A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, CNT-AIT: Anarchosyndicalisme #186 - About Education (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 28 May 2024 08:14:44 +0300


The article "Doing with the school for our anarchist project" published in AS 185 called for a debate. Here is my contribution to the start of the debate. ---- 1. Education concerns every person. ---- Each of us has had, has or will have a personal experience with the educational institution. It is often even the emotional relationship that we have, or have had, with it, which constructs our representation of the school system, which often implies that people who have felt excluded or who have been excluded, continue to being, as citizens, leaving the field open to the "experts" who would be the politicians who also do without those who have expertise: the teachers!

I believe that education must be one of the primary concerns that anarchosyndicalists must take head on. Debate and build proposals around the meaning of a coherent educational project consistent with their emancipatory and libertarian aspirations.

2. While Blanquer is no longer a minister, but his reform is being applied and is growing more and more every day, which parents are aware of the phases of student recycling induced by "Parcoursup" which also allows 10% high school graduates to be deprived of access to higher education when obtaining the Baccalaureate gives them this right?

Who knows that at the start of the school year, selective sorting will be implemented from the sixth and fifth grades of middle school through level groups and will be prepared from elementary school, to continue in high school? Who will be in the blue bin?

Who knows that at least 23% of people who "teach" children are contract workers without training, recruited at best by France Travail, but also by the classified ads websites "Le Bon Coin" and others of the same ilk? Example: in a college in Haute-Garonne, at the start of the school year, a contract worker taught technology. Today, he teaches history at the same college!

Personally, I am not able to say here, on what basis these contract workers are recruited, but, I am able to affirm that each time a parent, a student thinks he is speaking to a teacher, he must First ask yourself who he's dealing with!

In short, currently, the government is trying to put an adult in front of a class, not necessarily a teacher.
Did you know? Since Blanquer, 12,000 qualified teaching positions have been closed!

3. Through his training, the teacher acquires expertise on the pedagogy(ies), on the management of a necessarily heterogeneous class, on the knowledge of the resources to be put in place so that the child becomes a student, it is that is to say that he is able to learn for himself and in cooperation with others... This basic training is itself increasingly reduced in duration and in favor of formatting recipes for both knowledge and 'to be's rather than to be's know-how.
4. The educational project of liberal economy is increasingly linked to employers' demands: it is a question of ensuring an ever larger and more flexible reservoir of precarious workers, poorly educated to think, that is to say capable to criticize, to create alone and collectively, and, ultimately, to collectively imagine another future and build it. Imposing social determinism and republican merit is therefore a good way to avoid collective struggle.

5. For me, private contract education has no place in a national education project, but it is still part of the problem. For information, private schools are financed at least 75% by the state and local authorities.: Teacher salaries, operating cost per student, various subsidies ranging from the renovation or even construction of premises to participation in specific "educational" projects. This financing of private schools deprives public education of the means of its primary mission of educating all, for the benefit of a single selective mission.

In addition, the state finances 90% of the training of private sector personnel, itself 96% Catholic, and this training "free" from any state control in its content is only subject to the agreement of the diocese.!

6. Militarize youth: Universal National Service will be generalized during school hours. What we have seen from the experiments is frightening: Young people from secondary schools and even from some primary classes are learning, in fatigues and in the school establishment, how to do arm locks and put bracelets/handcuffs on their classmates . Of course, through joy, play and laughter, everyone learns to submit to the authority in uniform and to submit their friend to the authority given by the uniform while learning to "detect" the offender, the terrorist! When the violence of the uniform is legitimized at school, by the framework of the SNU, it is because we have already crossed the limit of respect for individual conscience and we are already in the process of telling, of write another very inspired story, this one about "marshal here we come"!

Macron-Attal-Belloubet have just released the compulsory company internship in second grade. If the young person and their family have a network, the young person will be able to find a host company to carry them out. If his family has a network and money, he can do it abroad. If, despite all these possibilities, the student does not find anything, he or she can do an SNU internship instead of the company internship!!! Which students are going to do SNU instead of the company internship? What is the proportion of private and public students who will do the SNU internship?

Finally, what is the meaning of this "U" for universal? It is above all a misinterpretation: This "Universal" is national, even nationalist and goes against freedom of conscience which, as a universal value, must be exercised, as a human right, on the whole planet. Unless, as a good imperialist dictatorship, France asks for an SNU across the entire planet... Well, it is true that many "democracies" already use their in-house SNU to contain young people who could rebel. (Greece, Finland, Denmark, Austria, Estonia, Norway, Cyprus, Russia, Switzerland, Ukraine, Israel, and 85 other countries not included in the totalitarian republics in which the militarization of youth is constitutive of the regime.)

Here, in short, and without elaboration, are some of the questions that I would like to see addressed in a forum on education, which could lead to a brochure.

Josette, Montauban

https://cntaittoulouse.lautre.net/spip.php?article1390
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center