|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, UCADI, #207 - SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT UKRAINE (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 07:46:46 +0300
Oil and gas supplies, made even more problematic by the war with Iran
and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, are prompting reflection on
the advisability of resuming Russian oil and gas supplies, which were
masochistically interrupted due to support for Ukraine, which would be
morally motivated by Russian aggression, even at the cost of sanctions
that are more damaging to the West than to Russia. Certainly
contributing to this shift is the fact that our beloved ally, the United
States, along with the equally criminal state of Israel, has attacked
the Iranian state, since, it is argued, their action is justified by the
liberticidal nature of the Iranian regime.
But beyond these considerations, it is necessary to try to answer the
question: in a Ukrainian state governed by a liberal regime that
represents Western values, to what extent is the Ukrainian legal system
compatible with the rule of law and the principles that inspire the
European Union, which is draining its members to defend it? If the
answer is affirmative, thus justifying its support, it follows that the
need for preventive defense against alleged Russian aggression remains
to be demonstrated, given that a country like Russia, with a population
of approximately 146 million, has a territory 1.5 to 1.6 km² larger than
Europe and vastly greater natural resources. Therefore, what would it do
with Europe, lacking even the forces to control it?
Given this, let us note that before the war began, Ukraine had a
population of around 42 million. The outbreak of the civil war in 2014,
which began with a coup d'état following the Maidan clashes an event
notoriously funded by the United States, according to its own admission
was followed by government repression of the population of some eastern
oblasts (Donbass) who were demanding autonomy, carried out by
nationalist militias of "volunteers" with avowedly neo-Nazi and
nationalist leanings.
As is well known, following the failure of the two Minsk agreements that
would have granted autonomy to Donbass and the failure to implement the
federalization of the state as a precondition for ending the conflict,
the Russian army invaded the country on February 24, 2022, continuing a
war that is still being fought and has reduced the Ukrainian population
to less than 20 million. The count naturally includes battlefield
casualties, those killed in bombings, and, above all, the exodus of
populations who fled to the West. Eight million found refuge in the
West, while approximately 10 million chose Russia. This demonstrates
that the country was, and still is, a civil war between a portion of the
Russian-speaking population and those of other ethnic groups,
nationalists and pro-Westerners, and that the populations of eastern
Ukraine, in particular, experienced their relationship with the
Ukrainian central government as one of ethnic oppression.
Violated Rule of Law Principles
Russian-speaking residents of Ukraine denounce the violation of the
rights of linguistic minorities, guaranteed through the application of
the principle of non-discrimination contained in Article 21 of the EU
Charter of Fundamental Rights and the principle of the valorization of
cultural diversity (Article 3 TEU). Although there is no single body of
binding EU laws on minorities, protection is based on international
standards and policies to safeguard multilingualism. Protection occurs
through the safeguarding of the individual rights of persons belonging
to minorities, based on the principle of non-discrimination based on
ethnic origin or language. It must be said that this is a fundamental
right, so much so that it is a requirement that countries wishing to
join the European Union must possess, a principle that should also apply
to Ukraine, which has been so insistently seeking membership.
This protection is strengthened by the 1992 European Charter for
Regional or Minority Languages, which, although issued by the Council of
Europe and not directly by the EU, commits signatory states to protect
and promote the use of minority languages in education, justice, and
public services.
Ukraine, on the other hand, bans the teaching of minority languages from
schools, prohibits their use in public offices, burns books, blacklists
authors, especially Russian ones, and even arrests those who speak them
in public. See about it ?????????, 2019,[law on the functioning of the
Ukrainian language as a state language], (????????? ????????? ????
(???), 2019, No 21, ??.81) exacerbated ???? No 1, ?/2021 ??? 14.07.2021.
Although religious freedom rights and separatism between the state and
religious denominations do not follow a single model, they are
characterized by a plurality of national models within a common European
legal framework that guarantees neutrality, non-discrimination, and
dialogue.
Religious freedom is enshrined as a fundamental right in the Charter of
Fundamental Rights of the EU (Article 10), which guarantees freedom of
thought, conscience, and religion, including the right to change one's
religion or belief and to manifest one's faith both in public and
private. In particular, Article 17 TFEU, introduced by the Treaty of
Lisbon, establishes that the Union "respects and does not prejudice the
status under national law of churches and religious associations in the
Member States."
"The EU is committed to maintaining an open, transparent, and stable
dialogue with churches, religious communities, and non-confessional
philosophical organizations. Furthermore, European law prohibits
discrimination based on religion, especially in employment, ensuring
reasonable accommodation for religious needs."
These principles are violated by the Ukrainian law: "For the protection
of the constitutional system in the framework of the activities of
religious organizations" ?????????? ?????????? ???????????, (?????????
????????? ???? (???), 2024, No 49, 290)]. This decision not only amended
the 1991 law on religious freedom, but also "infected" the Lithuanian,
Estonian, and Latvian legal systems, spurring the enactment of similar
laws. Ministers of religious denominations other than the state church
are persecuted by the regime's police, churches are taken from the
religious denominations that run them and assigned to the state church,
believers are expelled from their churches and deprived of any place of
worship, and churches, clergy, and believers who do not belong to the
state church are persecuted, beaten, and imprisoned.
Corruption reigns supreme in state supplies and contracts, and even in
military supplies, while investigations into thefts perpetrated by the
Ukrainian ruling class are exploited by the media and peddled to claim
the existence of democratic control, which would be demonstrated by the
discovery of incidents of corruption and theft involving the highest
levels of government and public administration.
Numerous regulations are incompatible with European health protection
legislation, due to the use of pesticides and GMOs; the soil is highly
polluted, partly due to the war, and yet Ukrainian agricultural products
are sold and marketed in the European Union, to the detriment of
European citizens' health and at prices competitive with those of EU
farmers, due to the low cost of labor, the trade concessions granted,
and the nonexistent value of the national currency. This is because
European Union funding entirely covers the country's nonexistent budget.
Faced with the looming economic crisis, the time has come for European
Union member states to ask themselves, in the name of their people's
interests, whether it's time to stop harming themselves by continuing to
support Ukraine and its war, the gang of criminals who wield power,
given that the country is slowly but surely losing the war on the
battlefield, while the media has fallen silent on what's happening,
interrupted only by some who fantasize about Ukrainian successes on the
battlefield.
The Editorial Staff
https://www.ucadi.org/2026/04/19/qualche-domanda-sullucraina/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) France, OCL CA #359 - Rückkehr aus dem Westjordanland/Interview (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, Sicilia, FAS: WHOSE SAFETY? (Press Release) (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center