A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, OCL CA #340 - "The attestation", book by T. Boulakia and N. Mariot at Anamosa (September 2023) (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:34:12 +0300


For 55 days, from March 17 to May 10, 2020, confinement prohibited the movement of the population in France. This book questions how this obedience was imposed through two axes. The first is the analysis of forms of state coercion. The second is reserved for behaviors, conformist or rebellious, and the issues that underlie them. Reading it allows you to extract yourself from your personal experience and to have a general snapshot of this period supported by many examples. We only report the most salient aspects but the work is much richer than this brief summary.

The first part of the book, the longest, returns to the form of confinement applied in France, the State having opted for very strict modalities compared to other countries, in particular by the absolute ban on public spaces which will only rarely be applied elsewhere. However, today, epidemiological studies seem to show that this has at best had only a very weak effect on reducing contamination compared to more flexible policies. The authors therefore question the motives of the different policies and they note that the most coercive States are those which have a greater presence of law enforcement: "There is a marked affinity between confinement and usual repressive practices". France has therefore experienced one of the most severe forms of confinement which is linked to its usual repressive practices, in particular the state of emergency (from November 2015 to November 2017). She will thus experience the obligation to stay at home, with a shower of even more restrictive local regulations which will be added to the national rules. The new legal regime imposed has transformed any person present in public space into a potential offender. Any exit required completing a self-certification on "honour" justifying the reason. This certificate "materializes the double play of constraint and obedience... Do I have my form? Is it full? Am I overstepping the boundaries? Am I at risk of an inspection? ". People "perversely" became the agents of their subjugation, "transforming everyone into their own policeman." Access to public space was regulated by the State and its relays. 100,000 law enforcement officers were mobilized who had little else to do than repress offenders, helped by auxiliaries (game warden, forest ranger... and even hunters). There will be 21 million checks and more than 1 million arbitrary fines because anyone found outside was a priori suspected of an offense (fine for buying only one baguette, for sitting on a bench , to use a bike for shopping, to go out in flip-flops, etc.). It was "a disciplinary device... to monitor and punish" relying on all the available arsenal (from drones to boat or helicopter patrols). This repression particularly affected the poorest and most immigrant areas, with excessive verbalization in working-class neighborhoods ("financial bludgeoning of young men from the "neighborhood"").

The second part discusses the different attitudes during confinement. The authors look at the logic of obedience and we only take up a few of their very interesting analyses. They recall that the repressive situation prohibited organizing collective protest in the public space. Apart from extremely rare public protests (all the media and political organizations have generally relayed the need for this confinement in an uncritical manner), people have had to "tinker" with individual strategies. The absence of public protests should therefore not be understood as a marker of consent because there have been discreet forms of protest (such as chants in windows denouncing the government). A fraction of people frequently circumvented the rules (falsifying certificates, going out beyond 1 km, etc.). Another fraction of the population scrupulously respected the rules imposed in the continuity of respect for the social order. Furthermore, part of the population seems to have remained cloistered at home... and the sociological profile does not refer to elderly people. What explains this compartmentalization refers to cultural and political capital. The unclear nature of the exceptions allowing exits, their frequent modifications, seem to have prevented these people from calmly understanding the possibilities available to them and therefore did not resort to what the law authorized them. There is therefore clearly a social divide in the different strategies adopted, particularly between men and women. Women will be caught between work (a result of the gendered segmentation of the labor market) and domestic activities. In addition, the policing of the home imposed by men means that "confinement has become an additional instrument to regain control over their partner". Finally, the authors return to the numerous accusations and try to understand the levers. Confinement and the permanent imposed promiscuity will generate a nuisance, particularly noise, "instead of saying 'my neighbor is making noise', we could now say 'my neighbor is not respecting the confinement'[...]These denunciations are not emanations of spontaneous popular participation in the restrictions, but are part of the efforts made to protect against their consequences.

This book is rich both in accounts of what really happened during confinement and in detailed analyzes that go beyond the false evidence. However, although the authors discuss methodological constraints at length and in an educational manner, they seem to perhaps overinterpret some statistical results. Despite this minor drawback, the approach taken makes it possible to provide indications on the differentiated strategies during confinement and in the end it is much more their analyzes than the figures presented which are interesting.

VR

http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4173
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center