A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #348 - Politics, General Information Statement: Democratic and financial issues (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Fri, 10 May 2024 10:03:08 +0300


Continuing the Macron method of the Estates General which serves no purpose, the Estates General of Information opened in October 2023 for conclusions in June 2024. Without any illusions about the seriousness of the consultation, the stakes are nevertheless considerable. A handful of billionaires and two banks control most of the media groups (press, radio and television). And technological changes increase the risks of contradictory information disappearing. However, real pluralism is the basis of a real democracy.
Numerous laws and regulations govern the written press and its rich subsidies. Others manage radio and television: allocation of channels, control of content... Those who share the advertising pie are as complex as the rights and duties of journalists: defamation, protection of sources... So when the government announces that it will "modernize" everything, professionals rush to defend their pre-requirements and citizens must closely monitor the consequences on democracy. Especially since the development of digital platforms, algorithms and artificial intelligence poses new problems in the choice of information highlighted, in the automatic reproduction of dominant ideas and the production of false news.

We know nothing of Macron's plans, other than the reaffirmation of the owner's right to choose the editorial line of the media he owns. The same thinking is being done in Brussels. The European "Committee" which monitors the audiovisual sector is broadening its powers to the written press by strengthening its prerogatives: on the secrecy of sources and cybersurveillance of the media in the name of "national security", on the concentration of the media, on the removal of content in the name of fighting external interference. Which amounts to the formalization of censorship which will also sanction "revolutionary" opinions when the day comes.

States General of the Independent Press
A counter-initiative has been built around Mediapart: the Estates General of the Independent Press. Around a hundred media outlets produced 59 measures, presented on November 30 in Paris in front of a thousand people then presented in decentralized meetings. Libertarian Alternative is associated with this dynamic despite the limits of the document because it contains a number of interesting demands, against the concentration of the media or on the protection of sources and the independence of the editorial staff. This document is nevertheless very marked by corporatist demands (press aid reserved for media employing professional journalists) and by an illusion about journalistic ethics whose independence would be sufficient for the impartiality of information.

In his long speech, Edwy Plenel hit the nail on the head by contrasting news media and opinion media. Should we then burn the political and trade union, cultural, literary, associative and scientific press which relies on volunteers or experts and academics, a press which represents an important part of real pluralism? Should we believe in the concept of journalistic neutrality? However, the allocation of the CPPAP number[1]which allows access to certain aid could be reserved only for media hiring professional journalists. This would cause a massacre and Alternative Libertaire would be among the victims.

For organized pluralism (no one can channel us)
Freedom of expression is a key concept for a self-governing society. Revolutionaries have been torn apart over these questions since the banning of "Versailles" newspapers by the Paris Commune in 1871! But apart from hateful and discriminatory calls, nothing should prevent all opinions from finding their media echo in the intellectual, political and democratic debate.

To fight against the authoritarian tendencies of any State, we remain defenders of the absolute freedom to create a media. But in a capitalist regime, freedom is always that of the market. Defending true pluralism requires a public service organized and financed by the community. To defend the pluralism of the press at the Liberation, France had put in place an egalitarian and cooperative system of distribution of newspapers so that they could all be presented to readers in an equal manner. We demand the restoration of this now misguided system, as well as its extension to shared printing and distribution tools (kiosks and subscribers) for titles contributing to the pluralism of political, artistic, union, philosophical and scientific opinions without advertising. . The same institution should be created to counter the weight of GAFAM in the dematerialized distribution of information.

Faced with Bolloré and the fascist excesses of the media of the Catholic-traditionalist industrialist, the Council of State summons Arcom[2]to establish stricter standards for counting speaking times to include not only political guests but also the "editorialists" and other "experts" who are in fact activists. It is better than nothing but does not ensure true pluralism guaranteeing the expression of minorities. When will we see libertarian communists at 8 p.m.? When will there be a libertarian TV channel? "Internal pluralism" or the guaranteed expression of all currents of ideas in a media is in practice a compromise between center right and center left! We must claim "external pluralism" with equal means for all currents of thought to express themselves. And therefore essential public funding in the face of the confiscation of the media by billionaires.

Finally, the States General of Information should also address the growing precariousness of employees in the media industries: freelancers, self-employed in graphics and correction, convicts in press distribution... but that is complete silence.

Jean-Yves (UCL Limousin)

For further:
States-general-information.fr
Fondspresselibre.org
Acrimed.org/Medias-francais-qui-possesde-quoi
Arcom.fr

To validate

[1]The Joint Commission for Publications and Press Agencies, made up of State representatives and press professionals.

[2]The Regulatory Authority for Audiovisual and Digital Communication, the result of the merger of the CSA and Hadopi on January 1, 2022.

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Etats-generaux-de-l-information-Des-enjeux-democratiques-et-financiers
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center