A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, OCL CA #337 - The right to abortion, an incessant feminist fight (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:29:03 +0200


Access to voluntary termination of pregnancy (abortion) or maintaining this access have, in recent years, been at the heart of numerous feminist mobilizations around the world. We have seen this in Latin America, in Poland... and now in the United States. Nothing surprising in this, since women claim through this means and that of contraception the right to give birth or not according to their choice, while the supporters of the capitalist and patriarchal system continue to want to control their sexuality and use their procreative capacities for political, economic or military purposes.

On June 24, 2022, we could read in the French press findings such as: "Access to abortion remains very unequal around the world (1). While one in four pregnancies ends in abortion, more than 40% of women of childbearing age live in states with restrictive laws.»
On June 24, 2022, in fact, the Supreme Court in the United States buried the so-called Roe vs Wade decision (dating from 1973), on which a right to abortion was based which applied to the entire country. Since the Dobbs ruling, each state in the Union can adopt its own legislation on this issue, and therefore possibly decide to make abortion illegal.
Such a change has therefore highlighted the fragility of access to abortion, and sparked many media reports on it.
Certainly, a number of states have legalized abortion in recent years: Ireland in 2018, New Zealand and Argentina in 2020, Thailand in 2021, Colombia and Benin in 2022, Mexico in 2023... Only around twenty countries still completely prohibit it - especially in Africa (for example Egypt, Senegal, Madagascar or Mauritania) and in Latin America (Suriname, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, etc.) . In Europe, abortion is completely prohibited only in Malta, Andorra and the Vatican.
But the decision of the US Supreme Court was all the more striking because it echoed another fairly recent one, taken by the Constitutional Court in Poland in October 2020. Abortion then became almost illegal in this country. country, because this high authority (closely controlled by the conservative party PiS) removed the possibility of resorting to it in the event of fetal malformation. Abortion remains authorized in cases of rape, incest, or if the pregnancy presents a danger to the mother... but malformation of the fetus was the criterion used for more than 95% of the 1,000 legal abortions performed each year in Poland.
Over the last two decades, around fifty states around the world have made their legislation less restrictive regarding abortion, but in some the criteria which authorize the act remain few. Thus, a woman's life must be in danger in Ivory Coast, Libya, South Sudan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Bangladesh, Burma, Guatemala ... And, in Brazil or Chile, the pregnancy must be linked to rape, be at risk for the mother or the fetus must have a serious malformation.
And then, in a state like Italy, abortion is made very difficult to access by the conscientious objection that gynecologists very often use: in 2019, according to the Ministry of Health, 67% of they refused to perform an abortion there.
Finally, in other countries where abortion is legalized, the cost of the medical procedure, distorted preliminary interviews or compulsory waiting periods constitute all obstacles to its implementation.

Winning the right to abortion, an issue for women
Access to abortion is an old feminist fight of international importance because, with access to contraception, it helps women to have control over their bodies, and because the approximately 25 million "Dangerous abortions (2)" practiced every year on Earth - mainly in developing countries (3) - make it the third cause of maternal mortality. Women who abort in such conditions generally do not have the means to travel abroad or seek treatment in a private establishment.
Also the feminist coordinations which have emerged in many countries over the last eight years, in the wake of the Argentine movement Ni Una Menos ("Not one less"), are mainly mobilized on both access against abortion and against violence against women.
The choice to make September 28 the Day for the Right to Abortion for Women in Latin America and the Caribbean dates back to 1990 (it was made during the fifth Latin American Feminist Meetings).
As for the feminist coordination called Czarny Protest ("Black Protest"), it appeared in Poland in 2016: on October 3 (called "Black Monday") of that year, between 100,000 and 200,000 women went on strike and demonstrated in 147 cities against the restriction of the right to abortion sought by the government. This mobilization continued in the following years, and especially after abortion was declared unconstitutional: 430,000 people demonstrated in 410 cities on October 28, 2020, and 100,000 during the Great March to Warsaw on the 30th. , to denounce the power, but also the Catholic hierarchy, particularly powerful and reactionary in Poland. And, because it attacked patriarchal institutions by demanding both a secular state and the suppression of religious education in schools, Czarny Protest faced fierce repression (4).
Since then, informal abortion support networks have multiplied in Poland, feminist NGOs are overwhelmed by requests (5), and the Czech Republic has become a very frequent destination for abortion, due to the fact that the cost of abortion The act is quite moderate (the equivalent of EUR420 on average). However, surveys of the Polish population indicate that two-thirds of them are now in favor of legalizing abortion up to the twelfth week of pregnancy.

Banning the right to abortion, a challenge for those in power
The demographic situation of a country can lead its leaders to consider the right to abortion for women as an annoying obstacle in relation to their economic or even military objectives; it can encourage them to limit it, or even make it disappear - just like contraception or other measures curbing their current pronatalist policies (see box). And, of course, the capitalist and patriarchal system needs generational renewal in order to satisfy its labor needs for its gigantic global market.
In Russia, the speeches that leaders have been making on the family since last fall are enlightening (6). To encourage women to leave the work they do outside the home and to have children, because the population is decreasing (7), they highlight Russian "traditional values", but also attack the right to 'Abortion.
This right, which was acquired in 1920, has been maintained until now, despite some temporary prohibitions. But last summer the Minister of Health, Mikhail Mourashko, spoke of "a perverse trend (...) according to which women should first receive an education, have a career and ensure their material well-being before 'taking care of having children' - and he called for stricter control over the sale of molecules allowing medical abortions to be carried out. At the beginning of November, it was Vladimir Putin himself who, during a meeting with members of "civil society", mentioned abortion as "an acute problem" in relation to the demographic situation - which is a central theme for him since he came to power in 2000.
The Duma health committee, immediately afterwards, adopted recommendations aimed at restricting the right to abortion: reduction of the legal period from twelve to eight weeks; consent required from husband if woman is married; extension of the mandatory reflection period, with the equally obligatory condition of "listening to the fetal heartbeat"...
The regions of Mordovia, Tver and Kaliningrad have banned "incitement to abortion" and have made liable to fines; and the Federation Council, the upper house of the Russian Parliament, proposed that a law extend the measure to the entire country.
In other regions (such as Crimea), dozens of private clinics have given up "on their own" - according to the authorities - from performing abortions to "make their contribution to the demographic edifice". The President of the Duma immediately tabled a bill which, if passed, would oblige all private clinics on Russian territory to do the same. And, according to testimonies from pregnant women, doctors in public hospitals are increasingly seeking to dissuade women from having an abortion.
Of course, the war in Ukraine undoubtedly contributes to worsening the demographic situation, by sending millions of men of childbearing age to the front or into exile; but it is also the defense of the homeland which incites the Russian power to attack the right to abortion. According to Le Monde, posters from an Orthodox foundation can be found in several Russian cities on which a fetus (sic!) says to a soldier: "Defend me now, I will defend you later.» Various personalities are playing this "family-fatherland" card - and MP Valery Seleznev proposed, in mid-November, that imprisoned women could have special permission to procreate... with the key being their release if they become pregnant.

Access to abortion as an electoral asset
As the November 2024 presidential election in the United States looms, the suppression of the constitutional right to abortion clearly divides the Republican and Democratic camps. Because the Republican candidates promise to further restrict this right, while the Democratic candidates have made it their hobby horse, after noting that it constitutes the first criterion of choice in this election for a growing part of the electorate (8).
It must be said that the possibility of abortion in the United States has deteriorated significantly: 14 states out of 50 have to date completely abolished the right to abortion; 6 others radically restrict it, often from six weeks of pregnancy. And the Supreme Court, with a conservative majority, must decide before June 2024 on the subject of the abortion pill, which is used for more than half of abortions and whose prescription had been made easier in recent years (9).
Most of the local American decision-makers who, for the past year, have sought to completely ban access to abortion are men from the Republican Party (1,300 out of just under 1,600); but two thirds of the population are in favor of maintaining this right, and women are particularly determined to defend it with their vote. Since the Roe vs. Wade decision, the Republicans have lost in every election where access to abortion has been a question; the Democratic Party takes advantage of it, aware that this issue acts like a slow poison on the Republican Party by delivering it to its most extremist current. We also see Democratic figures advocating the adoption at the federal level of a law guaranteeing the right to abortion - like the 13 states (including Ohio[10]) and the District of Columbia which do so. did at their level.

President Macron therefore hardly innovated when he announced in France, on October 29, 2023, that a draft constitutional law aimed at protecting abortion would be presented to the Council of Ministers before the end of 2023 (11).
Macron committed on March 8, 2022, during the "controversial" tribute to Gisèle Halimi, to "change our Constitution in order to enshrine the freedom of women to resort to voluntary termination of pregnancy". Then the Chamber of Deputies voted by an overwhelming majority, in November, for a bill "constitutionalizing" abortion; and, in February 2023, the Senate approved this proposal by a narrow majority, but after replacing the "right" of women to resort to abortion with the word "freedom".
To bring this constitutional revision to fruition, Macron chose the path of the two Chambers meeting in Congress in Versailles (this Congress being scheduled for March 5, according to the former Minister of Solidarity and Families Combe), rather than that of the referendum: he wants to avoid offering a platform to opponents of abortion (12) and thinks it will be easier to win with this process. The constitutional revision must, however, be approved by three-fifths of parliamentarians. However, if in the National Assembly the presidential majority and the left should logically support it, in the Senate it is less obvious since the LR group is in the majority there... and then the position of the National Rally remains unknown. Marine Le Pen is so unsure of her troops that she ended up presenting an amendment in her name alone, which defends... the current law on abortion that she previously contested (13).
Furthermore, during his press conference on January 16, 2024, Macron promised a "major fight plan" against "male and female" infertility (describing it as a "scourge" and "taboo of the century") in the perspective of a "demographic rearmament" of France, whose birth rate is falling.

The evolution of government decisions or speeches concerning abortion, here and there, highlights, as we can see, a reality: this hard-won right is no more acquired than any other. We must therefore continue to mobilize everywhere to defend it.

Vanina

Notes
1. "Right to abortion: in which countries is it prohibited, restricted or threatened?"», Le Monde, June 24, 2022.
2. The WHO defines them as acts carried out "by people who do not have adequate qualifications or taking place in an environment that does not comply with minimum medical standards, or in both circumstances ".
3. According to Amnesty International, "access to modern contraceptive methods, comprehensive sexuality education and safe and legal abortion services reduces the abortion rate" - read "Key facts on abortion» on his site.
4. 79 arrests were violently carried out on October 25, 2020 during actions carried out against the Catholic Church, which is quite rare in Western Europe.
5. "One year after the virtual ban on abortion in Poland, "abortion without borders" is thriving", Le Monde, November 1, 2021.
6. "In Russia, the right to abortion attacked and curtailed background of demographic decline", Le Monde, November 28, 2023.
7. According to the statistical agency Rosstat, Russia has fewer inhabitants, including annexed Crimea, than in 1999.
8. "Abortion: "In the United States United, one year after Dobbs, this right remains a crucial issue in the 2024 presidential election," Le Monde, July 4, 2023.
9. The ban on this pill would open the way to that of medications such as hormonal treatments, contraceptives or vaccines, and other restrictions on individual freedoms, such as civil rights.
10. "The right to abortion, the winning electoral standard of American Democrats", Le Monde, November 8, 2023.
11. "Emmanuel Macron initiates the process aimed at including abortion in the Constitution", Le Monde, 30 October 2023.
12. On their intense propaganda activity aimed at young people via social networks, read "Disinformation from opponents of abortion threatens the right to abortion, warns the Women's Foundation", Franceinfo, January 18, 2024 13.
Only 38 RN deputies out of a total of 89 voted for the inclusion of abortion in the Constitution, during the first vote in the Assembly. "On abortion, Marine Le Pen changes position and proposes to constitutionalize the Veil law", Le Monde, November 22, 2022.

<quote>New dilemma for the Chinese authorities: too many old people and not enough young people!
China lost 2 million inhabitants in 2023: it has "only" 1.41 billion inhabitants on its continental territory, and, according to the UN, India is now the most populous country in the world (1). The slowdown in China's birth rate is due to several reasons: the high cost of education; a lack of confidence in the economic future; a growing distrust of the institution of marriage (a necessary step to have children); higher education that a growing number of women are doing and which is delaying the age of first pregnancy.
The Chinese government is striving to limit demographic decline through (modest) family allowances, through (strong) communication in favor of the birth rate... and - since 2021 - through the authorization given to all couples to have three children . China is indeed faced with the aging of its population, which can slow down the country's economic growth and call into question its ability to provide for the needs of its inhabitants. In addition, the tradition of caring for elderly parents is more respected in Chinese society than in Western societies; but as a couple is generally made up of two adults and only children, they have a lot to do if their four elderly parents are dependent on them.

1. "China affected by a drop in its population for the second consecutive year", Le Monde, January 17, 2024.

http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4077
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center