|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, UCADI #197 - Research, Trump effect (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Wed, 2 Jul 2025 07:29:31 +0300
Before considering what is happening in the American academic
environment, it is useful to briefly recall the state of the
organization of public research at a global level, for a correct
positioning of the phenomenon. ---- This world has changed a lot
compared to thirty years ago: basic research is funded less and less:
there is an obligation to obtain visible results in the shortest
possible time. In this short-sighted utilitarian race, Europe is one
step ahead of the USA, where (before the advent of Trump 2.0) it was
relatively easy to obtain small and medium funding, thanks to federal
agencies such as the NSF or the NIH. In the EU, however, with few
exceptions, it is often necessary to go through the preparation of
mega-projects that must promise the Moon, which require a long time to
be assembled and which are rarely approved both due to the limited funds
available and the non-transparent management of the evaluation methods.
With the advent of Trump, this scenario is changing, not so much because
of a change of heart in the EU, but "thanks" to both the cuts made in
the USA (essentially ideological and political cuts) and the change in
climate in the academic environment.
On the one hand, we are witnessing significant reductions in funding for
studies on climate science, immunology, social sciences (particularly
migration), infectious diseases, gender studies. An operation vaguely
similar to the ideological one that was made in the Soviet Union,
forcing biology research to align itself with Lysenko's ravings that
caused the USSR to set back many years in that sector. In the current
context, the unfortunate decision does not consist so much in the
imposition of a wrong line of research, but in the ban on working in
relevant sectors, even if it remains to be seen how much they really
want to persist with all the cuts currently planned; for example, I
don't think the US wants to cut itself off from the infectious disease
sector, an area in which they do classified research, presumably linked
to the preparation of biological warfare such as the work done at the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (directed until
2022 by Anthony Fauci, who has something interesting to tell us about
COVID - Jeffrey Sachs, who chaired a parliamentary commission tasked
with shedding light on the origins of the virus, was unable to obtain
information on the matter). A second type of cuts, decidedly more
disturbing, is political, disguised as a fight against anti-Semitism.
Federal funding for some universities, including the famous Ivy League
ones, has been reduced (the most striking case being Columbia University
- CUNY - which suffered a cut of 400 million), claiming that these
institutions sponsor anti-Semitic movements. Not surprisingly, CUNY
responded immediately, announcing measures to align itself with Herr
Trump's "desiderata," proposing, for example, changes to some curricula
(cutting hot topics). Much more worrying is that at CUNY itself,
Professor Catherine Franklin was fired, after 25 years of teaching, for
openly criticizing Israel's policies and in particular the methods used
by the IDF in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians (wasn't the USA, the
nation of "free speech"?).
But the examples of self-censorship (and what self-censorship) don't
stop there. Another striking example comes from Yale (another Ivy League
university, the second oldest after Harvard).
Background: Ben Gvir, Israel's national security minister and at the
same time convicted in his homeland for inciting hatred and a supporter
of a movement defined as terrorist even in Israel, was recently invited
to the US to hold a series of conferences, from Mar-a-lago to a seminar
at Yale at a private association. To refresh your memory on the
character: Ben Gvir, recently released a statement in which he called on
the Israeli army to bomb food and humanitarian aid warehouses in Gaza.
Result of the visit: about 200 Yale students protest the racist's visit,
and in response, the Yale administration decides to ban the
Yaleis4Palestine movement for inciting anti-Semitic hatred.
Established facts: (i) there is no evidence that Yaleis4Palestine
participated in the spontaneous demonstration; (ii) there is a video
where students are seen, in a circle, simply shouting (without touching)
at a certain Netaniel Crispe, who demands to pass through the middle to
shorten his path; (iii) in another video, Orthodox Jews can be
recognized in the group of those protesting; (iv) Netaniel Crispe
appears to be a regular or almost regular guest on talk shows broadcast
by Fox News.
Are these nothing more than dress rehearsals for Nazi-fascism? If you
are still not convinced, let us remember that recently there have been
cases of Green Card holders (a document that allows a foreign worker to
permanently and legally reside in the USA) who have been expelled from
the country, without it being known which police department or similar
carried out the expulsion. It should therefore not be surprising that
many university students and post-docs of various nationalities
(including Slovenians, Belgians, Portuguese, French, Austrians,
Mexicans, Chinese and Irish) often give up visiting their families for
fear of not being able to re-enter the USA upon their return. The
phenomenon also concerns established professors, spouses of Americans,
but without an American passport, who do not feel safe in temporarily
leaving the USA. The feeling of stress extends to Americans as well: 548
out of 690 PhD students interviewed by the journal Nature said they are
considering leaving the US after completing their PhD. Although this
number should not be taken as an accurate estimate of the discomfort, it
does indicate the strong malaise present in the university student
population. The desire to escape extends to academics. In fact, we are
witnessing the development of programs by various European research
institutions for the hiring of US personnel. Among others, the
University of Marseille, the VUB in Brussels; the set of universities in
Berlin; Spain as a nation and Catalonia with a specific program; the
Pasteur Institute in Paris and the entire Max-Planck Society in Germany.
But the phenomenon does not only concern Europe: Australia is preparing
special programs, not to mention Canada which remains the most
attractive destination for obvious reasons. It is not clear whether and
to what extent these initiatives will be successful, given the scarce
resources that are actually available in the Western world for research
and the mad desire of governments to spend only on weapons; there
remains evidence of a change that could be epochal.
To complete the picture of the dark times we are living in, let's add
the cuts imposed by the new DOGE department that affect (among others) a
little-known federal agency that supports public libraries. Without
warning, a dozen fundings were canceled and as a consequence, three
states, California, Connecticut and Washington, found themselves without
funds for their state libraries.
It is difficult to find a rational explanation for all that is
happening, even from the point of view of the interests of the American
empire. The bulk of American students in scientific subjects are
oriented towards finance, much more lucrative than jobs in manufacturing
industries or, worse, in research centers.
The phantom reindustrialization desired by Trump is not only unlikely
due to the higher wages of US workers compared to Chinese, not only due
to the lack of efficient infrastructure, but also due to the lack of
qualified personnel.
Antonio Politi
https://www.ucadi.org/2025/05/25/ricerca-effetto-trump/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #16-25 - The referendum trap. Change is achieved through struggle, not by voting (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Spaine, Regeneracion: What can the libertarian movement learn from statist institutions? (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center