A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Spaine, Regeneracion: The Transition Phase in Anarchism By Miguel G. (de, en, it, pt, tr)[Automatic translation]

Date Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:09:20 +0300


As soon as there are revolutionary proposals for systemic change, those who propose these social changes often consider initiating a transition period. This is due to the difficulty of immediately implementing the revolutionary model, as there would logically be resistance from the population who are unfamiliar with or do not share this new social model. ---- In Marxism, the issue is resolved with the dictatorship of the proletariat, which, according to some of its proponents, will be a transitional period that will use the levers and mechanisms of the bourgeois state to gradually implement socialism. To launch the socialist state, a great force is required to organize and direct this process: the Communist Party. Thus, the Party will become the State in this phase. Later, according to Marxism, the state should be dissolved or disbanded, as the socialist model advances.

We already know the practical outcome of this political gamble, as it has been applied numerous times. Bakunin himself, before countries implemented the dictatorship of the proletariat, warned of its dangers:

A convinced enemy of the State and of all economic, political, legal, and religious institutions of the State; an enemy in general of everything that, in the language of doctrinaires, is called the beneficial guardianship exercised in any form by intelligent and naturally disinterested minorities over the masses; Convinced that the economic emancipation of the proletariat, the great liberty, the real liberty of individuals and the masses, and the universal organization of human equality and justice-that the humanization of the human herd, in a word, is incompatible with the existence of the State or any other form of authoritarian organization-since 1868, the time of my entry into the International in Geneva, I began a crusade against the very principle of authority. I began to publicly preach the abolition of States, the abolition of all governments, of everything called domination, tutelage, power, including, of course, the so-called revolutionary and provisional abolition that the Jacobins of the International, whether disciples of Marx or not, recommend to us as an absolutely necessary means of transition, that's what they claim, to consolidate and organize the victory of the proletariat. I always thought, and I think today more than ever, that this dictatorship, a disguised resurrection of the State, can never produce any effect other than to paralyze and kill the very vitality and power of the popular revolution. 1

Consequently, we can ask ourselves the question of what body replaces the state in these moments of transition, when libertarian communism has not yet been fully established. Bakunin himself, in his Revolutionary Catechism, gives us an outline of an answer:

The internal reorganization of each country on the basis of the absolute freedom of each individual, of productive associations, and of communities.

The basic unit of every political organization in each country must be the completely autonomous community, constituted by the majority vote of all adults of both sexes.

The province must be nothing other than a free federation of autonomous communities.

The nation must be nothing other than a federation of autonomous provinces.

It is probable, and highly desirable, that when the hour of the People's Revolution once again strikes, all nations will unite in fraternal solidarity and forge an inalienable alliance against the coalition of reactionary nations. This alliance will be the seed of the future Universal Federation of Peoples, which, if possible, will encompass the entire world. The International Federation of Revolutionary Peoples, with a Parliament, a Tribunal, and an International Executive Committee, is naturally based on the principles of the revolution.

Intelligent and free labor will necessarily be collective labor. Each person, of course, will be free to work alone or collectively. But there is no doubt that, apart from the work best performed by an individual, everyone will prefer collective labor in industrial or even scientific enterprises. Because association splendidly multiplies the productive capacity of each worker; consequently, a member cooperating in a productive association will earn more in less time. When free productive associations (which will include members of cooperatives and labor organizations) organize voluntarily according to their specific needs and abilities, they will transcend all national boundaries and form an immense universal economic federation.
This organization will include an Industrial Parliament to which the associations will provide accurate, detailed, and large-scale statistics. By quantifying stocks and demand, the Parliament will distribute and allocate world industrial production to the various nations. Trade and industrial crises, stagnation (unemployment), the erosion of capital, and so on, will cease to plague humanity; the emancipation of human labor will regenerate the world.2

With all this, we can see the society Bakunin advocated. We highlight the fragments on the territorial model and the one dedicated to the grouping of labor, as these are the two most relevant aspects when building societies.

When we examine the Spanish Revolution from this perspective, we can see that the period of transition to libertarian communism was collectivization. The CNT-FAI admitted that they did not have the strength throughout the entire republican territory. They accepted that they were in a war where they were risking everything against fascism. They concluded that they had to wait for the implementation of libertarian communism and that they would have to come to an understanding with their republican, socialist, and communist allies. The social revolution erupted from below, overwhelming the CNT-FAI itself. Therefore, since they had a revolutionary process in hand, the libertarian movement tried to protect it as much as possible and even expand it. They did this by participating in republican state institutions. Therefore, the "transitional society to socialism" consisted of collectives, economic socialization measures, confederal cooperatives, unions, militias, and the entire complex framework surrounding them. This transitional society took place during a large-scale war.

However, this example is still distant compared to today's society, since we live with a very solid state apparatus and no proletarian or popular revolutions in sight. In our current movement, we often say that the transition period is now. It is people's power. The constructive aspect of revolutionary anarchism is essential to paving the way for a new socialist society.

So, what could replace the capitalist state? Well, a combination of the current elements in which we operate: labor unions, housing unions, socially oriented cooperatives, communal land recovery initiatives, neighborhood assemblies, and many other collectives. This entire amalgam of projects is already functioning, and we wouldn't have to invent anything.

The role of revolutionary anarchism in this scenario would be twofold:

First, to instill revolutionary and strategic thinking in this social movement. It is necessary for the people who participate in these projects to fully believe in the importance of their organization or collective in the conquest of the new society. Without a strong social fabric and the ambition to grow to become hegemonic, it will be difficult to have transition periods or revolutions.
Second, to articulate the various social projects, each operating independently, to create a movement as homogeneous as possible. In the same sense, their mission is also to counter the efforts of reformist sectors that, in every struggle, will try to integrate them into the system.
Creating a Strong People does not mean creating a vanguard expert in street riots. It implies creating popular institutions that function outside the state. An example of this is the Popular Assembly of Manizales (Colombia). It was a popular institution that emerged from a strike that occupied the city's textile factory. It went so far as to issue decrees calling for a civic strike and extend the self-managed strike.

This is just one example of a social conflict (a strike) that escalates and aspires to territorial control, creating a broad social structure (the popular assembly). There are many examples of this in modern times: from the Argentine Cordobazo, the Chilean industrial belts and especially the Popular Assembly of Concepción, the Shoras in the Iranian revolution, the Zapatista autonomous municipalities in rebellion (and elsewhere as well), the Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca, or the cantonal system of Rojava.

People's power, although it can develop in capitalist societies, will have a greater impact when states are in crisis. On the one hand, these states will be unable to ensure the material well-being of their populations, and on the other, the people will build their own social organizations. The possibility of the state collapsing is becoming realistic, and therefore these counter-power structures have the potential to take control of their territory.

Obviously, this will have to be done on a large scale, preventing the state from strengthening and rearming itself and destroying this entire new society. For this reason, revolutionary anarchism must have a global vision of the situation, without falling into localism, ensuring that the self-defense of liberated societies is capable of defeating states. This is the crux of the matter, the barrier against which most revolutions have crashed. In other words, in previous revolutions, the anarchist movement managed to establish its new model through new sociopolitical structures, but it was unable to defeat states because it lacked decisive military force, not because its social model suffered from fundamental organic flaws.

Right now, we're talking about environmental collapse. Although we don't expect any systemic crisis in the West, it won't be long before we see states focusing on wars, abandoning the so-called "welfare state." Certain neighborhoods and towns will be left to their fate, governed manu militari by police forces, and could potentially fall into the hands of unscrupulous mafias.

Without going any further, we have seen similar situations in the areas affected by the Valencian DANA. The far right went all out in the first two days to undermine Pedro Sánchez's government. Truckloads of aid appeared overnight. Fascist influencers roamed the muddy streets, and even squatters thugs appeared sporadically. But it was all a media bluff. The social fabric reacted and did not shy away from its solidarity, reversing a tense situation in just a few weeks.

Our task, as a revolutionary tendency of the popular movement, is to get involved in these types of events, supporting the processes of popular power that occur and initiating those necessary for our goal of building libertarian communism. We understand that popular power, if properly articulated, can give rise to a liberated society on a large scale.

By Miguel G. Gómez @blackspartak

1. Bakunin, Letter to Anselmo Lorenzo, May 10, 1872, p. 7, (http://www.fondationbesnard.org/IMG/pdf/Carta_de_Miguel...o.pdf).
2. Bakunin, Revolutionary Catechism, 1866 (https://es.anarchistlibraries.net/library/mijail-bakunin-catecismo-revolucionario)
3. José, Grupo Libertario Vía Libre, Outline for a History of Anarchism in Colombia (1968-1991). Part One.
(https://grupovialibre.org/2011/01/17/esbozo-para-una-historia-del-anarquismo-en-colombia-1968-1991-primera-parte-por-jose-grupo-libertario-via-libre/)
4. Danny Monsálvez Araneda. The People's Assembly in Concepción. The expression of popular power (https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/historia/article/view/6381)

https://www.regeneracionlibertaria.org/2025/08/12/la-fase-de-transicion-en-el-anarquismo/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center