A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, Sicilia Libertaria: What the success of Food for profit tells us - Andrea Turco (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:42:58 +0300


Luckily there are phenomena that are still able to surprise us. One of these is the enormous success of Food for profit. For those who missed it or who have lived on Mars in recent months, Food for profit is a docufilm - it is the most relevant definition because it has the ethics of a documentary and the aesthetics of a film - which is focused on denouncing the system of intensive animal farming and the double thread that links intensive farming, never declared as such by the European Union, to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), i.e. the major source of financing granted by the EU. The documentary film is a journey to several European states that reveals what lies behind the apparent innocence of our food consumption: a reality made of exploitation of animals and people and land, widespread pollution, damage to biodiversity, use of antibiotics and GMO.

In mid-April, Food for Profit was still in the top ten of the most watched films at the cinema, more than two months after its launch, and has grossed (so far) around 500 thousand euros. And to this must be added the dozens and dozens of free screenings, where there were always full houses. Raise your hand if you would have predicted only a quarter of these numbers at the end of February, when the docufilm was launched through an effective communication campaign. Let's say it clearly: if there is still too little attention to the environment in Italy and animal rights are mistreated every day, anti-speciesism is a topic opposed even by comrades. Imagining that such a documentary film could achieve such attention would have been an exercise in science fiction. This alone should make us reflect. Because Food for profit confronts us with our impotence. Faced with the theses of those who maintain that people are tired, increasingly inactive and selfish and numbed by social media, it will now be possible to oppose the mass phenomenon of a documentary film that manages to extract itself from the niche precisely because it chooses to tell in a powerful and direct way what concerns us, all of us, managing to intercept our daily life made up of lazy purchases of butchered meat at the supermarket. It does so by lashing out clearly against the European institutions, undermining the thesis of a certain progressive left for which "only Europe can save us". The documentary film, which at certain moments recalls the best Michael Moore (do you remember him?), then makes three requests which reveal its character of "civil commitment": the establishment of citizen assemblies to choose where to channel public money; a moratorium to stop the construction of new intensive farms; the stop to public subsidies for intensive farming.

Food for profit was written, filmed and "interpreted" by the journalist Giulia Innocenzi. Known for having worked on a couple of Michele Santoro's TV programmes, she then moved on to Le Iene and Report, maintaining and refining a journalistic style made up of aggressive tenacity, a camera focused more on her own face than on that of the people interviewed, attentive reporting also to style as well as content. In Food for profit Innocenzi elevates the characteristics that have made it famous to the nth degree. First of all, it focuses on the accessibility of the topic, giving a 5-year journalistic investigation a cinematic feel that alternates subjective shots and contextual interviews with clear infographics, explanatory drawings and grainy films that testify, through the help of hidden cameras, the terrible suffering imposed on animals. The docufilm maintains rhythm and tension even when it supports the narcissism of Innocenzi herself: always in the foreground, with the vigilante attitude of someone who solves things alone and is the only one to oppose the plans of power. Although the documentary film is supported by LAV, the historic animal rights association, and although its communication is entrusted to a young person from the Last Generation, no space is left for them in the documentary, with Innocenzi limiting himself to having these entities participate in the screenings collective (not even all of them), as if to illuminate them with reflected light, his own, incapable of stepping aside. In a critical piece with the ambitious title "In Food for Profit there are all the wrong ways of doing environmentalism today", the journalist Ferdinando Cotugno defines it as "a populist manifesto". Reinforcing the idea that in this little Italy worn out by controversies that tomorrow we will forget what matters is positioning. Here, however, we are interested in the result. Food for profit is a tool that can allow us to make ourselves known to those who would never speak to us, to broaden the anti-capitalist reasoning that can be barely understood in the documentary film, to savor the requests of those who have perhaps become depoliticised, or have never been political, by providing us the missing connections. Nothing else matters. It doesn't matter that Giulia Innocenzi is basically a daddy's girl who studied at Luiss, because even from the bourgeois something good can come out. It doesn't matter that his journalism is a thesis and that indeed, in some places, it is not even technically journalism but rather a staging, as when he subjects some MEPs to phantom experiments involving six-legged pigs and which however serves to aim the finger on the real genetic selection of animals, making us wonder what might happen if such extreme points were reached in the future. It doesn't matter that you put big industry, owners and workers together in the same cauldron (to whom you however dedicate in my opinion the most successful part of the docu-film),failing to distinguish the different responsibilities. His weaknesses should not be distracting. Food for profit should be considered as a starting point, an entertainment tool on which to model paths of activism and militancy. He has plowed the ground, now it's our turn to sow.

Andrea Turco

https://www.sicilialibertaria.it/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center