|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Francais_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkurkish_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, OCL CA #337 - "Understanding capitalism to get out of it" - Review of the book by Jean-Luc Dupriez (L'Harmattan, April 2023) (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:26:59 +0200
Jean-Luc Dupriez (aka Jacques Dubart) is a libertarian Communist. He was
an activist at UTCL from 1979, then a member of Alternative Libertaire.
He participated in the creation of the UCL which he left after the 1st
Congress because in opposition to the new line which broke with
platformism and the centrality of the class struggle. He is now active
within the Libertarian Communist Platform. ---- This book is intended to
be an activist tool for understanding the current world, contemporary
capitalism, in order to better combat it. The author seeks, from a
materialist point of view, to position "humans relative to the
fundamentals of homo sapiens" in order to understand the sources of
oppression and overcome them. In this, he joins the ambition of B.
Lahire in his work "The Fundamental Structures of Human Societies" which
we will review in a future issue of Courant Alternatif. These two books,
however, have very different objectives. J.L. Dupriez's book is written
in a didactic and accessible way, intended for people who do not master
all the political concepts specific to revolutionary currents. This
makes it a work that can easily be recommended to people who are not
very political... but with some reservations.
The book is made up of six thematic parts. The first part is a good
summary of what capitalism is, its dynamics and its current form. In the
following part the author draws on recent research in ethology,
anthropology and archeology to denounce racism, sexism, etc. The author
explains how racism is largely a social construction resulting from
political choices of the ruling classes . Likewise, on sexism, it
reports in a simple and clear way how the current oppression of women is
inscribed in the social framework of capitalism and shows how the fight
against patriarchy existed at all times and in all places at the time.
modern. The third part on social classes is intended to be educational.
Drawing on sociological work, he characterizes in an illustrated manner
the materiality and violence of class relations in today's world,
convincingly contradicting all the discourses which assert that social
classes and class struggle have disappeared. The penultimate part, on
the ecological crisis, is very interesting because it gives different
arguments to counter two ideas: 1/ everyone would be responsible for
global warming on their individual scale; 2/ capitalism can adapt to
avoid ecological catastrophe... with a relevant political critique of
veganism. It shows that the ecological crisis is well inscribed in the
development of capitalism and that we must therefore combine social
struggles and ecological struggles. A final, very short part discusses
religions from a revolutionary atheist perspective.
However, all these developments involve Science and we may have some
reservations on this subject. In the introduction to this work, the
author has a scientific approach which is intended to be opposed to
scientism (which considers that science holds the truth), it only gives
"a representation of reality... as coherent as possible with the facts
known at a given time. If these precautions are thus taken in the
introduction, it nevertheless emerges a form of adhesion sometimes
without retreat to certain contemporary scientific theories on subjects
where consensus does not exist. The lack of a bibliography at the end of
the book does not facilitate access to the sources cited.
The work thus relies, in the long section on sexism and racism, on
primates (bonobos, chimpanzees) to understand humans; there are
therefore shortcuts that can be criticized (see the counterpoint to the
book by B. Lahire). He also takes up, on the oppression of women, the
thesis that it only appeared with the emergence of social classes
(Neolithic). However, it seems increasingly consensual that man
dominated women even in the Paleolithic, which does not mean that this
fact is genetically or biologically determined[1]. Furthermore, if the
author is right not to separate the biological from the cultural, he
tends to give an overly biological reading of human behavior in the
first chapters (sociability, hostility and violence towards strangers,
etc.) and therefore emerge from contradictions between certain parties.
The author affirms that "culture will modulate this behavior, to the
point of being able to almost annihilate it" but the associated
developments do not allow us to understand how culture could modify what
seems biologically inevitable. Indeed, in the first chapters, the
general impression emerges that biology dominates humans. However,
things are much more complex as shown for example by B. Lahire.
These reservations having been made, ultimately, the work clearly
positions itself in a libertarian communist perspective. It shows that
class, sexist, racist oppressions and the Capitalocene are not
insurmountable. He positions himself against the dominant
postmodernist/intersectional current which leads to a multitude of
separate struggles: class relations are central and they cut across all
other systems of domination. He clearly advocates for universalism in a
political way and therefore criticizes its use by the ruling class. To
overcome capitalism, this requires a political fight... the subject of a
second work to be published which will seek to provide answers to the
question: "how to organize the fight to transform the world". We are
therefore impatiently awaiting this second work because in substance,
very occasionally in this first book, a focus on trade unionism emerges
which could be open to criticism.
VR
Note
[1]See among others "The oppression of women, yesterday and today: to
end it tomorrow!"» accessible on the blog "La hutte des classes" by C.
Darmangeat
http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4083
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) France, UCL AL #346 - Politics, Interview: "Any revolutionary ideal can be judged terrorist" (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Greece, protaanka: Placement at the "organizing anarchists" event (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center