A-Infos (en) UK, ACG, Jackdaw 26 - The British General Strike of 1926: An Anarchist Communist Critique (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

The British General Strike of May 1926 remains one of the defining 
moments in the history of the British labour movement. Although it 
lasted only nine days, it has entered working-class memory alongside 
Peterloo, Tolpuddle, the Great Unrest of 1911-14, the 1984-85 Miners' 
Strike and the Wapping dispute. The strike emerged from the economic 
crisis that followed the First World War. After wartime state control 
and increased demand, Britain's coal industry faced declining exports 
and growing international competition. Mine owners sought to restore 
profits by cutting wages and extending working hours, while miners 
resisted further attacks on already impoverished living standards. Under 
the leadership of the militant A.J. Cook, the Miners' Federation adopted 
the slogan: "Not a penny off the pay, not a minute on the day."
In 1925, the Conservative government temporarily subsidised the coal 
industry after mine owners announced wage cuts, delaying confrontation 
in what became known as "Red Friday." However, the subsidy was only 
temporary. The Samuel Commission later recommended industrial 
reorganisation while accepting wage reductions. At the same time, the 
government quietly prepared for industrial conflict by stockpiling 
supplies and organising emergency measures.
When negotiations collapsed in April 1926, the mine owners locked out 
over a million miners. On 3 May, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) 
reluctantly called a General Strike in support of them. Around 2.5 
million workers from transport, printing, steel and other key industries 
withdrew their labour, making it the largest industrial dispute in 
British history. After only nine days, however, the TUC called off the 
strike without securing guarantees for the miners, who continued alone 
for several months before returning to work on worse terms. The defeat 
weakened organised labour for a generation.
The General Strike was significant because it demonstrated that society 
depends upon the labour of working people. Transport stopped, newspapers 
ceased publication, and large sections of industry ground to a halt. 
Workers showed that they possessed enormous collective power capable of 
disrupting capitalist society. Yet this potential remained unrealised. 
From an anarchist communist perspective, the strike illustrates both 
the strength of working-class solidarity and the limitations imposed by 
reformist trade union leadership and the absence of revolutionary 
organisation.
Anarchist communism argues that social transformation requires workers 
to self-organise independently of the bureaucratic leadership of the 
trade unions and for anarchists to organise themselves around shared 
political principles, direct democracy, federalism and collective 
responsibility and to insert themselves into these self-organised 
movements of the working class.
The greatest weakness of the General Strike lay in the strategy of the 
TUC leadership. They viewed the strike not as a challenge to capitalism 
but as a negotiating tactic designed to pressure the government into 
compromise. Although millions of workers had effectively demonstrated 
their ability to stop the country functioning, union leaders repeatedly 
insisted that the strike was purely industrial and had no political 
objectives. This contradiction fatally limited the movement.
Trade union officials occupy a position distinct from ordinary workers. 
Their role centres on negotiating between labour and capital and 
avoiding revolutionary confrontation. Consequently, they feared the 
independent development of working-class power almost as much as the 
government did. The TUC called the strike reluctantly, tightly 
controlled its development and abruptly ended it without consulting the 
rank and file or securing victory for the miners.
The strike also exposed the importance of workers' self-organisation. 
Across Britain, local Councils of Action coordinated strike activity, 
organised food distribution, transport and communications, and 
demonstrated the capacity of ordinary people to manage society 
collectively. These bodies hinted at an alternative form of social 
organisation based upon direct democracy. However, they remained 
subordinate to the trade union bureaucracy and never developed into 
independent centres of workers' power capable of directing the struggle 
nationally.
The government's response confirmed another central anarchist communist 
argument: the state is not a neutral institution but an instrument for 
defending ruling-class interests. Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin's 
government prepared extensively before the strike, recruiting around 
100,000 volunteer strike-breakers, including Oxbridge university 
students and former military officers, enrolling approximately 200,000 
special constables, deploying troops where necessary and ensuring that 
essential services continued under state control. The state coordinated 
strike-breaking and protected capitalist interests throughout the dispute.
However, repression alone does not explain the defeat. Governments can 
be expected to defend existing social relations. The decisive question 
is whether workers possess the organisation and political confidence 
necessary to challenge them. In 1926, the labour movement had immense 
industrial strength but lacked revolutionary coordination and an 
alternative strategy independent of reformist leadership.
The General Strike also demonstrated that a general strike inevitably 
becomes political. Once millions withdraw their labour simultaneously, 
questions arise over who controls production, transport, communications 
and ultimately society itself. By refusing to acknowledge these 
political realities, the TUC effectively disarmed the movement. Workers 
were mobilised on a scale that challenged the existing order but were 
offered no strategy for extending their power beyond industrial protest. 
 Whilst the capitalist class organised themselves for all out-class war 
the trade unions were desperate not to cause any trouble.
For anarchist communists, the strike also illustrates the limits of 
spontaneity. The courage and solidarity displayed by workers were 
extraordinary, but courage alone does not produce effective strategy. 
Without organised revolutionary forces capable of offering political 
direction and challenging bureaucratic leadership, even the most 
powerful movements risk confusion, compromise and defeat. The absence of 
a strong anarchist communist organisation meant that radical 
possibilities remained largely unrealised. While mass action is 
essential, spontaneous struggle alone cannot overcome the organised 
power of the state and capitalism. Revolutionary organisation is 
necessary to provide political clarity, coordinate struggles and 
encourage workers' self-management.
Despite its failure, the General Strike should not simply be remembered 
as a defeat. It demonstrated remarkable solidarity across industries and 
regions, with millions accepting hardship in defence of fellow workers. 
It also exposed the gulf between the aspirations of ordinary workers and 
the caution of their official leaders. These experiences shaped later 
generations of militants seeking forms of organisation based upon direct 
democracy rather than bureaucratic mediation.
The lessons remain relevant today. The General Strike showed that 
workers possess the collective power to bring capitalist society to a 
standstill. It also demonstrated that industrial action alone cannot 
secure fundamental social change. Successful revolutionary movements 
require democratic organisation rooted in workplaces and communities, 
political clarity and the ability to coordinate struggles independently 
of reformist institutions.
Trade unions remain essential for defending workers' immediate 
interests, but they cannot by themselves become instruments of social 
revolution. Revolutionary transformation depends upon workers exercising 
direct control over their own struggles through democratic organisations 
while building revolutionary political organisations capable of linking 
immediate struggles with the wider goal of a free, classless and 
stateless society.
The British General Strike revealed both the promise and the limitations 
of mass industrial action. Its defeat was not proof that revolutionary 
change is impossible, but that the collective power of the working class 
must be matched by revolutionary organisation, political clarity and 
democratic self-management if future struggles are to succeed.

https://www.anarchistcommunism.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/jackdaw_low-res.pdf
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en