|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Francais_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkurkish_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Spaine, Regeneracion: The Transition Phase in Anarchism By Miguel G. (de, en, it, pt, tr)[Automatic translation]
Date
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:09:20 +0300
As soon as there are revolutionary proposals for systemic change, those
who propose these social changes often consider initiating a transition
period. This is due to the difficulty of immediately implementing the
revolutionary model, as there would logically be resistance from the
population who are unfamiliar with or do not share this new social
model. ---- In Marxism, the issue is resolved with the dictatorship of
the proletariat, which, according to some of its proponents, will be a
transitional period that will use the levers and mechanisms of the
bourgeois state to gradually implement socialism. To launch the
socialist state, a great force is required to organize and direct this
process: the Communist Party. Thus, the Party will become the State in
this phase. Later, according to Marxism, the state should be dissolved
or disbanded, as the socialist model advances.
We already know the practical outcome of this political gamble, as it
has been applied numerous times. Bakunin himself, before countries
implemented the dictatorship of the proletariat, warned of its dangers:
A convinced enemy of the State and of all economic, political, legal,
and religious institutions of the State; an enemy in general of
everything that, in the language of doctrinaires, is called the
beneficial guardianship exercised in any form by intelligent and
naturally disinterested minorities over the masses; Convinced that the
economic emancipation of the proletariat, the great liberty, the real
liberty of individuals and the masses, and the universal organization of
human equality and justice-that the humanization of the human herd, in a
word, is incompatible with the existence of the State or any other form
of authoritarian organization-since 1868, the time of my entry into the
International in Geneva, I began a crusade against the very principle of
authority. I began to publicly preach the abolition of States, the
abolition of all governments, of everything called domination, tutelage,
power, including, of course, the so-called revolutionary and provisional
abolition that the Jacobins of the International, whether disciples of
Marx or not, recommend to us as an absolutely necessary means of
transition, that's what they claim, to consolidate and organize the
victory of the proletariat. I always thought, and I think today more
than ever, that this dictatorship, a disguised resurrection of the
State, can never produce any effect other than to paralyze and kill the
very vitality and power of the popular revolution. 1
Consequently, we can ask ourselves the question of what body replaces
the state in these moments of transition, when libertarian communism has
not yet been fully established. Bakunin himself, in his Revolutionary
Catechism, gives us an outline of an answer:
The internal reorganization of each country on the basis of the absolute
freedom of each individual, of productive associations, and of communities.
The basic unit of every political organization in each country must be
the completely autonomous community, constituted by the majority vote of
all adults of both sexes.
The province must be nothing other than a free federation of autonomous
communities.
The nation must be nothing other than a federation of autonomous provinces.
It is probable, and highly desirable, that when the hour of the People's
Revolution once again strikes, all nations will unite in fraternal
solidarity and forge an inalienable alliance against the coalition of
reactionary nations. This alliance will be the seed of the future
Universal Federation of Peoples, which, if possible, will encompass the
entire world. The International Federation of Revolutionary Peoples,
with a Parliament, a Tribunal, and an International Executive Committee,
is naturally based on the principles of the revolution.
Intelligent and free labor will necessarily be collective labor. Each
person, of course, will be free to work alone or collectively. But there
is no doubt that, apart from the work best performed by an individual,
everyone will prefer collective labor in industrial or even scientific
enterprises. Because association splendidly multiplies the productive
capacity of each worker; consequently, a member cooperating in a
productive association will earn more in less time. When free productive
associations (which will include members of cooperatives and labor
organizations) organize voluntarily according to their specific needs
and abilities, they will transcend all national boundaries and form an
immense universal economic federation.
This organization will include an Industrial Parliament to which the
associations will provide accurate, detailed, and large-scale
statistics. By quantifying stocks and demand, the Parliament will
distribute and allocate world industrial production to the various
nations. Trade and industrial crises, stagnation (unemployment), the
erosion of capital, and so on, will cease to plague humanity; the
emancipation of human labor will regenerate the world.2
With all this, we can see the society Bakunin advocated. We highlight
the fragments on the territorial model and the one dedicated to the
grouping of labor, as these are the two most relevant aspects when
building societies.
When we examine the Spanish Revolution from this perspective, we can see
that the period of transition to libertarian communism was
collectivization. The CNT-FAI admitted that they did not have the
strength throughout the entire republican territory. They accepted that
they were in a war where they were risking everything against fascism.
They concluded that they had to wait for the implementation of
libertarian communism and that they would have to come to an
understanding with their republican, socialist, and communist allies.
The social revolution erupted from below, overwhelming the CNT-FAI
itself. Therefore, since they had a revolutionary process in hand, the
libertarian movement tried to protect it as much as possible and even
expand it. They did this by participating in republican state
institutions. Therefore, the "transitional society to socialism"
consisted of collectives, economic socialization measures, confederal
cooperatives, unions, militias, and the entire complex framework
surrounding them. This transitional society took place during a
large-scale war.
However, this example is still distant compared to today's society,
since we live with a very solid state apparatus and no proletarian or
popular revolutions in sight. In our current movement, we often say that
the transition period is now. It is people's power. The constructive
aspect of revolutionary anarchism is essential to paving the way for a
new socialist society.
So, what could replace the capitalist state? Well, a combination of the
current elements in which we operate: labor unions, housing unions,
socially oriented cooperatives, communal land recovery initiatives,
neighborhood assemblies, and many other collectives. This entire amalgam
of projects is already functioning, and we wouldn't have to invent anything.
The role of revolutionary anarchism in this scenario would be twofold:
First, to instill revolutionary and strategic thinking in this social
movement. It is necessary for the people who participate in these
projects to fully believe in the importance of their organization or
collective in the conquest of the new society. Without a strong social
fabric and the ambition to grow to become hegemonic, it will be
difficult to have transition periods or revolutions.
Second, to articulate the various social projects, each operating
independently, to create a movement as homogeneous as possible. In the
same sense, their mission is also to counter the efforts of reformist
sectors that, in every struggle, will try to integrate them into the system.
Creating a Strong People does not mean creating a vanguard expert in
street riots. It implies creating popular institutions that function
outside the state. An example of this is the Popular Assembly of
Manizales (Colombia). It was a popular institution that emerged from a
strike that occupied the city's textile factory. It went so far as to
issue decrees calling for a civic strike and extend the self-managed strike.
This is just one example of a social conflict (a strike) that escalates
and aspires to territorial control, creating a broad social structure
(the popular assembly). There are many examples of this in modern times:
from the Argentine Cordobazo, the Chilean industrial belts and
especially the Popular Assembly of Concepción, the Shoras in the Iranian
revolution, the Zapatista autonomous municipalities in rebellion (and
elsewhere as well), the Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca, or
the cantonal system of Rojava.
People's power, although it can develop in capitalist societies, will
have a greater impact when states are in crisis. On the one hand, these
states will be unable to ensure the material well-being of their
populations, and on the other, the people will build their own social
organizations. The possibility of the state collapsing is becoming
realistic, and therefore these counter-power structures have the
potential to take control of their territory.
Obviously, this will have to be done on a large scale, preventing the
state from strengthening and rearming itself and destroying this entire
new society. For this reason, revolutionary anarchism must have a global
vision of the situation, without falling into localism, ensuring that
the self-defense of liberated societies is capable of defeating states.
This is the crux of the matter, the barrier against which most
revolutions have crashed. In other words, in previous revolutions, the
anarchist movement managed to establish its new model through new
sociopolitical structures, but it was unable to defeat states because it
lacked decisive military force, not because its social model suffered
from fundamental organic flaws.
Right now, we're talking about environmental collapse. Although we don't
expect any systemic crisis in the West, it won't be long before we see
states focusing on wars, abandoning the so-called "welfare state."
Certain neighborhoods and towns will be left to their fate, governed
manu militari by police forces, and could potentially fall into the
hands of unscrupulous mafias.
Without going any further, we have seen similar situations in the areas
affected by the Valencian DANA. The far right went all out in the first
two days to undermine Pedro Sánchez's government. Truckloads of aid
appeared overnight. Fascist influencers roamed the muddy streets, and
even squatters thugs appeared sporadically. But it was all a media
bluff. The social fabric reacted and did not shy away from its
solidarity, reversing a tense situation in just a few weeks.
Our task, as a revolutionary tendency of the popular movement, is to get
involved in these types of events, supporting the processes of popular
power that occur and initiating those necessary for our goal of building
libertarian communism. We understand that popular power, if properly
articulated, can give rise to a liberated society on a large scale.
By Miguel G. Gómez @blackspartak
1. Bakunin, Letter to Anselmo Lorenzo, May 10, 1872, p. 7,
(http://www.fondationbesnard.org/IMG/pdf/Carta_de_Miguel...o.pdf).
2. Bakunin, Revolutionary Catechism, 1866
(https://es.anarchistlibraries.net/library/mijail-bakunin-catecismo-revolucionario)
3. José, Grupo Libertario Vía Libre, Outline for a History of Anarchism
in Colombia (1968-1991). Part One.
(https://grupovialibre.org/2011/01/17/esbozo-para-una-historia-del-anarquismo-en-colombia-1968-1991-primera-parte-por-jose-grupo-libertario-via-libre/)
4. Danny Monsálvez Araneda. The People's Assembly in Concepción. The
expression of popular power
(https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/historia/article/view/6381)
https://www.regeneracionlibertaria.org/2025/08/12/la-fase-de-transicion-en-el-anarquismo/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) France, Monde Libertaire - Ideas and Struggles: Life Without Principle (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Mexico, FAM, Regeneracion #19 - Editorial: Pacifists, Not Passivists (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center