A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, OCL CA #338 - At the SNCF, things are going off the rails! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Fri, 29 Mar 2024 10:22:54 +0300


An incident, which occurred on the night of January 19 to 20, 2024 in very cold weather, caused talk of the Paris-Clermont railway line: while this journey is supposed to last three hours, the breakdown of a locomotive left 700 travelers without water , electricity or heating for eleven hours. A "nightmare" which, widely relayed by social networks and the media, led the Minister of Ecological Transition Christophe Béchu to summon the CEO of SNCF Jean-Pierre Farandou to ask him for a "plan of concrete and immediate measures"... within fifteen days. He can always dream.

"Is the SNCF Paris - Clermont-Ferrand line really the worst in France?», questioned 20 minutes on January 24. This line frequented by nearly 2 million travelers was already one, in 2011, of the 12 "sick, saturated or problem lines" listed by the SNCF itself; in 2023, it counted 121 delays of more than one hour, 33 of more than two hours and 38 train cancellations.
In addition, the latest spectacular incident on this route did not beat its record, established in 2019, where a train took fourteen hours to complete it. On the other hand, what has changed - at the national level, and no longer just locally - is that delays have lost their exceptional character in the eyes of everyone. Thus Frédéric Aguilera, vice-president of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region in charge of transport, admits: "Today the equipment is so rotten that it is a mess.» And the general director of Intercités adds: "The equipment is so exhausted that every day we bet that it will hold up[1].» And the SNCF spokesperson admits: "There are so many under-investments that have not been made for years that we pay the price at some point.»

According to the collective "Clermont-Paris train users", the repeated material breakdowns on this section are due to "the obsolescence of the railway infrastructure" and "the failure of the equipment", the trains being over forty years old and locomotives over thirty years old. But we can draw the same assessment from other lines since, again according to the SNCF spokesperson, the Paris-Clermont connection in fact only occupies third place among French "galley lines". In first position, there is Bordeaux-Marseille, with 26.6% of trains arriving late at their destination last year; then we find Lyon-Nantes, with 21% delays. And, after Paris-Clermont, he cites Paris-Limoges-Toulouse (see the following article).
But what is behind this decline in "SNCF quality" - and in particular on the Intercités lines? Above all, the progressive reorganization by the SNCF of its "main line" services around the TGV alone. Before the appearance of this "high-speed train", the Intercités lines formed the backbone of the railway network, and they were an important regional planning tool by connecting the populations of metropolises and those of medium-sized towns[2]. Their disappearance in favor of more expensive routes which erase the stations by no longer stopping the trains conversely constantly reinforces territorial segregation.
In addition, the SNCF has organized its own competition, now offering car to home services, carpooling, regular coaches, etc. By diluting the railway activity in a more global "mobility" offer, it has aligned its policy with the "Road rather than rail" consensus in vogue in ruling circles.

On February 15, 2018, Jean-Cyril Spinetta, former CEO of Air France, presented Edouard Philippe, then Prime Minister, with a report on the future of rail transport[3]. He recommended, among other things: the refocusing of rail transport on TGV services between the main French metropolises; the modernization of "everyday trains in urban and peri-urban areas"; examining the maintenance of small lines with regard to their cost; a new status for the SNCF - the previous one dating from... 2014; the gradual disappearance of "railway workers" status, with plans for voluntary departure for two years.
The recommendations in this report were not surprising: they were inspired by "recipes" previously applied to other public companies - from France Telecom to EDF via La Poste. The government immediately took them on board, and announced the opening of a period of consultation with the unions with a view to their implementation. SNCF became a public limited company; the railway lines, and even the management of the network, have been opened to competition; the end of the "railway workers" status has been planned, as well as the elimination of services deemed unprofitable[4]...

From the Thatcher years to the Blair years, the United Kingdom set an example in terms of privatization and liberalization of public services. Water, rail, telecommunications, gas and electricity, post office, urban transport, prisons... everything has been there, apart from the national public health service, the NHS.
From the 1990s, the former public service British Rail was divided into pieces which were sold; the railway network and the management of the lines were dissociated, and the management of the lines itself was divided into several regional concessions; the train fleet has been entrusted to separate companies, which rent them at high prices to the line operators, providing their shareholders with millions in guaranteed profits from year to year...
But the privatization of the British rail network quickly degenerated: problems of coordination and loss of expertise led to numerous incidents - until the Hatfield train disaster which, in 2000, cost the lives of four people. The government found itself forced to renationalize the network in 2002, and it never attempted to re-privatize it.
The repeated bankruptcies and scandals did not stop there, because they also concerned the management of the lines themselves. Indeed, although train prices in the United Kingdom are among the highest in Europe (according to the British Department of Transport, they have increased by more than 23% since privatization in real terms, therefore taking into account the 'inflation), the quality of the rail service is as bad as that of the service provided in France by the SNCF: delays and cancellations of trains, crowded and dilapidated wagons... Also, in a 2017 survey carried out for the "We Own It" campaign» ("It Belongs to Us"), which pushes for the renationalisation or remunicipalisation of public services in the United Kingdom, 76% of British respondents said they were in favor of a return to public control of the railway system as a whole.
In France, the leaders did not opt for an all-out privatization of the former public monopolies, but for their transformation. Air France, France Télécom, EDF-GDF, La Poste, SNCF, etc., have become commercial companies placed under more or less diluted control of the State, and which have profited both from their rent-seeking situation in France and government protection to expand abroad, including acquiring services privatized by other countries.
The law for a new railway pact passed in June 2018 thus enabled the "financial consolidation" of the SNCF Group: the State took over its debt to the tune of 35 billion euros "in order to increase its investment capacity in modernization and renovation of the railway network. This law organized the opening to progressive and differentiated competition, the end of status recruitment[5]and the negotiation of a "new social contract" (sic!).
Since 2020, SNCF has been made up of a holding company and five limited companies: SNCF Réseau, SNCF Gares & Connexions, Rail Logistics Europe and SNCF Voyageurs. The latter manages all of SNCF's passenger transport activities, including Ouigo (see box). SNCF forms, with the companies Keolis and Geodis, the SNCF Group. The State is the sole shareholder of SNCF, whose capital is non-transferable; and since 2010 it has also been the organizing authority for the so-called "territorial balance trains" (TET) that are the Intercités.

Coming back to the Paris-Clermont line, the State has launched a modernization program concerning it, with work on the network financed to the tune of 1 billion euros and with the arrival of new trains, called "Oxygène" , delivery and commissioning of which are planned for 2026. However, there are already reports of major delays in the production of these trains and in the operation of this line...
Finally, as a large part of the investment for the "global regeneration of the network" must be fueled by the profits of SNCF Voyageurs, and as the SNCF must increase its contribution in the next four years, it finds itself confronted with contradictory injunctions. . For 2024 alone, the State is requiring an investment of around 1.7 billion euros, or 70% of its profits in 2022[6]. The SNCF will therefore have to run more trains with fewer resources; maintain Intercity rates; ensure (unlike its competitors) a larger part of the investment in the network while assuming the dysfunctions which are the responsibility of the State. At the same time, it has still not specified how the famous "100 billion euros" plan for rail by 2040 that former Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne announced on February 24, 2023 will be financed. .
On January 14, 2024, LFI MP Clémentine Autain foolishly attributed, on her Twitter account, the delay of a train she was on to the "privatization" of the SNCF. Immediately mocked for her blunder, she corrected the situation by declaring that, of course, the SNCF was not privatized, but that "opening up to competition and liberalization lead[ed]to a deterioration in traffic", and that the SNCF was "forced to prepare for profitability because it was opening up to competition".
It is my opinion that our travels will hardly improve...

Vanina

Notes:

1. "Clermont-Paris train: "We cannot cut Auvergne off from Paris for so long", waiting for concrete measures", FR3 Auvergne, January 24, 2024.
2. "When the French state sabotages the train", by Vincent Doumayrou, Le Monde Diplomatique, June 2016.
3. "SNCF reform: the aftermath of the Spinetta report", Vie publique website, February 26, 2018.
4. "Dismantling of the SNCF: 30 years late, will Macron repeat the same mistakes as the British?», by Olivier Petitjean, on Basta!, February 20, 2018.
5. The special retirement plan was abandoned on January 1, 2021: railway workers hired after this date no longer benefit from it. SNCF management explains that the occasional daily cancellation of trains is due to a lack of drivers, because many of them have retired.
6. Initially, this share was set at 60%.

"Progress is only valuable if it is shared by everyone" is not a marketing lie. Indeed, observing as we do that progress is not shared by all, and therefore that it is worthless, the SNCF has reinvented with its "low cost offer" the 3rd class which had been abolished in France in 1956. 2013, she treated us to her famous Ouigo...
But the Ouigos are different from the 3rd class of yesteryear: these trains almost all have the particularity of arriving at or departing from a station that is difficult to access. For example, we take you to Marne-la-Vallée-Chessy, forty-five minutes from Paris when public transport works well or there are no traffic jams - very improbable scenarios -, this which costs you 5 euros per person. Or you get off at Saint-Exupéry station, and it takes you about an hour and around 10 euros per person to get to Lyon by public transport. There are also some Ouigo Paris-Lyons from Paris to Lyon; but if they are a little below the TGV for their price, their speed is fully Ouigo, it: count 5 hours...
In the 3rd class cars of yesteryear, the transport conditions were very uncomfortable, but at least we left from the same place as "the others" and we took the same time as them to reach our destination.

https://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4099
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center