A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #19-25 - China: the capitalist dragon (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 29 Jul 2025 07:13:20 +0300


China's historical development has followed a different path from that of the part of the world where we live, which saw first the slave society, then the feudal one and then the capitalist one. Within this historical scheme, China is difficult to classify. Its thousand-year history also has repercussions on the current situation; China's inconsistencies with the capitalist model typical of Anglo-American imperialism and its allies are often simplistically explained by attributing the Chinese model the label of "socialist". If there were any need, the latest measures adopted by the Chinese Communist Party and government demonstrate that China, far from socialism, is following its own model of capitalist development.

Last May, in fact, the central committee of the Communist Party and the Chinese government jointly developed new economic guidelines; these guidelines aim to "transform more state-owned and private companies into innovative, resilient and globally competitive companies with modern corporate governance structures", says the South China Morning Post. The 2035 goal for a more refined corporate governance system also aligns with China's broader modernization goals for that year, which the Chinese government sees as essential to catching up with the United States.

China's governance structure, called modern in the document, will be established in about five years. The interim goal will help companies contribute to innovation and industrial upgrades and fulfill social responsibilities.

Special attention is given to scientific and market-oriented management, improving governance at listed companies, and engaging institutional investors as active shareholders.

The new guidelines complement other central guidance. In March, China's Ministry of Commerce and the National Development and Reform Commission, its top economic planner, released a document setting a goal of having 100 Chinese companies lead digital and AI-related supply chains within five years to strengthen resilience and security in critical industries.

Beijing's push comes as China's biggest companies have lost ground to their US rivals. In 2024, mainland China and Hong Kong had 128 companies on the Fortune 500 list, while the US had 139 companies on the list, a reversal after Chinese companies dethroned their US counterparts in 2019.

Total profits of state-owned enterprises contracted 4.4% in the first four months of 2025, after falling 4.6% in 2024. Private firms, on the other hand, saw their profits rise 4.3% between January and April.

According to a widely accepted definition, state-owned enterprises in the People's Republic of China (PRC) are a key element of the economic system, which is based on the principle of "socialist public ownership of the means of production." This means that despite the opening up of a market economy, a significant part of China's economy is still controlled by the state, with state-owned enterprises playing an important role in various sectors; The government has given them a role that goes beyond simple profit and reflects the continued influence of the state in the economy. But these new guidelines now state that enterprises that are large but not strong and profitable will be rigorously reformed in line with modern corporate governance.

Private enterprises will be given greater autonomy in adopting flexible governance structures, and entrepreneurs will be able to run their businesses without excessive state interference, although there is a point in the document where it calls for strengthening the Party's leadership.

In April, China passed a law to promote the private economy and give enterprises hit by US tariffs greater legal protection against fines and interference that the Chinese government calls arbitrary.

Let's take a step back to understand how misplaced the attribute of socialist bestowed on China's economic reality is.

In 1953, four years had passed since the victory of the People's Liberation Army over Chiang Kai-shek and in that same year that same Army had intervened to defend Korea invaded by the USA and their allies. In that year, Mao Zedong, then President of the People's Republic of China, defined the Chinese economy as follows: "The capitalist economy in China today is a capitalist economy that is, for the most part, under the control of the people's government, is linked in various ways with the state-run socialist economy, and is under the supervision of the workers. It is no longer an ordinary capitalist economy, but a capitalist economy of a special kind, namely, a new type of state capitalist economy. It exists primarily not for the profit of the capitalists but to meet the needs of the people and the state. Of course, some of the profit earned by the workers still goes to the capitalists, but it represents only a small portion of the total profit, about one-fourth, while the remaining three-fourths go to the workers (as welfare funds), to the state (as taxes), and to expand production facilities (including a small portion that yields profit to the capitalists). It follows that this new type of state capitalist economy has a notable socialist character and is advantageous to the workers and the state." State."
This definition could also apply to today's China, except that more than seventy years have passed since Mao wrote these lines, China's productive forces have seen an unthinkable development, but this development of the productive forces, rather than leading to the destruction of capitalist production relations, has led to the extension of these relations to all production and distribution. Today 75% of production is ensured by capitalist enterprises, while state enterprises are limited to 25%. The search for maximum profit is also the guiding light that inspires the guidelines approved last May, while the role of the Communist Party within the production units is to ensure their profitability, that is, the ability to produce profits.
But more than in industry, the advance of capitalism is significant in agriculture and healthcare, where, the first attempts at socialization, were soon replaced by the logic of capital.
In the aftermath of the victory in the civil war, the government abolished private ownership of land, which became state property, and collectivized agriculture through farmers' cooperatives. From 1958 onwards, the Chinese Communist Party, under the leadership of Mao Zedong, criticized the Soviet model of development based on heavy industry and focused on the rapid transformation of production relations in the countryside in a communist sense, accompanied by support for small rural industry. Thousands of people's communes were created: the over 740,000 agricultural production cooperatives merged into 26,000 people's communes comprising 120 million families. This type of organization, in the intention of its creators, was not limited to being an economic unit, but was also a basic organization of state power. Furthermore, it was the response to the needs of the great leap forward which required a greater extension of land units. The commune was to achieve the collectivization of life, including the most basic forms of human existence, and thereby prepare the transition from the socialist to the communist system. Free markets and private fields previously assigned to families were abolished within them. In 1984, as part of the reforms promoted during Deng's presidency, the people's communes were definitively abolished and collective units were progressively reduced. In 1985, the transfer of crop quotas to the State was replaced by the system of negotiated purchase contracts, a system with which taxes replaced crop quotas. This evolution was legitimized by the 1993 constitutional amendment that formally replaced the communes with a system of contractual responsibility. This system still requires the State to entrust the management of the land to individual heads of families by means of contracts.
Healthcare has also seen a similar evolution. The history of the health service in the PRC can be divided into four periods.
The first phase began with the seizure of power by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949. The state owned and provided all health services, and health professionals were its employees. One feature that was quite successful in this phase was the use of so-called barefoot doctors to provide essential public health services and primary care in rural villages. Between 1952 and 1982, infant mortality rates in China dropped from 200 to 34 per 1,000 live births, and diseases such as schistosomiasis, which had plagued the country for centuries, were almost completely eradicated. A new phase began in 1984. The health system was also involved in the reforms desired by the government to convert China into a market economy. Government funding of hospitals was dramatically reduced, and many health workers, including barefoot doctors, lost their government subsidies. The government still owned the hospitals, but had little control over the health organizations, which operated as for-profit entities in an unregulated market. Most people remained uninsured, as the government did not provide any coverage and there were no private insurance companies. In 1999, only 49 percent of the urban population had health insurance, mostly from state-run or government-run enterprises, and only 7 percent of the rural population had any form of coverage.

A new phase began in 2003, when the Chinese government introduced insurance to cover hospital costs for rural residents. Unsurprisingly, the 2003 reforms were not enough to address the deep-seated problems in China's health care system.

Since 2008, the health system has continued to be mainly market-based, but since 2012, a government-funded insurance system has started to provide 95% of the population with very modest coverage. The government has also made efforts to create a primary care system.

In addition to the data from industry, the data from agriculture and health care show that the Chinese government is oriented towards liquidating what remains of socialist structures in the country, avoiding critical steps such as those that led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Tiziano Antonelli18

https://umanitanova.org/cina-il-drago-capitalista/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center