|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, UCADI, #207 - Hungary: The Right Defeats the Right (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 07:35:04 +0300
In the general election, 80% of Hungarian voters chose to replace the
right-wing sovereignist government led by Victor Orban, a white
supremacist, a staunch Zionist, and a close associate of Netanyahu, whom
he praises, with a right-wing government led by Peter Magyar, his former
associate. ---- Brussels, a major electoral sponsor of the right-wing
Tisza party, an electoral coalition formed in 2020, born out of a
controversial "family split" initiated by the husband of Justice
Minister Judit Varga, from whom she later divorced, is rejoicing,
believing it has gained a head of government who will be a major force
in its foreign policy. However, it claims its satisfaction stems from
the new prime minister's intentions to restore the rule of law that
Orban had dismantled, using his ex-wife as Justice Minister for two
terms, establishing what Orban himself proudly called a democratura, or
illiberal democracy.
In truth, Magyar has carefully avoided making such a commitment, even
though the electorate has given his party 138 seats, which the new
government could use to radically revise the Constitution and repeal all
the changes that have transformed the country, eliminating social and
political rights, workers' rights, the freedom and autonomy of social
groups, religious freedom, the independence of the judiciary, and
freedom of education. On a social level, these changes have targeted and
repressed minorities such as the LGBTQ+ community. Taking Tisza's
program as a point of reference, it seems clear instead that the new
government's primary and priority objective will be to restructure the
power centers distributing European Union funding for economic
development, dismantling the network of Orban cronies who monopolized
these funds and enriched themselves by distributing them to friends,
cronies, and clients. The intent appears to be to leverage the fight
against corruption, that is, the crony-family system that imprisoned the
country's productive forces and prevented the Hungarian oligarchy from
dividing up the spoils of the nation.
In fact, Orban lost the election due to the country's severe economic
crisis, which pushed inflation to 25% and significantly reduced the
well-being of Hungarian citizens, deprived of any prospects. This was
also due to the fact that Orban's repeated vetoes in international
politics, especially regarding the financing of the war in Ukraine, had
led the European Union to freeze as much as 17 billion euros. At that
point, it was Prime Minister Orban's entourage that no longer enjoyed
the profits to which they were accustomed and on which they had built
their fortune. The corruption system entered into crisis because there
was no longer any room for corruption. Hence the rebellion of Mayar, one
of his own.
It was therefore necessary to reshape the governing political class, so
that funding could start flowing again, managed by a new coterie of more
or less recycled power supporters. In other words, everything had to
change so that nothing would change. Moreover, after 16 years of
uninterrupted Fidesz rule, the state bureaucratic apparatus what would
be called the deep state is so accustomed to the practical division and
appropriation of public funds and procurement that it is difficult to
imagine the effectiveness of an effective fight against corruption.
It must also be said that Orban did his part to lose the election, so
much so that immediately before the elections, he amended the electoral
law, thus affecting the assignment of majorities in the constituencies,
unaware that this could backfire, and conducted a dull and tired
election campaign, proving that it is not always true that power
corrupts those who don't have it. Choosing Russia as a potential
partner, if it was wise within the international political framework,
with the goal of achieving energy autonomy, did not take into account
the Ukrainians' power to block, as happened with the Druzhva gas and oil
pipelines, thus jeopardizing the country's supplies. To be fair, Orban
did everything he could to make this issue the centerpiece of his
policy, but it wasn't enough, nor did Trump (Orban's so-called friend)
help him in any way. When Zelensky began blocking the Druzhva oil
pipeline, he could have made a phone call to the Ukrainian despot and
ordered him to reopen it. This would have been a gesture that would have
helped Orban in the elections, a practical aid that would have suggested
to voters that Orban's policies were somehow paying off. But nothing
came of it, because in the end, Trump is so self-centered that he only
helps himself (if he ever manages to).
On the other hand, Orban's blatantly pro-Israel stance, underscored by
his speech in support of Netanyahu, had no bearing, much less his
support for the aggression against Iran in a country with controlled
information and completely focused on domestic problems. Proof of this
is the complete failure of the left-wing parties, which barely reached
2% of the vote and whose election campaigns also heavily emphasized
criticism of the government's international stance.
The new government and the unresolved issues
It will take about a month for the new parliament to be installed and
the new government to be formed, but the problems that remain for
Hungary are many and all well-known, and they will inevitably influence
the political choices the new government will be called upon to make.
Even if the country is forced to repay the debt owed to Brussels by
changing its position on the war in Ukraine and removing the vetoes it
has raised so far (which, after all, Orban was always ready to drop in
exchange for concessions), the release of the frozen EUR17 billion could
provide some relief to the country's asphyxiated economy and will help
repay the new, hungry cliques that will share power. However, it will
not resolve the country's structural economic problems, which have their
roots in the general structure of the European Union's economic and
social policy. It will not resolve the energy crisis, whose necessary
reference point is always Russian supplies. It will not resolve the
problems related to the Hungarian diaspora. It will create a major
international uncertainty regarding the country's place within the
Union, with the definitive crisis of the Visagrad group. It will not
resolve the problem of restoring violated civil liberties, which is the
last, but truly the last, concern of the new government.
It will then have to address the issue of how to proceed or terminate
established relations with China, which primarily concern strategic
infrastructure and the electric vehicle (EV) industry, including battery
factories (Eve Energy, BYD). These already-established relations have
positioned the country as a key logistics and production hub for Beijing
in Europe, also thanks to the ongoing construction of the
Budapest-Belgrade high-speed railway, built by Chinese workers and with
Chinese capital, which should connect the two countries to the
Beijing-controlled ports of Piraeus. To understand the importance of the
issue, it is enough to remember that this was one of the causes of the
Serbian crisis, which led the United States and Europe to undertake
joint destabilization actions against the Serbian government in order to
prevent the project's completion.
The only result of what happened will be the speeding up of
decision-making processes in Brussels, which will inevitably be pushed
towards the abyss due to support for the war in Ukraine, which will
increasingly erode the levels of welfare that European Union countries
are able to provide to their citizens and lead to the impoverishment of
the weakest classes and social classes. It is the awareness of this
mechanism that has led Russian politicians to rejoice at what has
happened, arguing that the effects of the change of power are
accelerating the crisis of the European Union, which they, like the
United States, detest. A side effect of the Hungarian elections is the
failure of Vance, a propagandist for Orban, in which he implicated Trump
with a live phone call. The failure and the damage to Orban's image
demonstrate that Trump and his vice president have now become an
effective weapon in the hands of their adversaries.
A Sovereignist-Opportunist Program
Seeking to underscore the difference from Orban's previous tenure, which
restricted journalists to a select group, Mayar, on Monday, April 13,
held a three-hour conference on his government's political program. He
declared that he would oppose any fast-track approach to Ukraine's
accession to the European Union, arguing that accession "would be
impossible for a country at war. All candidate states must follow the
same process." Moreover, during a public consultation organized to gauge
the mood of his voters (April 13, 2025, a year ago), over 90% of Tisza's
supporters supported Magyar's proposals on the fight against corruption
and a more European and Western position for Hungary, but only 58.2%
said they favored Ukraine's accession to the EU. In response, Magyar
promised that once in government it would hold a referendum on the
issue, but only when and if accession is concretely on the table and the
conditions are defined in detail. This is because Magyar knows well,
like all Hungarians, that as a result of the Treaty of Trianon, which in
1920 redrew Hungary's borders after the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian
Empire, depriving the country of approximately two-thirds of its
territory and leaving millions of Hungarians outside the country, a
significant portion of the population remained beyond the border,
including the Transcarpathian community, now in Ukraine, which is
persecuted by the Kiev government, which forcibly recruits men to fight,
bans the teaching of Hungarian in schools, and does everything to
assimilate the population, arresting anyone caught speaking Hungarian in
public. In recent years, Orbán has done everything to support the Magyar
minorities abroad, and Magyar wants to follow suit. However, in a spirit
of compromise with Brussels, the new government will not oppose the
EUR90 billion loan to Kiev that Orbán was blocking, but will maintain
its decision not to participate financially in the loan, as well as
opposing Ukraine's rapid accession to the Union.
Regarding Russia, however, he said he wants to maintain "pragmatic"
relations with Moscow, especially regarding gas imports, noting that
Budapest cannot "change the geography. Russia will be there and Hungary
will be here," so his country will not be able to easily cut itself off
from Russian supplies, as it wants to continue "buying cheap oil
safely," even as it will work to diversify its sources, whatever that
means in a country that, as is well known, is landlocked. For the same
reason, sanctions should be lifted because "it is not in Europe's
interest to buy raw materials at higher prices because this destroys our
competitiveness.
I understand the moral issues, but we must not shoot ourselves in the
foot." Not an alliance, then, but not a split either.
On immigration, Magyar, in line with Orbán, supports the country's total
closure. In other words, a right-wing government, but not too
right-wing, pragmatic and opportunistic. The European left has nothing
to celebrate!
G. C.
https://www.ucadi.org/2026/04/19/ungheria-la-destra-sconfigge-la-destra/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) France, OCL CA #360 - Alternative Current Nr. 360, Mai 2026 (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #14-26 - No cages or borders. No CPR! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center