A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova: The Chain of Death. NATO Summit (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sun, 14 Sep 2025 07:54:15 +0300


"We will make NATO even greater. Today, all of us allies have laid the foundations to make NATO stronger, more equitable, and more lethal." At the conclusion of the Atlantic Alliance summit held in The Hague on June 24 and 25, Secretary General Mark Rutte emphasized the results of what many analysts (see in particular Gianandrea Gaiani, editor of Analisi Difesa) saw as a chicken coop theater, with a "peacock master"-Donald Trump-and countless "adoring chickens," the heads of state of the other 31 member states.

"The United States today appears no longer as a great ally but as the true master, which, in addition to spying on Europeans like a big brother, also demands devotion, blind obedience, and glorification of its own deeds and those of its leader," writes Gaiani. At the Hague Summit, NATO is effectively dead as an alliance, even though it survives as a sort of feudal empire in which the sovereign seeks and obtains subservience and adulation from his submissive vassals.

At the summit, the US president presented himself as the peace-making knight of the Apocalypse after imposing an armed truce between Israel and Iran with the sound of super-bombs. He reminded his European "vassals" that there is no NATO without Washington's overwhelming military-nuclear power, and if the allies still want US-made armed forces on the borders with Russia and Belarus, they will have to use the European Union as a cash machine to finance the reconversion of the economy and industrial production to military purposes. Above all, they will have to buy US-made weapons and munitions and support the insane race for space and nuclear rearmament and Washington's unbridled ambitions for power in the Indo-Pacific.

To hold on to the much-admired "peacock," NATO partners have agreed to undergo the greatest economic, financial, and social shock in post-World War II history: allocating 5% of GDP to military spending within ten years, focusing specifically on the development and production of increasingly sophisticated warfare technologies, aerospace and satellite systems, drones, tanks, and conventional and nuclear munitions. This hemorrhage of public money will benefit transnational financial capital, destroying welfare, education, public healthcare, and social services across the continent. "In the White House's assessment, the 5% defense target has financial and commercial value: European allies should purchase US weapons to rebalance the trade balance between the two sides of the Atlantic and avoid the US tariffs that Trump himself threatens to impose on all allies on a daily basis," Gianandrea Gaiani notes.

For the most reluctant allies, Mark Rutte has devised an accounting trick that barely changes the dire future of EU-NATO countries: the 5% of GDP will be reached by adding the 3.5% share to be covered by state budgets for weapons and troops, with 1.5% for "national security spending": cybersecurity, protection of critical infrastructure (power plants and telecommunications networks), border defense, military police equipment and personnel, medical facilities against nuclear, chemical, and biological attacks, conversion of logistics and transportation infrastructure (railways, highways, bridges, ports, and airports) to military use, research and innovation in the defense industry, etc.

"Our investments will ensure the availability of the necessary forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, operational readiness, and resilience, in line with our three core tasks: deterrence and defense, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security," reads the final resolution approved at the NATO summit. We reaffirm our shared commitment to rapidly expand transatlantic defense cooperation and to harness emerging technologies and the spirit of innovation to advance our collective security. We will work to eliminate defense trade barriers among Allies and leverage our partnerships to foster cooperation.

After launching the DIANA - Defense Innovation Accelerator program to "accelerate dual-use innovation in new technologies" (millions of dollars for research and development centers across the country; in Italy, in Turin, La Spezia, and Capua), NATO launched a Rapid Adoption Action Plan to "strengthen and accelerate" the adoption and integration of new military technology products. "The Allies commit to accelerating adoption procedures, including accelerated procurement, and to allocating adequate resources to this end," reads the final resolution of the 2025 Summit. "The Allies will embrace greater acquisition risks in the early stages of development and improve the communication of demand signals within NATO. The Military Production Action Plan responds to the need to produce more and more quickly."

Among the most significant developments, especially in terms of resources and "investments," is the approval in The Hague of the first Commercial Space Strategy. The strategy aims to enable NATO countries to "integrate more flexible and timely commercial solutions, both in peacetime and conflict," offering greater "business opportunities" to companies operating in the aerospace sector and increasingly closer coordination with the Alliance.

NATO's business pro-private capital approach, emerging from the June summit in the Netherlands, has given rise to several multinational, multi-million-dollar projects. Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Norway, the Netherlands, Poland, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Turkey, and Italy have commissioned the acquisition, storage, transportation, and management of "essential defense raw materials" (particularly lithium, titanium, and other rare earth minerals), which are highly sought after by industries in the supply chain of death. With the High Visibility Project-the name of the strategic minerals stockpile program-NATO aims to "reduce demand vulnerability as well as supplier dependence."

New impetus has also been given to the program to strengthen the NATO Multi-Role Tanker Transport Fleet (MMF). The NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) has signed a contract with the German giant Airbus Defence and Space for the supply of two additional A330 tankers, adding to the twelve already in operation with the allied fleet. Launched in 2012, the MMF program enjoys financial support from the European Union. One of its main operational hubs is being built at the Sigonella Naval Air Station, the largest US and NATO base in the central Mediterranean. At the Sicilian installation, runway expansion is underway to accommodate the landing of large tanker aircraft from the US Air Force and Alliance partners, following the acquisition of approximately 100 hectares of land designated for agricultural use.

Further serious consequences in terms of territorial militarization will be generated by another major project under the Rapid Adoption Action Plan, the NATO Innovation Ranges. Specifically, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Italy will create a large number of "ranges" for the testing and integration of new advanced military systems. "This is a key intervention aimed at accelerating the innovative adoption and launch of new technologies and increasing production capacity through the inclusion of non-traditional suppliers in the defense industrial base," NATO leaders explain. "These testing grounds will allow Allied partners to test, refine, and validate technological products in operationally realistic environments."

Although "apostle of peace" Trump arrived in The Hague with an olive branch regarding Washington's future relations with Russian President Putin, the NATO summit's final document reaffirms absolute hostility to Russia and full military and political support for Ukraine. "United in the face of profound security threats and challenges, particularly the long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security and the persistent threat of terrorism (...), the Allies reaffirm their sovereign and enduring commitment to provide support to Ukraine, whose security contributes to our own," the 32 NATO leaders agreed.

Secretary General Rutte's words were even more bellicose. "Russia is a short- and long-term threat to the Alliance, and our intelligence suggests it could be ready to attack NATO within the next three to seven years; the threat from Russia is clear, and we must be able to defend ourselves," he warned at the opening of the summit. European NATO countries will shoulder even more of Ukraine's war expenses. During the first half of 2025, "military aid" worth EUR35 billion was sent to the government in Kiev, but Mark Rutte reiterated his intention to exceed EUR50 billion by the end of the year.

The Italian government presented itself more united than ever before at Mr. Trump's court. Before departing for the Netherlands, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni expressed in Parliament her full support and devotion to the blood, sweat, and tears program of 5% of GDP per year for war spending. The Milex Observatory on Military Spending has attempted to quantify the amount of financial resources that will be diverted from the state budget to fuel the weapons systems market. The 3.5% cash target alone will entail spending of no less than EUR700 billion over the next ten years, approximately EUR220 billion more than would be spent over the same period with a 2% GDP target. If the full 5% target were met, EUR964 billion would be spent over the next ten years, or EUR445 billion more than the 2% target, with an average annual additional resources of EUR44 billion. The many "external" wars that Italy is engaged in would thus be compounded by a full-blown "internal war" against the most disadvantaged social classes.

Antonio Mazzeo

https://umanitanova.org/la-filiera-della-morte-vertice-nato/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center