A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, Livorno, FAI: A punctual drone, Italy's new military missions approved - Umanità Nova on 17/3/24 (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:27:28 +0300


Last February 26, the Council of Ministers resolved on military missions abroad. In record time, not even 10 days, Parliament discussed and approved the resolution. ---- 12,000 soldiers will be engaged abroad in new and extended missions, for 1.5 billion in spending. In previous years, several weeks, even months, elapsed between government resolution and parliamentary approval. Times that the government has tried to further accelerate, trying - without succeeding - to pass the approval in an emergency procedure, to avoid discussion in the competent commissions. Certainly, the barrage of six shots fired from the 72/67 Oto Melara cannon of the Caio Duilio destroyer which shot down a Yemeni drone 6 km away also put pressure on parliament. Close to the parliamentary discussion, the risk of a military escalation and the relentless campaign on the threat of the Houthis for the Italian ships present in the Red Sea, made it necessary to have an authorization framework for the naval mission that Italy had already been conducting for December. All this certainly gave the possibility of forcing an approval in record time.

The three approved missions are the Aspides mission, a naval mission in the Red Sea, the Levante mission, which is part of the war in Gaza in Palestine, and the EUAM Ukraine mission. Considering that this last mission has actually been active since December 2014 and the current approval only concerns the sending of a magistrate as part of a European mission to support the security system, we will focus mainly on the first two.

The Aspides mission is a European Union mission, launched in February, whose command is entrusted to Greece and is based in Larissa, Italy managed to secure only the tactical command of the operational forces, of which it was Rear Admiral Stefano Costantino was in charge and has its own center on board the Caio Duilio.

The new mission is presented as a new operational commitment within a more general extension of a "multi-domain device". The fact sheet on the operation in fact brings together four distinct missions, the aforementioned Aspides, the EU-led Atalanta mission off the coast of Somalia, the multinational EMASOH in the Strait of Hormuz and the US-led CMF. The precise authorization of men and vehicles for the Aspides mission is therefore not specified in the government resolution, but the overall commitment for the four missions is indicated: 3 naval vehicles, 5 air vehicles, 642 personnel units. Of course, seeing 3 ships engaged in 4 different missions makes you think of Mussolini's famous tanks, but attributing everything to quackery and propaganda - which is certainly not lacking - would be misleading. In this shell game there is a clear attempt to make the decision-making process more opaque and the responsibility for each individual mission less defined. An authorization like this leaves the government a free hand to divide the missions into different interventions depending on needs. Just think of the area of intervention authorized for these missions, which is incredibly vast: "Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea and coastal countries, Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, Somali basin, Mozambique Channel, Indian Ocean, Strait of Hormuz, Persian Gulf , Gulf of Oman, Bahrain, Djibouti, United Arab Emirates and other coastal countries". These are four naval missions of a different nature and with different rules, which would also interact with land missions.

Similarly, with the Levante mission, a very general military commitment was authorized, and we still need to understand how it will be structured. The official press focused on the first two points of the mission's objectives, aid to the civilian population and the provision of a "field hospital and a naval unit with healthcare capacity". But the second two are not usually mentioned: "precautionary measures for the possible evacuation of compatriots or the extraction of Italian forces from the region; strengthen the presence in the Eastern Mediterranean". More than a humanitarian aid mission, it appears to be a mission with the aim of consolidating the military presence in the area and coordinating any emergency situations linked to the substantial presence of Italian contingents, which to varying degrees are engaged in Lebanon, the West Bank and Egypt. For this mission, the deployment of a naval vehicle, an air vehicle, 10 ground vehicles and 192 military personnel is authorized.

The area of intervention is also very vast in this case, and includes "Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Cyprus, UAE, Qatar and the Eastern Mediterranean region".

I don't think we can think that these generic terms are imposed by rapid approval times, which on the contrary would require the authorization of a more precise and defined commitment. The way in which the forms for these two missions were prepared actually seems to have been well prepared to anticipate the new authorization procedures for military missions that the government would like to introduce. The amendment to law 145 of 2016 which regulates the matter was proposed by the government with DDL S. 1020, a reform bill approved by the Council of Ministers on 25 January. Among the main points of this proposal, now being examined by the Chambers, we first highlight what was written in the technical report upon presentation of the proposal to the Senate. The reform would introduce "Greater flexibility in the use of structures and personnel units within missions belonging to the same geographical area. By foreseeing in advance the possible "interoperability" between missions in the same area and subjecting them to the preventive scrutiny of the Chambers, the modification allows us to respond more promptly in the event of crisis or emergency situations, which are increasingly frequent in the current international scenario". Furthermore, it would make it possible to "pre-identify, through Government resolutions[...]forces with high and very high operational readiness, to be used abroad in the event of a crisis or emergency situation[...]in the event that it becomes necessary to emergency use of high and very high operational readiness forces, the Government's resolution is in any case transmitted to the Chambers, which, within five days, with specific guidance documents, according to the respective regulations, authorize their use or deny them authorization".

The first point, by providing for greater flexibility, would undoubtedly make the policy of military missions abroad more opaque, making it more difficult to understand the scope, responsibilities and actual limits of the authorizations. In this way it is easier for the government to shuffle the cards, to articulate military operations in a different way by exploiting the coverage of already authorized missions with vague purposes and for very large areas. The second point would give the government a free hand to take the initiative for a military expedition. This has already been happening for years, with missions authorized by Parliament months after the actual start. This measure, with the excuse of bringing procedures back to normal, gives the government greater power.

That the government wants to extend the powers of the government, bringing the current excesses into legality, and that it presents as effectively interoperable missions that until now were presented as specific interventions conducted autonomously, clearly represents where the war policy that the government is leading carrying forward with the transversal support of the main oppositions. If the missions are no longer individual interventions but a strategic campaign, if the government does not act in derogation, but assumes greater powers, further steps are taken towards open war. What will stop this spiral of war will not be laws and elections, but social struggles and anti-militarism.

Dario Antonelli

https://collettivoanarchico.noblogs.org/post/2024/03/16/un-drone-puntuale-approvate-le-nuove-missioni-militari-dellitalia/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center