|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: Polar Blast - Prefigurative Freedom: Building the New World in the Shell of the Old (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:55:42 +0300
One of the most distinctive and enduring contributions of anarchist
political theory is the concept of prefiguration, or the insistence that
the means and ends of revolutionary activity must be consistent with
each other. A movement that aims to create a free society must itself be
organised on free principles. A politics that aspires to mutual aid and
voluntary association must practise mutual aid and voluntary association
in its own structures. You cannot build freedom through domination.
This stands in stark contrast to the Leninist conception of
revolutionary organisation, which insisted that the exigencies of
revolutionary struggle required centralised, hierarchical, disciplined
organisation under the authority of a vanguard party. The party would
lead the class, the class would seize the state, the state would direct
the construction of socialism, and, eventually, when the conditions were
right, the state would wither away and communism would emerge.
Anarchists have consistently argued that this is a fantasy, that
hierarchical organisations do not wither away, that centralised power
does not dissolve of its own accord, and that the habits of command and
obedience developed in the period of revolutionary organisation become
the habits of the revolutionary state, and then the postrevolutionary
state, indefinitely.
The prefigurative principle is also a claim about the relationship
between freedom and practice. Freedom is not only a destination to be
achieved at the end of the revolutionary process, it is something that
must be lived and practised now, in the present, in every organisation
and relationship we build. The free association, the workers' council,
the affinity group, the popular assembly, these are not just means to a
free society, they are already, in however partial and embryonic a form,
the practice of freedom. They develop in participants the capacities,
habits, and values that a free society requires of self-governance,
collective deliberation, mutual accountability, and trust.
This has practical implications for how anarcho-communists think about
organising. It means a persistent suspicion of bureaucracy, of
leadership cults, of the tendency for revolutionary organisations to
reproduce internally the hierarchical structures they oppose externally.
It means a commitment to rotating responsibilities, to developing the
skills and confidence of all members rather than concentrating expertise
in a few, to making decisions through processes that everyone can
participate in. It means taking seriously the ways in which gender,
race, and other axes of oppression can reproduce themselves within
organisations that officially reject them, attending to who speaks, who
is heard, who gets to set the agenda, whose concerns are treated as
urgent and whose are deferred.
Prefigurative politics is not always comfortable. It requires constant
attention to the gap between declared values and actual practices. It
requires a willingness to be criticised by comrades and to take that
criticism seriously. It can be slow, because genuine collective
deliberation takes longer than a central committee issuing directives.
But this slowness is, in a sense, the point. Learning to govern
ourselves freely and collectively is not something that can be rushed or
skipped. It is the substance of the revolution, not a detour on the way
to it.
https://thepolarblast.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/to-be-free-together.pd
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #11-26 - Initiatives against war trains between March 23 and 29 (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: Polar Blast - Freedom Against Empire: The Internationalism of Anarcho-Communist Freedom (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center