A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, Umanita Nova #24/25 - The Lion and the Horse. Evictions in Milan (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sat, 20 Sep 2025 06:08:45 +0300


In a general context of a radical crisis in traditional geopolitical balances, and as war once again loomed over the Old Continent, the Italian government decided to contribute to the social effervescence with the eviction on Thursday, August 21st, of the Leoncavallo Spazio Pubblico Autogestito (Self-Managed Public Space), or, if you prefer its evocative acronym, Leoncavallo SPA. As is well known, the eviction was "peaceful," and the occupants' response was a demonstration on September 6th, which saw a more than robust national and citywide turnout-an unusual and, given the times, even surprising turnout.

How can we explain the fact that tens of thousands of people took to the streets in support of Leoncavallo and that there was a coming together of political, social, and cultural entities that were not only and not so much different as radically, at least generally, disconnected?

I propose an extreme case precisely because I believe it gives a reasonable idea of the variety of actors involved.

Bebo Storti, who along with Paolo Rossi, Claudio Bisio, Gigi Alberti, Antonio Catania, and Renato Sarti took part in the national march for the Leoncavallo and, together with them, unfurled a yellow banner with the words "Comedians," the title of the show directed by Gabriele Salvatores that was a huge success in 1985, states: "We're a bunch of idiots, but we have a civic sense. It's important to be here to talk about the Leoncavallo and the disgusting act they committed during the eviction. Piantedosi instinctively accepted this ass-kissing of the government. We know how it went. It was a political closure."

Well, director Salvatores was present this morning at Giorgio Armani's funeral chapel, where he emphasized the importance of demonstrating for the Leoncavallo. In other words, he saw no contradiction between supporting Leonka and paying homage to a leading figure of the Milanese bourgeoisie, so much so that he called for the participation of a segment of the bourgeoisie, perhaps the liberal, urban bourgeoisie, in the mobilization.

I believe an answer to the question is possible if we take into account several facts:

The very brutality of the government's actions, after years of torpor and acceptance of the status quo ante, has affected, if not "public opinion," at least a segment of people who frequent or have frequented social centers, who appreciate transgressive art and culture, and who are nevertheless positioned on the left at a time when, despite the right-wing government, a certain esprit de corps characterizes the left, however one understands the term;

The reaction to the eviction has overlapped with the mobilization in favor of the Palestinians, which is decidedly lively and has a large following among the younger generations. It's a case in which internal warfare, in the form of attacks on "non-compliant" gathering places, and external warfare, indirectly supporting the slaughter of the Gazan population, were perceived in their relations, and, in any case, sectors of the movement created a synergy.
The eviction of the Leonka occurred at a time when there is more than a passing attention to a housing policy that favors the bourgeois elite and severely penalizes a significant portion of the working classes, those who were unable to buy a home in better years and must resort to renting, out-of-town students, and the like. Public opinion is quite sensitive to the legal proceedings of the city's political and administrative class and perceives the bipartisan nature of the blockade of those who have seized the city, to quote a famous film.
Returning to the eviction, the Leoncavallo has a complex legal case behind it, which sets a complicated precedent for other occupations as well. Indeed, it should be noted that the Ministry of the Interior was ordered to compensate the Cabassi family, represented by the Prefect, for failing to carry out the eviction. The judge ruled against the Association of Anti-Fascist Mothers of Leoncavallo, whose president, Marina Boer, was ordered to pay EUR3 million in compensation for the failure to evict the real estate company that owns the property at Via Watteau 7.

It should also be noted that over the years, Leoncavallo and local governments have engaged in complex and unproductive negotiations aimed at "normalizing" the situation. For some time now, Leonka, faced with a conciliatory attitude from the current mayor, has been working to have its "social value" recognized by the institutions. (Mayor Sala, when questioned by the press in recent weeks, responded to some journalists regarding Leoncavallo by acknowledging its "high social and cultural value for the city," at least in words, pointing to the tender for a warehouse on Via San Dionigi, in the Porto di Mare area, as a plausible solution.)

Out of respect for the intelligence of my thirty-three readers, I won't dwell on the fact that the "social value" recognized by the institutions-specifically, by institutions heavily involved in the renovation for the benefit of the city's high-income classes-is somewhat laughable.

Precisely this complexity of the Leonka story-a radical and self-managed birth, an institutional drift, and countless legal issues-determines the fact that there are at least two Leonkas: one SPA and one, perhaps more in the imagination than in actuality, a Self-Managed Public Space.

The demonstration of September 6th asserted the Leonka's character as a movement and emphasized the need to oppose government policy with mass mobilization regarding public spaces, the right to housing, access to services, etc.

It therefore sets the stage, or at least could set the stage, for a paradigm shift on the part of the movements, a paradigm shift that places the governance of cities, the definition of decision-making bodies, and the intertwining of welfare demands at its center.

In other words, it's about organizing, in Milan and elsewhere, a mobilization against the city's bosses. This could involve citizens' committees on various issues, social centers and occupied spaces, and grassroots unions for both workers and tenants.

A path that, in my opinion, deserves in-depth discussion and debate.

Cosimo Scarinzi

https://umanitanova.org/il-leone-e-il-cavallo-sgomberi-a-milano/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center