|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, UCL AL #369 - Ecology - Agriculture: Reversing the Blame, Putting Agribusiness on Trial (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:12:51 +0300
With capitalism, the predatory model of agribusiness has been dominant
in Brittany since the mid-20th century, to the detriment of agricultural
cooperatives and farming itself. While voices are being raised in
Lorient, repression, as always, is being unleashed on those who denounce
the exploitative conditions of the land and the workers. On December 15,
2025, in Lorient, the trial of 12 people arrested in March 2022
following an act of civil disobedience targeting agribusiness, claimed
by the Brittany Against Factory Farms collective, took place. The
debates during the hearing and the mobilizations have brought the role
of this inequitable system back into sharp focus.
In the 19th century, during the rapid expansion of industrial
capitalism, regional specialization of agricultural production was
implemented to supply the proletariat that was congregating in and
around large cities, particularly Paris. Agricultural areas closest to
the capital experienced rapid development, such as Normandy and the
Beauce region. More distant regions, like Brittany, had more limited
access to national markets. The mixed crop-livestock farming model
prevalent at the time, which was environmentally friendly, was generally
maintained in Brittany until the 1950s to 1970s, depending on the area,
while rural exodus was at its peak. The use of chemical fertilizers,
which appeared in the 1920s, was limited due to its cost.
France is the third largest pork producer in Europe, with approximately
9,500 farms raising more than 300 pigs (99% of French production). The
Brittany region accounts for 57% of the country's pork production.
France is the third largest pork producer in Europe, with approximately
9,500 farms raising more than 300 pigs (99% of French production). The
Brittany region accounts for 57% of the country's pork production.
Credits: Vannes Museum of Fine Arts
After the Second World War, the Marshall Plan released funds to develop
mechanization and the use of chemical inputs in order to increase
agricultural productivity. In Brittany, a land of hedgerows and rolling
hills, the introduction of these innovations was particularly hampered
by the size of the fields and farms. This period also saw land
consolidation, the merging of land accompanied by the destruction of
hedgerows and embankments. It was later and more abrupt than elsewhere,
and, like mechanization, contributed to the disappearance of smaller,
less competitive farms and to the overall expansion of farms. This
movement was accompanied by recruitment in factories on the outskirts of
cities, such as Rennes, and the resale of land subdivided for
consolidation in exchange for a promise of job and income security from
employers.
From agricultural cooperatives to integrated farming: Farmers were
active participants in these changes, either through their resistance to
the advent of this new model (resistance sometimes tinged with
reactionary ideas), or by organizing themselves into cooperatives to
jointly purchase equipment and inputs, and to collect and sell their
produce. Cooperatives were created and developed in conjunction with
agricultural unions and, in the case of the largest, have become
multinational agribusinesses. In Brittany, this led to the development
of intensive pig and poultry farming. This marked the beginning of
integrated agriculture, where all inputs are supplied by the
cooperative, which obtains the necessary loans from banks and also
purchases the produce. Farmers who adopt this model consequently
experience a significant loss of autonomy, both in terms of production
choices and methods, and in setting prices. Driven by the substantial
investments required to remain competitive in an increasingly globalized
market, cooperatives are becoming increasingly financialized and
merging, losing all democratic character to leaders with one foot in
agriculture and the other in the agribusiness industry. From this
process emerged the Breton agribusiness giants Eureden and Cooperl.
To maintain competitiveness on international markets, in the face of
heavily subsidized agriculture in the United States, aid programs were
established at the European level through the Common Agricultural Policy
(CAP) starting in 1962. Initially guaranteeing minimum prices for
agricultural products, the CAP has since 1992 evolved towards subsidies
paid according to the number of hectares, thus favoring the largest
farms. This situation persists and is intensifying, promoting
ever-larger farms and consolidating power through land grabbing by a
few. Brittany is currently the region of France with the highest number
of factory farms, according to a 2023 study[1].
A destructive model preserved by capitalism
The harmful consequences of the agro-industrial development model are
clearly visible and now documented worldwide. Brittany is no exception:
green tides and the suffocation of waterways linked to nitrates from
concentrated livestock farming, particularly pig farming; the impact of
pesticide pollution on biodiversity and human health; soil erosion due
to the enlargement of fields and mechanization; the emergence of
zoonoses (diseases transmitted between animals and humans); the
concentration of wealth in the hands of a minority driven by
productivism and increased dependence on the financial sector... While
this issue is beginning to gain visibility locally, particularly
following the green algae scandal, collective reactions remain weakened
by the opacity and entrenchment of this system, as well as by the
powerful lobbying of agribusiness with the government.
Paradoxically, the first warnings, which emerged as early as the 1970s,
were often raised by groups historically not very involved in radical
ecological practices. One example is the creation of the association Eau
et rivières de Bretagne (Water and Rivers of Brittany), which began as a
fishing association observing the disappearance of salmon in certain
waterways. It gradually transformed into a citizens' association
attempting to lobby for the preservation of water resources in the
region and participates more broadly in environmental mobilizations.
Another important environmental association is Bretagne vivante (Living
Brittany), successor to the Société pour l'étude et la protection de la
nature en Bretagne (Society for the Study and Protection of Nature in
Brittany), founded in 1959. More recently, in 2020, the Morbihan
collective against factory farms was created, unique in that it also
includes local farmers and residents mobilized against intensive
livestock farming projects.
Resist to denounce!
This group claimed responsibility for the March 2022 action, during
which around fifty activists blocked a grain convoy bound for an animal
feed factory run by the Le Gouessant cooperative, believing they were
targeting the Sanders group. Once the convoy was blocked, the grain was
dumped onto the tracks, a wall was built across the rails, and a banner
was hung with the message, "Agribusiness is leading us straight into a
wall." This act of civil disobedience, symbolic in nature, triggered a
strong and immediate crackdown. Searches, bans on demonstrations, and
placement under judicial supervision were all part of the response.
While the Le Gouessant cooperative and the SNCF, which manages the
railway line, unsurprisingly joined the case as civil parties, the
National Federation of Farmers' Unions (FNSEA), a reactionary,
co-managing agricultural union, also participated in the trial. Indeed,
their support for agribusiness has existed for over 70 years, its
members being directly responsible for the numerous cooperatives that
have become profitable multinationals serving intensive agriculture.
FNSEA executives, under the guise of supporting farmers' work, are
orchestrating their impoverishment and their dependence on the
subsidiaries they manage, all in the pursuit of ever-increasing profits.
It is also interesting to note that the regional branch of this union
described the event as a "scandalous action" and "against the public
interest," while the FNSEA regularly organizes actions that cause far
more material damage, as was pointed out during the trial. Their vision
of a justice system with double standards clearly illustrates their
desire to silence any act of resistance against an agricultural system
they manage and which benefits only them.
Although the harmful effects of agribusiness are widely known and
acknowledged, it is environmental activists who are being targeted by
the justice system.
Although the harmful effects of agribusiness are widely known and
acknowledged, it is environmental activists who are being targeted by
the justice system.
Credits: UCL Lorient
The trial held in Lorient therefore carries significant symbolic
importance, having placed at the heart of the debates throughout the
closing arguments not the individual responsibility of the accused, but
rather that of agribusiness. Of the twelve defendants, seven received
convictions and were fined nearly EUR200,000 in collective penalties,
while five were acquitted. Faced with the ecological emergency, let us
give them the necessary support to denounce this predatory system of
resource exploitation that only benefits capitalists! Brittany Against
Factory Farms is organizing a fundraiser to finance legal fees: find out
more on their website![2]
Florence and Eric (UCL Lorient)
Submit
[1]See the 2023 Greenpeace study based on figures from the Ministry of
Ecological Transition.
[2]https://bretagne-contre-les-fermes-usines.fr/collecte-de-fonds-pour-gagner-en-justice-face-a-letat-et-ses-complices/
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Agriculture-Inverser-la-culpabilite-faire-le-proces-de-l-agro-industrie
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) Spaine, Regeneracion: Frustration dekonstruieren - Aktivismus erfordert persönliche und kollektive Entwicklung. Dieser Prozess ist nie abgeschlossen. Von EMBAT (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(it) UK, AFed, Organaise - Il futuro della libertà politica in America è in gioco nel Nord del Texas. (ca, de, en, pt, tr)[traduzione automatica]
A-Infos Information Center