A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FdCA, IL CANTIERE #37 - War and Revolution in Spain 1936/39: Religious Tradition and the Economic and Political Influence of the Catholic Church in Iberian History Since Its Formation. Daniele Ratti (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sat, 8 Nov 2025 08:52:48 +0200


The purpose of this article is to provide a unique account of the Spanish Revolution, unlike traditional historiographical accounts, in order to highlight the cultural and historical elements that profoundly influenced the July Revolution of 1936 and the nationalist counterrevolution. To this end, it is necessary to highlight the historical origins and subsequent, unique path of a nation, Spain, which, formed in the late 1400s through a crusade-a unique case in Europe-has found its inspiration over the centuries in the most strenuous defense of Catholic tradition, becoming the most extreme and radical symbol of religious conservatism, or rather, anti-modernism. Spain entered the new era completely unprepared, lacking adequate cultural tools or economic and social structures, but above all with a population divided by unbridgeable economic differences. Politically, Spain's two age-old problems remained: backwardness and the domination of the Church, in a world among the poorest in Europe.
Poverty was the country's hallmark, and its main consequence was emigration, which involved at least 500,000 people out of a population of 18.5 million. Indicators of economic and social backwardness were all upward: illiteracy stood at 64%, and agriculture, whose yield did not exceed a minimum level of consumption, employed approximately two-thirds of the workers.
Two secular powers reigned: the army and the Catholic Church. The Church was a medieval remnant, with 80,000 priests, monks, and nuns. There were 2,919 convents and 763 monasteries, housing 44,965 people, of whom 36,509 were monks and 8,396 were nuns. The Church, in fact, was the largest capitalist entity in the country, it owned 11,000 rural properties, 7,828 urban properties (1). The Church also had strong interests in urban real estate, in industry, in banking, in finance. In a country where half of the inhabitants were illiterate, the Catholic school performed an essential social service. The backwardness of the clergy was proverbial, suffice it to say that Cardinal Segura, considered the most authoritative incarnation of the Faith, considered the bathroom an instrument of the devil and liberalism a danger to the faith. A large portion of the population had reached the point of tolerance for the intolerable abuses and injustices, and some had even, over time, assimilated the practice of rebellion and self-management for social redemption. This was the spark for the series of revolts that, from the beginning of the last century, exploded in July 1936.
If this picture is already quite anomalous in the European landscape, the historical narrative of the Spanish Revolution is even more so. The very name "Spanish Civil War," used in the singular, is misleading, as it was a true civil war, the bloodiest in history. Officially, five hundred thousand victims, probably double that. Everyone uses the singular for the event, but it was the fourth civil conflict. The three previous ones, the Carlist Wars, fought during the 19th century, had pitted the two ever-present fronts in modern Iberian affairs: the clerical and anticlerical. But it is above all the current historiographical view and the common perception of the event that has produced the greatest mystification of contemporary history. The most radical class conflict and the most profound revolutionary attempt ever experienced in human history was instead narrated as the first confrontation between anti-fascism and fascism in Europe, a foreshadowing of what would happen a few years later through the national resistance movements against the Nazi-Fascist regimes.
The International Brigades that came to the Republic's aid were considered a tangible sign of this foreshadowing of the struggle for freedom and democracy. In short, the image of the internalization of the conflict prevailed, to the detriment of all the specific premises and motivations intrinsic to the Spanish events, focusing solely on the ideological aspect of the conflict or on the external support both sides received. It is important to immediately clarify the political rationale for this historiographical construction.
The Comintern (the Moscow-led Third International) had long since developed a precise strategy for the future European scenario, based on a political division of Europe into two areas of influence, the Soviet one and the American one. The national resistance movements operating in their respective geopolitical quadrants had to create a front with politically allied forces. From this perspective, the defense of the Spanish Republic and the alliance of communist and socialist forces with bourgeois republican and democratic forces fulfilled this plan, while the revolutionary achievements of the anarchists and their allies in the POUM, through self-management, land and factory requisitions, and collectivization, represented the opposite of the strategic political plan of the Third International. From this perspective, the tragic weeks of May 1937 in Barcelona, with the clashes between anarchists and communists, must be understood. But above all, the construction of the narrative of Spanish events, such as the defense of the Republic and the "democratic" rather than revolutionary choice, is well understood. But the greatest historical fault was and is that of having erased from historiographical memory the decisive weight of culture, religious tradition, and the economic and political influence that the Catholic Church had on Iberian society and history since its formation. Without starting from this fact, it is impossible to understand what happened starting in the summer of 1936. Franco's rebellion was the epilogue of a long march that began in 1492 and led to the unification of Spain a few decades later. Spain's continental power in the 16th and 17th centuries was formed and accompanied by the foundation and development of the Holy Inquisition, and by the most powerful Catholic order, the Jesuits. The idea of nationhood finally merged definitively with the Catholic faith in the anti-Napoleonic revolt (the only war that saw Napoleon defeated before Waterloo). The epic battle against the French was not simply a polar revolt experienced like the war of independence, one of the many that inflamed the European continent during the 19th century, but it was the revolt of the Catholic Faith against atheism and modernism, against those who had dared to replace reason with God. The anti-Napoleonic resistance played a decisive role in shaping the modernity of National Catholicism. A preponderant segment of the Spanish clergy, those with a traditionalist worldview, have always viewed any change as political and religious heresy. A crucial moment in Spanish history and the Iberian Church was the Napoleonic invasion, which brought modernity with French troops. It was the moment when the Spanish ruling class, the Church, and the aristocracy had to choose: either to move toward new European horizons yet to be discovered or to remain anchored to the certainties of privilege.
The reactionary choice, based on the concept of a crusade, a holy war of religious mobilization, a struggle in which Catholics must mobilize for the salvation of the faith and the unity of Spain, arose from the clergy's patriotic mystique that had developed in 1808 with the anti-Napoleonic guerrilla warfare and the clergy's active participation in the armed struggle. The beginning of the clergy's active participation in the Spanish conflicts can be traced back to the 1808 uprising, which was commonly historiographically considered a sort of Holy War, in which the clergy assumed an undisputed vanguard role in military operations.
The bishop of Belbastro, Augustin, declared in the Aragonese town of Casteion de la Puente: "Let us unite, then, my children, for the common cause in this war. We must all be soldiers, first and foremost. Among you, your unworthy shepherd will be the one who, placed before your face, will raise his left hand to encourage you, with the sacred sign of the victory over sin, and will brandish steel with his right hand to sanctify it with a kind of anointing, immersing it in the blood of his enemies" (2). The Francoist uprising and its success were the apotheosis and the end of this centuries-old journey; this was the long march of Spanish National Catholicism. The difference between Franco's regime and other European fascisms lies in the different ways in which they "sacralized politics." Fascism and Nazism had created the cult of the nation of the people, seeking to forge a unifying bond between the two concepts. The use of symbols, liturgies, and ceremonies was aimed at celebrating a new cult that was intended to give the people the illusion of actively participating, as protagonists, in a national liturgy.
Traditional politics thus took on a new dimension, a wholly religious character; in other words, it reached the sacralization of politics. In the Spanish context, more specifically under Francoism, another experience took shape: politics appropriated the experiences of fascism and Nazism, but with a significant difference: in celebrations and parades, it assumed only the external aspect, but at the same time, and herein lies the difference, it also appropriated, above all, the religious content. It was not just a mixture of terms but a "concelebration" of increasingly overlapping civil and religious rites. It was precisely the ecclesiastical world that "invaded" the civil sphere, being the first to describe the war as a crusade. The symbol of Francoism and National Catholicism is encapsulated in the most famous Francoist poster, which dominated behind Franco's private study and depicted a cross resulting from the intersection of the number one and the word cruzada with the shadow of this first crusade, whose center is Spain embracing the world. This symbolic concept is accompanied by the inscription "ESPANA orientora spiritual del mundo": there could be no more explicit declaration of a universal and divine mission. (3)
Notes
(1) Libertarian Spain Pier Francesco Zarcone Massari Editore
(2) Clergy and Spanish Wars in the Contemporary Age (1808 - 1939) edited by A. Botti Rubattino Editore
(3) Catholic Church and the Spanish Civil War in 1936 edited by A. Tedeschi Guida Editori
This is the link to the Francoist manifesto mentioned in the article.
https://catalogo.beniculturali.it/detail/HistoricOrArtisticProperty/0500660295

https://alternativalibertaria.fdca.it/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center