A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Bulgaria, FAB: Rethinking Struggle and Anarchist Tactics by Denise Kozak (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:19:21 +0300


Notes on the philosophy of anarchism, Actors, Ideas close to us, Position, Politics, ---- World, Articles ---- A discussion text, the idea of which was born in my head while I was in prison. I am talking about why our main task is the need to recreate our counter-society - alternative economic, cultural and political associations of citizens that will become the embryo of a new system. I will briefly outline my vision for the future (which, it seems, does not exist in Russia). I am trying to present the idea that in times of crisis it is the counter-society that will have to make a real revolution in social relations and consciousness through the uprising (I want to believe it) of the working masses.

Do you agree with the thoughts? Show it to your friends. Don't you agree? Criticize - or better yet, suggest. Better yet, show in action what you offer.

We are anarchists - and therefore revolutionaries, because, being bearers of social-revolutionary ideas, we oppose the current state apparatus based on a hierarchically organized structure of society, in which citizens have no real political and civil rights and freedoms, but the actual participation of the civil society in the management of the country (with feedback) is minimal. We do not believe in the possibility of changing the current status quo through elections that exclude real mechanisms and institutions of democracy, because we are convinced that the only legitimate source of power is the people themselves.

In modern Russia, where there is no freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, independent judiciary, freedom of the press, as well as the right to participate in public organizations, the young generation, filled with revolutionary romanticism, wants to achieve the realization of its universal ideals of freedom and justice, being in extremely unstable conditions, in which the whole of Russia is. Not knowing where to start, he tries to organize a radical resistance to the state, which inevitably ends in a long term prison without having time to organize. The other part, which wants social reforms in Russia, but does not try to start doing them, simply does not know where to start.

Fear, passive attitude to what is happening, panic anxiety and fear of one's own fate are the main reasons for the failure of many novice anarchist organizers. It has long been known that a person has only two choices: the desire to escape from the dreary or boring reality into the world of illusions, or a passionate desire for a goal and a willingness to extreme stress and sacrifice to achieve that goal. In the modern world, a person either escapes from the world or changes it. There is no third time. It's time to finally understand that running away from reality is a road to nowhere. Instead, we must act because constant action is the only way to organize.

So where do we start?
Many may think that while in prison I abandoned my former ideological convictions, trying under the guise of revolutionary anarchism to promote reformism among the masses, denying the necessity of revolution and defending the possibility of creating a society of social justice, through the means of gradual evolutionary approach to socialism. But this is not true. I am not proposing incremental improvements to the modern capitalist model. I propose to create a counter-society based on the principles of mutual aid and solidarity, organized on the principles of decentralization and federalism, based on the idea of an association of developed individuals.

But first, it's worth answering a number of questions...

The defeat of the anarchists in Russia
In 2018-2019, the police state launched an offensive against anarchists, which ended with the complete defeat of the anarchist movement in the form in which it existed. Thus, in October 2017, nine young people with left-wing convictions from Penza and St. Petersburg were detained and accused of creating a "terrorist community" that was about to carry out terrorist attacks on Russian territory and started the sensational case network...

A year later, on October 31, 2018, the anarcho-communist Mikhail Zhlobitsky held a direct action at the FSB headquarters in Arkhangelsk to draw attention to the state's torture and repression of anarchists:

"Comrades, now a terrorist act will be committed in the FSB building in Arkhangelsk, for which I take responsibility." This message was left by Mikhail Zhlobitsky on the morning of October 31, 2018, in the anarchist Telegram chat "Speeches of the Rebel". Immediately after the explosion, the FSB and the Ministry of Internal Affairs announced the problem of "youth radicalization" in Russia, promised to fight it and prevent cases like the attack on the FSB. Searches were carried out across the country. Criminal cases for "justification of terrorism" (paragraph 2 of Article 205²) continue to this day - and have affected completely different categories of citizens (from activists to Zhlobitsky's aunt), including me.

In April 2019, RIA Novosti reported that law enforcement officers directly linked the terrorist attack to the anarchist organization "People's Self-Defense", which is why almost all detained anarchists (especially due to publications mentioning Zhlobitsky) became activists of this movement. At my first interrogation, they made it clear to me that they considered me a member of the People's Self-Defense Force, which, as FSB officers put it, was "a sect created by the terrorist Rechkalov." All my claims that I had nothing to do with this organization and that I had never contacted Rechkalov himself were ignored. Later it became known that anarchists were accused of 247 "extremist actions" in 40 cities of Russia, and after the recognition of "People's Self-Defense" as a "terrorist organization" - that it includes up to 400 "radical anarchists".

From the day the Network case began, it became clear: the defeat of the anarchists was beginning. And the way to counteract this - the action of Mikhail Zhlobitsky - led to repressions against the anarchists. It should be noted that it was not Zhlobicki's explosion that became the impetus for repression against anarchists, but rather Zhlobicki's action was a response to state violence against anarchists and full-scale repression of movement participants.

Anarchist errors
Anarchism-as a political tradition hostile to any state whose adherents fundamentally refuse political interaction with the state-has given rise to much heated discussion and debate about the creation of anarchist organizations (including anarchist trade unions), which is why many anarchists strongly oppose the creation of mass organizations. anarchism, defending the principle of action through affinity groups, when activists are grouped on the basis of personal acquaintance. But even affinity groups are unable to withstand the onslaught of the penal structures of the police state.

In modern Russia, since 1993, a political system has been formed that has formal democratic legislation and formal observance of all electoral procedures, as well as other formal signs of democracy, but excludes real mechanisms for maintaining and protecting human rights and civil society there are no real levers for putting pressure on the authorities in order to make certain political decisions. According to political scientist Dmitry Furman, a system of imitation democracy has emerged in Russia, which was predetermined by the illegal and undemocratic nature of the Belovezhsky Agreements. The system of imitation democracy in Russia under Yeltsin successfully overcame three crises: the events of 1993, the presidential elections of 1996, the crisis of the transfer of power in 1999 - and with the election of Putin as president, it was complete, then in Russia has established a "hidden dictatorship".

At the same time, despite pressure and prosecution, anarchists in Russia were able to continue their activities: developing alternative media, creating media projects, organizing cooperatives, open spaces and publishing projects, waging economic struggle in production and supporting environmental actions to always be on the side of the people in their struggle with the state and applying the populist tactic: "go among the people". There were examples of such a struggle, but due to the personal selfishness of individual actors, everything was destroyed.

The only way for anarchists to resist state violence was to organize a political movement free and independent of existing parties and organizations. A movement that cannot be controlled by the system, that cannot be prohibited, and in which there is no interorganizational struggle. Anarchists-including the coming new generation-must be guided by new invincible tactics. Instead of cells of competing organizations, it is necessary to create autonomous decentralized communities, united by the idea of belonging to a common movement, the principles of social activity, interconnectedness, above subcultural struggles and beyond artificial frameworks and dogmas

But in addition to that, remaining anarchists and supporters of the social-revolutionary struggle, it was necessary (and still necessary to this day) to integrate into the Public Observation Commissions (POC) for the protection of human rights in places of forced detention, to cooperate actively - and work together - in the legal field of human rights, to cooperate more actively in the media, to form unions in support of the strike struggle (which continues to this day). In order to support our comrades in captivity and our movement as a whole, it is necessary to develop institutions for extrajudicial protection, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as well as to support individuals carrying out voluntary human rights activities.

At the present moment, Russian anarchists - both in Russia itself and in exile - have only one thing left: to create social initiatives for the achievement of social, charitable, cultural, educational, political, scientific and managerial goals, in the sphere of spiritual satisfaction and other non-material needs of citizens, protection of rights, legitimate interests of citizens and organizations, resolution of disputes and conflicts, provision of legal assistance, as well as for other purposes aimed at achieving public benefits.

We anarchists had to work simultaneously in several fields of revolutionary struggle, but we failed to organize and implement a method of self-defense in the event of state repression, which is why we were defeated without giving us the opportunity to oppose the state monopoly on violence. Someone will rightly say to me: "The state will never allow us to organize!" To which I will reply: "Our defeats are entirely our own fault, because we, incapable of real and necessary struggle, were forced to wait for a revolutionary situation." The problem was us. We have destroyed ourselves. Unwilling to fight the state - including its resources - we betrayed ourselves, betrayed our ideological inspirers, but to a greater extent - without even rudimentary self-defense, we destroyed our comrades, forced to languish in damp prison dungeons.

It will be argued that the tactic of cooperating with POC and working in the legal field in the field of NGOs is hostile and to a greater extent completely contrary to anarchist principles. But it is worth recalling that in 1936 the Spanish anarcho-syndicalists abandoned the idea of a complete boycott of the elections, as a result of which the votes of the members of the National Confederation of Labor - the Spanish confederation of anarcho-syndicalist trade unions, which included more than million people - who went to the polls, ensured the victory of the Popular Front. (NB: What should be done is to enter such organizations in order to tear off their revolutionary parts and attract them to revolutionary positions, as Bakunin did with his entry into the League and the International!) One of the results of it was the release from custody of several thousand political prisoners, the number of strikes increased, which led to one of the most legendary social revolutions of our time, suppressed by the force of reaction. (In the Spanish experience, there are many tactical mistakes THAT DIVERTED US FROM OUR STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE, and facilitated the victory of Francoism!)

What can you do?
It is obvious that in order to achieve the anarchist goals, the struggle must combine the spontaneous insurrectionary practice (which is carried out by the radical groups of BOAK and ERA) with the work of class organizations (the path to the revival of the trade union struggle), and with the activity of purely propaganda groups ( affinity groups and media activists).

The present task of the anarchists must be open opposition to the Russian state, in effect arguing that the only alternative to Russia's modern political system and an urgent need is a society of victorious direct democracy, the highest value of which is the individual who is capable to independently participate in the process of making binding decisions, to participate in the formation and functioning of the self-governing system, as well as to influence the development of domestic and foreign policy.

To do this, we must all make every effort to continue our struggle in the conditions of authoritarianism prevailing in Russia.

In the current situation, the only thing we can do is to organize and support initiatives for social mutual assistance based on the efforts of extra-parliamentary horizontal civil structures. Let's support them not in words, but also in deed.

Instead of endless and mindless arguments and discussions, it is necessary to engage in a multi-sector struggle on the front of the class war to promote public understanding of the need to dismantle the state and capitalism, with the subsequent aim of explaining to the people (the working people) masses our program of revolutionary changes so that they are comprehensible even to those unacquainted with anarchism and left-wing ideas in general, for anarchism is the ideal not only of the advocates of industrial and local self-government, but also of the fighters against violent military service and militarism, as well as pacifists, feminists, eco-activists, human rights activists, free trade union activists, strikers, student movements, LGBT activists, cooperators, journalists - freedom of speech fighters, supporters of the humanization of the penitentiary system, public lifestyle and revival of anarchist pedagogy (the list could be endless).

That is why today it is necessary to provide support (financial, informational, voluntary) to horizontal initiatives for human rights, such as the "Solidarity Zone" and the "Anarchist Black Cross", not forgetting to encourage the development of alternative media, media projects , as well as targeted assistance to those groups who, under the pressure of the security forces, continue to provide support to those in need.

We should all support (create and develop) small initiatives for mutual aid.

We should all support publishing cooperatives such as "Radical Theory and Practice", "Dossier" and other educational initiatives - anarchist book publishing and journalism.

We should all support those who are helping to reduce the number of political prisoners: Vyvozhuk, InTransit.

Don't be afraid to engage with legal human rights mechanisms as well. Support not only in words, but also in deed - after all, even a small donation in support of political prisoners is a thousand times better than silent disagreement with the actions of the FSB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and other criminal structures of Russia. Sending a statement to the prosecutor's office (especially if the protest is widespread) about the fact of torture and other inhuman, degrading forms of punishment is a thousand times better than endlessly discussing it with like-minded people.

All of us must rethink the struggle - and instead of banal and unnecessary graffiti - develop social horizontal initiatives for mutual aid, providing support to a large number of political prisoners, using, among other things, the resources and means that the state gives us, without forgetting about anonymity and security measures. After all, even a rotten POC - having access to the institutions of the penitentiary (penal system) - is still able to affect the improvement of the living conditions of our comrades.

Therefore, our primary task is the need to recreate our counter-society - alternative economic, cultural and political associations of citizens that will become the seed of a new system. During the crisis, they will make a real revolution in social relations and consciousness, due to the uprising of the working masses.

This is what we anarchists call a revolution.

https://www.anarchy.bg
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center