A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, Umanita Nova #24-25 - Bonuses and Handouts. The Social Policy of the Meloni Government (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sat, 18 Oct 2025 10:37:27 +0300


In recent months, the Meloni government has intensified a practice that has become its trademark: handing out bonuses and presenting them as social policy. Every week a new measure is announced: psychologist bonus, daycare vouchers, rent subsidies, sports vouchers, student benefits. The official narrative is always the same: "we are intervening to help families in difficulty." But on closer inspection, this is nothing more than an elaborate shell game.
The psychologist bonus is perhaps the most well-known case. Presented as a breakthrough after years of health emergencies and growing psychological distress, it turned out to be a mockery: out of nearly 400,000 applications, funds were available for fewer than 10,000 people. The rest must keep paying privately or forgo care altogether. The same goes for rent subsidies: a maximum of EUR1,500 per year, when a three-bedroom apartment in an average city can cost EUR1,000 a month. Daycare? Yes, there is a EUR3,000 voucher per year, but only for those who meet ISEE income thresholds - and only if they can find a spot in increasingly rare public facilities.

These measures share recurring features:

they are temporary, lasting a year or slightly more;

they are selective, accessible only to those who navigate bureaucratic hurdles and "click-day" rushes;

they never address the real causes of the social crisis (low wages, widespread precarity, privatization of healthcare and education);

they create competition among the poor, turning needs into point-based lotteries where the fastest take all.

The issue is not just the scarcity of resources: it's the logic itself. The state does not invest in structural policies but distributes handouts. It does not build universal rights but offers one-off checks. In this way, collective needs are fragmented and individualized. Everyone chases their own voucher, their own application, their own ISEE code. The idea of fighting together for a living wage, free and accessible healthcare, and high-quality public education is replaced by the illusion of receiving a small state favor.

Meanwhile, the numbers tell another story. Over the last fifteen years, public healthcare has suffered cuts amounting to EUR37 billion, with hospitals closed, emergency rooms overwhelmed, and endless waiting lists. Education spending remains among the lowest in Europe. By contrast, Italian military spending has surpassed EUR30 billion annually, growing steadily to meet NATO demands. Billions are found for the Strait Bridge project, while for basic healthcare we are told "sacrifices" are needed.

Behind the façade of bonuses lies a clear political strategy: not to redistribute wealth, not to touch corporate profits, not to strengthen public services. On the contrary: wages and rights remain stagnant while consensus is bought by distributing crumbs. It's a kind of clientelism 2.0: no longer the politician handing out subsidies, but a digital portal deciding who gets the handout.

This mechanism is not only ineffective - it's dangerous. Because it prevents building collective awareness. Because it encourages people to see the state as an occasional benefactor rather than as the culprit of the social disaster. Because it fragments struggles, reducing them to individual races for access to small subsidies.

As anarchists, we denounce this logic. We expect nothing from governments that dismantle rights and give back alms. The answer lies elsewhere: in direct solidarity, mutual aid, and grassroots organization. Where the state reduces needs to protocol numbers and waiting lists, we can build real networks of mutual support, self-managed spaces, and forms of struggle that restore dignity and power to people.

We don't need bonuses: we need social justice. We don't want handouts: we want freedom, wages, housing, healthcare, education. Everything governments deny us can only be won by fighting together.

Totò Caggese

https://umanitanova.org/bonus-e-mancette-la-politica-sociale-del-governo-meloni/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center