A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, UCADI #197 - Research, Trump effect (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Wed, 2 Jul 2025 07:29:31 +0300


Before considering what is happening in the American academic environment, it is useful to briefly recall the state of the organization of public research at a global level, for a correct positioning of the phenomenon. ---- This world has changed a lot compared to thirty years ago: basic research is funded less and less: there is an obligation to obtain visible results in the shortest possible time. In this short-sighted utilitarian race, Europe is one step ahead of the USA, where (before the advent of Trump 2.0) it was relatively easy to obtain small and medium funding, thanks to federal agencies such as the NSF or the NIH. In the EU, however, with few exceptions, it is often necessary to go through the preparation of mega-projects that must promise the Moon, which require a long time to be assembled and which are rarely approved both due to the limited funds available and the non-transparent management of the evaluation methods.
With the advent of Trump, this scenario is changing, not so much because of a change of heart in the EU, but "thanks" to both the cuts made in the USA (essentially ideological and political cuts) and the change in climate in the academic environment.
On the one hand, we are witnessing significant reductions in funding for studies on climate science, immunology, social sciences (particularly migration), infectious diseases, gender studies. An operation vaguely similar to the ideological one that was made in the Soviet Union, forcing biology research to align itself with Lysenko's ravings that caused the USSR to set back many years in that sector. In the current context, the unfortunate decision does not consist so much in the imposition of a wrong line of research, but in the ban on working in relevant sectors, even if it remains to be seen how much they really want to persist with all the cuts currently planned; for example, I don't think the US wants to cut itself off from the infectious disease sector, an area in which they do classified research, presumably linked to the preparation of biological warfare such as the work done at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (directed until 2022 by Anthony Fauci, who has something interesting to tell us about COVID - Jeffrey Sachs, who chaired a parliamentary commission tasked with shedding light on the origins of the virus, was unable to obtain information on the matter). A second type of cuts, decidedly more disturbing, is political, disguised as a fight against anti-Semitism. Federal funding for some universities, including the famous Ivy League ones, has been reduced (the most striking case being Columbia University - CUNY - which suffered a cut of 400 million), claiming that these institutions sponsor anti-Semitic movements. Not surprisingly, CUNY responded immediately, announcing measures to align itself with Herr Trump's "desiderata," proposing, for example, changes to some curricula (cutting hot topics). Much more worrying is that at CUNY itself, Professor Catherine Franklin was fired, after 25 years of teaching, for openly criticizing Israel's policies and in particular the methods used by the IDF in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians (wasn't the USA, the nation of "free speech"?).
But the examples of self-censorship (and what self-censorship) don't stop there. Another striking example comes from Yale (another Ivy League university, the second oldest after Harvard).
Background: Ben Gvir, Israel's national security minister and at the same time convicted in his homeland for inciting hatred and a supporter of a movement defined as terrorist even in Israel, was recently invited to the US to hold a series of conferences, from Mar-a-lago to a seminar at Yale at a private association. To refresh your memory on the character: Ben Gvir, recently released a statement in which he called on the Israeli army to bomb food and humanitarian aid warehouses in Gaza.
Result of the visit: about 200 Yale students protest the racist's visit, and in response, the Yale administration decides to ban the Yaleis4Palestine movement for inciting anti-Semitic hatred.
Established facts: (i) there is no evidence that Yaleis4Palestine participated in the spontaneous demonstration; (ii) there is a video where students are seen, in a circle, simply shouting (without touching) at a certain Netaniel Crispe, who demands to pass through the middle to shorten his path; (iii) in another video, Orthodox Jews can be recognized in the group of those protesting; (iv) Netaniel Crispe appears to be a regular or almost regular guest on talk shows broadcast by Fox News.
Are these nothing more than dress rehearsals for Nazi-fascism? If you are still not convinced, let us remember that recently there have been cases of Green Card holders (a document that allows a foreign worker to permanently and legally reside in the USA) who have been expelled from the country, without it being known which police department or similar carried out the expulsion. It should therefore not be surprising that many university students and post-docs of various nationalities (including Slovenians, Belgians, Portuguese, French, Austrians, Mexicans, Chinese and Irish) often give up visiting their families for fear of not being able to re-enter the USA upon their return. The phenomenon also concerns established professors, spouses of Americans, but without an American passport, who do not feel safe in temporarily leaving the USA. The feeling of stress extends to Americans as well: 548 out of 690 PhD students interviewed by the journal Nature said they are considering leaving the US after completing their PhD. Although this number should not be taken as an accurate estimate of the discomfort, it does indicate the strong malaise present in the university student population. The desire to escape extends to academics. In fact, we are witnessing the development of programs by various European research institutions for the hiring of US personnel. Among others, the University of Marseille, the VUB in Brussels; the set of universities in Berlin; Spain as a nation and Catalonia with a specific program; the Pasteur Institute in Paris and the entire Max-Planck Society in Germany. But the phenomenon does not only concern Europe: Australia is preparing special programs, not to mention Canada which remains the most attractive destination for obvious reasons. It is not clear whether and to what extent these initiatives will be successful, given the scarce resources that are actually available in the Western world for research and the mad desire of governments to spend only on weapons; there remains evidence of a change that could be epochal.
To complete the picture of the dark times we are living in, let's add the cuts imposed by the new DOGE department that affect (among others) a little-known federal agency that supports public libraries. Without warning, a dozen fundings were canceled and as a consequence, three states, California, Connecticut and Washington, found themselves without funds for their state libraries.
It is difficult to find a rational explanation for all that is happening, even from the point of view of the interests of the American empire. The bulk of American students in scientific subjects are oriented towards finance, much more lucrative than jobs in manufacturing industries or, worse, in research centers.
The phantom reindustrialization desired by Trump is not only unlikely due to the higher wages of US workers compared to Chinese, not only due to the lack of efficient infrastructure, but also due to the lack of qualified personnel.

Antonio Politi

https://www.ucadi.org/2025/05/25/ricerca-effetto-trump/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center