|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Francais_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkurkish_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, UCL AL #345 - Politics, Dupont-Moretti: Exceptional justice... exceptionally lenient! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sat, 10 Feb 2024 09:32:13 +0200
The Minister of Justice, Eric Dupont-Moretti, was found guilty by the
Court of Justice of the Republic of illegal taking of interest...
without the intention having been proven! After months of
procrastination against this unfair justice, good law has finally
prevailed. Bourgeois justice has exonerated one of its lackeys while
more and more severity is demanded, in the name of setting an example,
for the young, and the less young, of the working classes. ---- On
November 29, 2023, Eric Dupont-Moretti, Minister of Justice, was
acquitted by the Court of Justice of the Republic (CJR), when he was
accused of having used his position as minister to "settle scores" with
magistrates with whom he had disagreements dating back to when he was a
lawyer.
The CJR's decision is motivated by the fact that if the material element
of the offense of illegal taking of interest is present, the intentional
element would not be demonstrated. Hear: he did it, but we have no proof
that he intended to do it.
Such reasoning is entirely possible legally. And moreover, the criminal
judge should, each time he sentences a person, ensure that he has proof
not only that he committed the offense, but also that he had the
intention to do so.
In fact, when the accused person is not a minister, we rather see
opposite situations, of convictions without proof of the material element.
Tailor-made justice
The CJR, an exceptional jurisdiction to judge offenses committed by
ministers in office, made up of 15 judges including 12 parliamentarians,
before which victims cannot intervene, and which has records of impunity
(in 20 years of existence, more than 20,000 complaints registered, 9
judgments, 5 convictions, all suspended), is undoubtedly the most
striking symbol of this bourgeois justice, at two levels, which serves
the interests of the dominant.
The law is a balance of power
Because, it must be remembered, "Justice", in France, essentially
condemns people from the working classes, racialized, from
neighborhoods, disabled... The racist and classist biases of the judges,
mainly white and from the bourgeoisie , undoubtedly have a lot to do
with it, but the problem is much more deeply rooted in the institutions.
The sociology of domination demonstrates that contrary to what is said
to us, the law is not the expression of the general will, but results
from the balance of power between social classes to conquer the power to
state the law. It therefore reflects the interests and values of the
group which has gained this power, and which uses it to criminalize
behavior which threatens its dominant position[1].
Thus, the ruling bourgeoisie creates legislation and a penal system
which targets offenses such as theft or drugs much more than the
behavior of big bosses destroying the environment or endangering the
safety of their employees, for example.
Thus, the ruling bourgeoisie creates legislation and a penal system
which targets offenses such as theft or drugs much more than the
behavior of big bosses destroying the environment or endangering the
safety of their employees, for example.
At the same time, the penal system projects an image of danger that the
poor represent, and has the function of hiding the real social dangers
that are the crimes of the powerful.
Contrary to the dominant discourse on the fight against delinquency,
this penal system is perfectly efficient and fulfills the real
objectives for which it was designed, and is, therefore, not reformable.
From a libertarian perspective, it seems essential to seek its
abolition, and to be interested in non-punitive justice alternatives.
Julie (UCL Fougères)
To validate
[1]See Pierre Bourdieu, "The force of law. Elements for a sociology of
the legal field", Proceedings of research in social sciences, n° 64,
September 1986 and Austin Turk, Criminality and Legal Order, Rand
McNally, 1969.
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Dupont-Moretti-Une-justice-d-exception-exceptionnellement-clemente
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Sicilia Libertaria: NO MUOS - Free Gaza and Palestine (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) France, OCL CA #336 - Who is afraid of anti-industrial criticism? by Saint-Nazaire (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center