contact, the methods of 
execution, a set of characteristics, and above all the effects, they 
definitely have many points in common, even though the American 
president claims to be extraneous to their execution.
The truth is different Trump is a liar who lies knowing he is lying, one 
who strikes and hides his hand, who conducts foreign policy in the 
United States with unprecedented unscrupulousness, having learned and 
internalized the use of proxies, no more and no less than other actors 
on the international level have done for years. While other states have 
given life to guerrilla movements, have fueled political parties, have 
formed fifth columns within the states they intended to destabilize, the 
United States and its allies used different operational methods of 
destabilization: there are countless guerrilla movements organized in 
Latin America and Africa and lavishly financed, but they know about 
organized and supported coups d'état, the so-called orange revolutions 
are well known, which even recently have brightened the democratic life 
of European states, making themselves standard-bearers of the values of 
Western democracy.
This varied arsenal is composed of instruments of international and 
power politics and has recently been enriched by two further refined 
instruments constituted by the aforementioned operations which, upon 
closer inspection, present similar characteristics and in fact use the 
same operational instruments to achieve their purpose, which is to 
support the official action of the State, its international policy, with 
hybrid instruments of pressure that are part of the arsenal of 
asymmetric warfare conducted with unscrupulousness by States as a 
substitute element to their power politics.

The latest of this operation in chronological order, conducted however 
still with traditional methods, was constituted by the action carried 
out by Turkey which supported and fomented the guerrilla movements 
operating in Syrian territory, supporting them to the point of producing 
the necessary critical mass of power to overthrow the Assad regime, also 
thanks to the betrayal of the military leaders, the weariness of the 
populations, the change in the balance of power at an international 
level and the weakening of Russian support for the Syrian regime, 
directly and primarily involved in the war in Ukraine.

Operation "Spider's Web"

Operation "Spider's Web" carried out by the Ukrainian secret services 
undoubtedly represents a qualitative leap in the operational capacity of 
a secret service engaged in hybrid warfare against a nuclear superpower. 
While the client of the war, the United States, conducted an action of 
apparent mediation between the parties aimed at resolving the conflict, 
although they were the main actors and clients of the war action, long 
prepared with the events of Maidan Square and an orange insurrection, 
the secret services of the vassal state, developed a terrorist action 
that targeted the strategic bombers that are part of the nuclear 
response triad of the Russian superpower.
The action was prepared through an infiltration operation in enemy 
territory, the use of offensive weapons, drones, which due to their 
versatility can be used as tools of a terrorist action, but at high 
intensity. The aim of the operation is to demonstrate to the enemy the 
unpredictability of war action, the impossibility of containing and 
controlling the enemy's initiative, which acts with a wild variable, 
without placing any limit on the consequences of its own action, 
demonstrating that the desperation resulting from defeat on the 
battlefield of a traditional war, places it in the condition of having 
nothing to lose and of not placing any limits on its action, with the 
threat, not even so veiled, of lasting over time, regardless of the 
persistence of the conflict between States. The message that the 
operation "Spider's web" intends to convey is that even if Ukraine is 
defeated on the battlefield, as long as it exists as a political entity, 
it will always be able to conduct aggressive actions against Russia, 
threatening its integrity and social peace, with a war without quarter, 
in time and space.
It is therefore appropriate that at the negotiating table Russia comes 
to a more moderate opinion, accepting the mediation of Trump, who at the 
negotiating table offers himself as the only guarantor capable of 
keeping his proxy at bay. But to do so he needs to be able to offer a 
compromise solution to the conflict.
While at the negotiating table the Americans appear quiescent, they are 
in fact leaving to the English and the Ukrainians, or rather to their 
proxies, the task of carrying out and developing the counteraction 
necessary to bend the enemy to the negotiation. This explains what Trump 
says and does not say when he refers to the operation carried out by the 
Ukrainians, which he claims to be unaware of, while it is not credible 
that this occurred without the knowledge and approval of the US secret 
services and himself.

Operation "Rising Lion"

A closer look at Operation "Rising Lion" shows the same characteristics. 
Conceived as a terrorist action, it uses the Israeli proxy as an agent, 
which uses infiltration into the enemy camp through the organization of 
sabotage actions, targeted killings, destabilization of air defense 
structures, information on targets, weakening of warning systems and 
uses force and direct military intervention as a conclusive action and 
operational seal of the terrorist action implemented, which has 
prevention and dissuasive purposes.
Even in this case, apparently, the instigator, the United States, 
appears to be unaware of everything, even offering themselves as 
mediators between the parties, only to then define the action carried 
out as excellent, after the fact. In this case, the respective roles of 
the proxies and the instigator are exposed and evident, because already 
while the attack is underway the United States offers Iran to resume the 
negotiations in progress, interrupted by the war action, openly 
declaring that this will prevent them from suffering greater and more 
serious damage from the hybrid war action carried out against them, 
moreover clearly supported by the military action of support developed 
during the Israeli war actions against Iran by the United States and its 
allies, moved by the sense of guilt towards Israel, to which the name of 
the holocaust perpetrated against the Jews, everything is forgiven, 
including the genocide against the inhabitants of Gaza as well as the 
Palestinians. In reality, the reasons for the support of Israel by the 
United States are constituted by the deep economic ties that bind the 
two States, by the strategic role played by Israel in guarding an area 
whose control is essential to perpetuate the imperial role of the United 
States.

The two scenarios

The answer to what has happened and is happening is not yet clear, 
because the events are too recent, but if as regards the war in Ukraine 
a first Russian response comes from the battlefield, where the army of 
the Federation continues to advance like an inexorable steamroller, it 
has opened a further front in the province of Sumy, threatens to lay 
siege to the city and, bypassing it, to descend into the new direction 
of operations up to the Dnipro, cutting Ukraine in two. The Donbass 
front is on the verge of collapse, ?????????????, besieged from three 
directions is on the verge of falling and this would determine the 
general retreat of the front. The attack on Kramators'k and Sloviansk is 
not far away. These successes on the battlefield explain the reasons for 
Ukraine's recourse to terrorism which risks producing a reaction from 
Russia as a response. There are those who hypothesize in the future the 
physical elimination, through a hybrid and no-holds-barred war, of the 
Ukrainian secret service cells, which would have the effect of producing 
an endemic war, projected in time, which risks constituting a 
characteristic trait of the living conditions of the European peoples as 
it directly involves them. In other words, the war on the ground in 
Ukraine may also end with an armistice and a peace but the nationalists 
Ukrainians will be eliminated one by one by Russian anti-terrorism and 
in turn will lead a war without quarter that will bloody the regions of 
Europe and the world for years to come.
The scenario that emerges with regard to the confrontation between 
Israel and Iran is not very different. Israel's choice to aim for a 
subversion of the political regime in force in Iran, supported by 
Israeli weapons, appears completely unrealistic and destined to fail, 
and does not constitute the "final solution" to the problem, however 
much it may count on fifth columns hypothetically present in the 
country. Israel's intervention now comes too late and not so much with 
respect to the Iranian project, completely hypothetical to equip itself 
with a nuclear weapon, but in light of the capacity matured by the 
Iranian military apparatus to defend itself, even if with armaments that 
exclude the use of nuclear weapons. The bombings with conventional 
weapons such as ballistic missiles, promptly obscured by the Israeli 
government with regard to their devastating effects, have demonstrated 
that Iran has matured the capacity to saturate the Israeli defense 
system by penetrating it and producing significant destruction and not a 
few victims among the population. The ability to sustain a constant and 
destructive war has emerged clearly, difficult for Israel to sustain 
both for the cost it entails but even more for the constant threat it 
represents. As much as Israel may plan to build a greater Israel, Iran 
is a country of 90 million inhabitants, with an immense territory, 
especially if compared to that of Israel, and therefore the solution to 
the problems lies only in peaceful coexistence and in the search for a 
coexistence agreement that simultaneously protects the rights of all the 
peoples of the region. The inalienable rights of the Palestinian people 
are inescapable: if one does not want to accept the idea of the 
existence of two States and two peoples that divide the territory on 
which to live, the only other solution is to create an 
inter-confessional entity that allows all the inhabitants of the region 
to live peacefully. But this would be the end of Zionism as a political 
doctrine and as an aspiration of Jewish nationalism and at the same time 
It would force Muslims to review their vision of peaceful coexistence 
and religious freedom, perhaps returning to the Millet system, as in the 
times of the Ottoman Empire or at the origin of the Jewish state. On the 
current basis, the objective of the American administration seems to be 
to manage a modus operandi between the parties involving Putin's Russia 
as a guarantee, as an ally of Iran but at the same time holder of a 
special, historical relationship with the Israeli state, thereby 
legitimizing the role of manager of a multipolar balance of Russia, to 
the detriment and discreet of the role of Europe, considered a bunch of 
foolish servants, devoid of any subjectivity and ability to represent 
their own interests. It is useless to note that the one who is 
humiliated by this crisis is the EU in the person of Ursula fon der 
Stupid and the idiot Kaia Kallas who have once again demonstrated their 
substantial inconsistency.

G. C.

https://www.ucadi.org/2025/06/22/trump-e-i-suoi-proxy/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en