A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, Sicilia Libertaria: Edited: Europe at war: full speed ahead! (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:39:05 +0200


EU defense ministers met informally on 30 and 31 January in Brussels to discuss the hot topics of the moment: the war in Ukraine and the Red Sea crisis. Dwelling on the summit's concluding statements is quite instructive. The High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of the EU, Josep Borrell, who took part in the meeting, first complained about the delay with which the EU is sending the ammunition promised to Kiev, confirmed the commitment to train another 20 thousand Ukrainian soldiers and then said: "Europe must increase its defense capacity, today to defend Ukraine, tomorrow to defend itself". For his part, the Italian defense minister was pleased with the fact that Europe is finally less bureaucratic and on the ministry's website we read: "I have finally seen a Europe that moves faster than what we are used to.": today, in fact, we discussed the launch of a European operation following the crisis in the Red Sea. For the Aspides operation, Italy confirmed its willingness to participate by providing a ship for the entire duration of the mission. Specifically, there will be more ships taking turns and as it is a new mission there will be a parliamentary passage first." In the days preceding the summit, Minister Crosetto had been interviewed by the newspaper La Stampa, to plead the cause of the new militarism: "We have built - he said in response to a question - rules with the idea of an always peaceful world, of nations that do not invade the others, with wars that do not affect the well-being of our citizens. And instead we find ourselves in a different world, whose actors who are destabilizing it, Iran, Russia and North Korea, have a military production capacity superior to that of NATO." And again: "Yes, we transformed the armed forces with the idea that there was no longer a need to defend our territory and that peace was a de facto irreversible achievement. The armed forces, in this context, at most participate in peacekeeping missions, without leading to actual clashes. Now the fences have been torn down, there are no more rules." Therefore the minister - at this point in the war - concludes that in order to protect its territory and "intervene in distant countries to defend Italian interests", Italy must equip itself militarily, and in this specific case it would be necessary to establish a military reserve. This is basically the same concept expressed several times, after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, in a more elegant manner by Lucio Caracciolo, who believes that there is not a sufficient military culture in Italy.

The wishes of the interior ministers were accepted on 1 February by the European Council which allocated a further 50 billion euros for a financial assistance plan for Ukraine. Zelensky naturally thanked him and everything is seen as another step towards Ukraine's integration into the European Union. It should be noted how a good part of the Italian media presented the matter: a double success, "saving Kiev" and bringing Orban, the Hungarian prime minister who has always been critical of aid to Ukraine, back into the "democratic" orbit, who has now instead had to give his consent. In this way the attention was catalysed, not on the useless continuation of a war which after two years is still stuck at the same point, bringing back into vogue the dirty twentieth century wars fought meter by meter and whose only result is the devastation of entire territories and the count of tens and tens of thousands of deaths, including civilians and soldiers, but on the success of democratic Europe over the retrograde Europe represented by Orban, which corresponds, according to a crude but effective parallel, to the clash between democratic Ukraine and authoritarian Russia.

Meanwhile, the other hot front in international relations, the Iranian one, is splitting. To the situation in the Red Sea, where the Houthi attacks on "Western" merchant ships have met with a prompt response from the USA and Great Britain who bomb positions and shoot down rebel drones (to this initiative should be added, as we have seen, the operation Aspides, also supported by Italy, always dutiful in waging war where the American master calls), overlapped with the attack conducted by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on an American military base in Jordan. Also in this case the United States responded with various air strikes on the bases of these groups, whose instigators reside in Shiite Iran, Iraq and Syria. Biden declares that he does not want to wage war on Iran, but in the meantime the situation is becoming more and more uncertain and the ongoing tragedy in Gaza makes everything more unpredictable.

Of course Gaza and what is happening in Palestine becomes more unsustainable and unspeakable every day, more than 25 thousand deaths so far, many children; defenseless people subjected to extreme living conditions, all in the most total indifference of governments, institutions, organizations that flaunt democracy and solidarity at every summit, but in this situation show compliance rather than impotence. The public debate in Italy is also unbelievable, perhaps it should be better said that it is imbued with a revolting moralizing cynicism. A lot of the press, a lot of television, a lot of politicians, the foreign minister standing out among all, show the good face of understanding for the plight of the Palestinians but in the meantime they support and support the Israeli government, in their opinion another democratic bastion in the dark forest of illiberal Islamism . In the mainstream narrative on the ongoing war in Gaza there is a very specific pattern: the fate of the Israeli hostages, the perfidious action of the Hamas militiamen - the pinnacle of which is represented by the infamous tunnels (the image of evil emerging from underground) or from mixing with the sick in hospitals -, the positions of the various actors in the field and finally the miserable conditions of the inhabitants of the Strip, whose responsibility it would seem to be attributed to an adverse fate if not to a sin to be paid for. To this narrative has been added the sterile controversy on the occasion of Remembrance Day; many have been led to believe that accusing the action of the Israeli government and army of genocide is equivalent to denying the Shoah, or in any case demonstrating anti-Semitic attitudes. In the museum of memory everything crystallizes, guilty and innocent, victims and executioners are projected into a space outside of time, where what happened is fixed forever and forever away from us, a warning and apotropaic ritual to be fulfilled to keep us safe and feel guiltless, indeed custodians of the truth.

I don't think there could be clearer evidence of how state policies now move in a climate of war and militarism. That pacifist sentiment, a legacy of the rejection of the tragedies of the world wars, which perhaps persisted until the war in Iraq in 2003, is now completely erased. But if we do not want to succumb to wars (without forgetting the ongoing climate crisis), it should be a priority to rebuild a strong opposition to war which cannot ignore the rejection of weapons and armies, the rejection of rising nationalism and the revival of a new internationalism, proletarian if we want.

Angelo Barberi

http://sicilialibertaria.it
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center