A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #345 - Politics, Dupont-Moretti: Exceptional justice... exceptionally lenient! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:32:13 +0200


The Minister of Justice, Eric Dupont-Moretti, was found guilty by the Court of Justice of the Republic of illegal taking of interest... without the intention having been proven! After months of procrastination against this unfair justice, good law has finally prevailed. Bourgeois justice has exonerated one of its lackeys while more and more severity is demanded, in the name of setting an example, for the young, and the less young, of the working classes. ---- On November 29, 2023, Eric Dupont-Moretti, Minister of Justice, was acquitted by the Court of Justice of the Republic (CJR), when he was accused of having used his position as minister to "settle scores" with magistrates with whom he had disagreements dating back to when he was a lawyer.

The CJR's decision is motivated by the fact that if the material element of the offense of illegal taking of interest is present, the intentional element would not be demonstrated. Hear: he did it, but we have no proof that he intended to do it.

Such reasoning is entirely possible legally. And moreover, the criminal judge should, each time he sentences a person, ensure that he has proof not only that he committed the offense, but also that he had the intention to do so.

In fact, when the accused person is not a minister, we rather see opposite situations, of convictions without proof of the material element.

Tailor-made justice
The CJR, an exceptional jurisdiction to judge offenses committed by ministers in office, made up of 15 judges including 12 parliamentarians, before which victims cannot intervene, and which has records of impunity (in 20 years of existence, more than 20,000 complaints registered, 9 judgments, 5 convictions, all suspended), is undoubtedly the most striking symbol of this bourgeois justice, at two levels, which serves the interests of the dominant.

The law is a balance of power
Because, it must be remembered, "Justice", in France, essentially condemns people from the working classes, racialized, from neighborhoods, disabled... The racist and classist biases of the judges, mainly white and from the bourgeoisie , undoubtedly have a lot to do with it, but the problem is much more deeply rooted in the institutions.

The sociology of domination demonstrates that contrary to what is said to us, the law is not the expression of the general will, but results from the balance of power between social classes to conquer the power to state the law. It therefore reflects the interests and values of the group which has gained this power, and which uses it to criminalize behavior which threatens its dominant position[1].

Thus, the ruling bourgeoisie creates legislation and a penal system which targets offenses such as theft or drugs much more than the behavior of big bosses destroying the environment or endangering the safety of their employees, for example.

Thus, the ruling bourgeoisie creates legislation and a penal system which targets offenses such as theft or drugs much more than the behavior of big bosses destroying the environment or endangering the safety of their employees, for example.

At the same time, the penal system projects an image of danger that the poor represent, and has the function of hiding the real social dangers that are the crimes of the powerful.

Contrary to the dominant discourse on the fight against delinquency, this penal system is perfectly efficient and fulfills the real objectives for which it was designed, and is, therefore, not reformable. From a libertarian perspective, it seems essential to seek its abolition, and to be interested in non-punitive justice alternatives.

Julie (UCL Fougères)

To validate
[1]See Pierre Bourdieu, "The force of law. Elements for a sociology of the legal field", Proceedings of research in social sciences, n° 64, September 1986 and Austin Turk, Criminality and Legal Order, Rand McNally, 1969.

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Dupont-Moretti-Une-justice-d-exception-exceptionnellement-clemente
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center