A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, Sicilia Libertaria: Public health: a planned destruction (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:16:08 +0200


It is now known that the NHS is experiencing a systemic crisis, worsened from government to government, which increasingly resembles a planned metamorphosis. The institution of the NHS dates back to 1978, a period in which capitalism was already being reorganized in a neoliberal sense in the rest of Europe. This testifies to the "peculiarity of the Italian laboratory of the seventies". The NHS was in fact born from the synergy between trade union and workers' struggles, feminist and student demands, and from the shared vision of "health as a social and political fact (social in its genesis and political in its resolution)". Both universalist ambition and democratic demands converged in the NHS, by virtue of which a decentralized model was opted for, close to the real problems of the population, and with a privileged focus on prevention. Thanks to these factors, the Italian NHS remained an international point of reference for many years.

But the current situation appears very different. Today the NHS is fragmented into many small regional health systems, increasingly absorbed by market logic, and shows its inability to guarantee effective equity of care to the population. The reasons for this decline are numerous and complex, and only partly attributable to neoliberal austerity.

If on the one hand the institution of the NHS has overcome the paternalistic model of the Mutua, on the other hand it has strengthened that process of "monopoly of care", whose genealogy Foucault traces back to the 18th century in the West. The healthcare institution has gradually swallowed up the entire scope of care. The very definition of "health" and "disease" has become the prerogative of the dominant classes, no longer an expression of what populations and different cultures develop. From an instrument of political redemption, healthcare has become a system of disciplinary and homogenizing power. As Illich pointed out, the rigidification of healthcare institutions has deprived them of their conviviality, that is, the possibility of sharing knowledge and/or living with other people's knowledge.

On the other hand, with families "nuclearized" and deprived of the material and cultural possibilities to exercise care, the domestic environment has become an increasingly hostile place for the elderly and chronically ill. Hospitalization has increased exponentially, thanks to a distorted vision that sees "life extension" (at all costs) as synonymous with "health protection". In this cult of longevity, which permeates the underlying ideology of US-led techno-science, we glimpse the ancient and crazy dream of immortality. Death ceases to be a natural fact, it is just an accident, and as such it should not be accepted but fought technically. The therapeutic fury produced by this non-relationship with death, in which a certain obscurantist Catholicism still plays its part, translates into the chronicity of many terminally ill patients. The tensions between healthcare workers, frustrated by having to "cure" patients without any prospect of improvement, and a social fabric that can no longer take care of family members, plastically measure all the critical issues underway.

It is on these structural critical issues that austerity - imposed by precise political choices - has launched its deadly attack. In Italy, health spending has been in constant decline since 2011, with a spending review process of the health sector which already in 2012 the Court of Auditors considered "the most advanced and complete experience of what should be a spending review process ". The public has been deliberately impoverished to the advantage of the private sector, with the almost forced recourse to more or less direct outsourcing: let's think about how long waiting lists force people to turn to affiliated centers for instrumental diagnostics (for those who can afford them) or how the shortage of doctors in emergency rooms is addressed by "token operators". But market logic pollutes the public sector from within. We already see this with the DRG system, which assigns a "price" to each pathology on the basis of which the hospital is paid. Hospital companies, like any other company, are induced to grab the most profitable DRG, and to try to maintain, from year to year, equal or greater quantities of that given DRG. Here Healthcare unmasks its new nature, which is not that of guardian of health, but of "incubator" of disease. The disease becomes to all intents and purposes a commodity, and the hospital is the factory responsible for its processing. It goes without saying that reducing the incidence of illnesses through prevention is of less and less interest: both because it is not as profitable and because it would be equivalent to depriving oneself of the goods from which the company derives profits (fewer illnesses = fewer DRGs paid). Lastly, because it would mean recognizing the social nature of most evils, which would force us to question the entire capitalist system. The political and bioethical impasse into which the NHS has fallen seems clear to me.

And yet internal healthcare debates are few and almost exclusively focused on the salary issue. But increasing funding is not enough to overcome this stalemate. What is needed first and foremost is collective awareness of how market logic is incompatible not only with the equity of care, but with the very right to health protection. Second, we must abandon the current elitist-corporate approach of the medical class, and admit that there is no truth, because there is not a single concept of health. To do this we need to "re-democratize" the concepts of health and illness, to frame pathologies no longer as the exclusive problem of the individual, but in their social dimension. Lastly, it is necessary to promote the territorialisation of Care, actively involving mutualisms from below.

Disseminating scientific knowledge and sharing the means to produce it, indeed restoring conviviality to it, is not equivalent to giving rise to gurus or false cures; at least no more than is already happening (think of the murky nutraceutical sector). Spreading knowledge and resocializing Care is the only real remedy to make us less manipulable and regain control of the management of our lives.

Riccardo Ricceri

http://sicilialibertaria.it
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center