|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Francais_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkurkish_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Sicilia Libertaria: Agri-food and Food Sovereignty - the bluff of made in Italy (Part two) (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:13:40 +0200
The 2023 "State of the World" report by FAO and "Power shift" by the
"Global alliance for the future" reveal the hidden costs of industrial
food systems: 12,700 billion dollars, equal to a third of global GDP,
for 70% caused by health effects: it is the cost of living.
Agroindustrial food is the commodity that devours us. ---- Not only.
The study published in June 2023 in the authoritative journal
"Environmental research letter" analyzes 58 years of data on the
climate, production and income of 109 crops in 127 countries and
concludes that "a greater diversity of crops reduces the negative
impacts of droughts and high temperatures on crops, increases resilience
to weather and soil conditions". 41 thousand animal and plant species
are at risk of extinction. (Source: Crop diversity buffers the impact of
droughts and high temperatures on food production; iucn.org)
Nonetheless, the EU supports high-yield agriculture per hectare
(intensive monoculture) with the fake that it will free up land for
biodiversity at the same time as solving the problem of world hunger
(which is instead inequality in access to food): "in Europe, we will be
able to return 75% of our agricultural surface to nature without this
leading to cold winters, food and economic scarcity", said the Dutch MEP
Nilufer Gundogan: it is the techno-optimism which, with the theory of
soil saving, states that increasing productivity favors the protection
of biodiversity, according to the principle of sustainable
intensification in agriculture. On the contrary, land sharing
presupposes a widespread, non-intensive agricultural model that promotes
biodiversity within the cultivated areas; biodiversity depends on
complex interactions between the different types of land use, the use of
which cannot be delimited within fences: an insect, a pollinator, knows
no artificial boundaries and its ability to survive is determined by the
biodiversity conditions of the land cultivated and non-cultivated. The
high use of pesticides and herbicides, in increasing quantities every
year to ensure high productivity, causes the local and permanent
extinction of living things in cultivated areas and through the
contamination of air and water the extinction spreads everywhere. In
European protected areas there is a 75% reduction in the biomass of
flying insects and proportionally of insectivorous birds due to
contamination from toxic cultivated environments. The story telling of
high-yield agriculture is the narrative of the endless hunt for profit.
On the contrary, a non-extractive, organic agriculture, based on
the ecology of not only plant populations and agrobiodiversity, is not a
cultivation method but a community of the territory resulting from a
radical social transformation that abolishes the agrarian individualism
of private land ownership and returns Agriculture to the community as a
common good, whose activity is a cognitive-productive work shared by the
whole society which thus exercises the right to knowledge and generates
food sovereignty, or the ability to be the guardian of biodiversity and
environmental heritage, of an agroecology based on complexity, on the
right to food security and access to food, on energy control exercised
with delegation to farmers. The rejection of monoculture in the field in
favor of agricultural diversity mirrors the overcoming of the capitalist
dogma of one-dimensional progress of not only agricultural models, of
technical, cultural, economic and social uniformity and uniqueness.
Food sovereignty has as its incipit the cognitive, reproductive and
collective ownership re-appropriation of seeds, their free exchange and
genetic adaptation to environmental conditions; collective ownership and
free trade are now prohibited by law, peasant seeds confined to the
registers of conservation varieties and genome banks. By seeds we do not
mean those of the multinational seed companies as they are created and
produced specifically for industrial agriculture, but we mean the seeds
of traditional varieties, the result of centuries-old adaptations,
resilient and adaptive to the changing conditions of the territory: "due
to cross-breeding and selection natural, the genetic composition of the
traditional organic seed harvested at the end of the season is never the
same as that sown, so the population evolves by progressively adapting
to the environment in which it grows." (Salvatore Ceccarelli - Stefania
Grando, geneticists, Sowing the future, Giunti Ed. 2019). Seeds are the
basis of the food supply chain since food comes from seeds and our
health is derived from the quality of food. Whoever owns them controls life.
Food sovereignty implies another social way of understanding the
Territory, which is no longer the geographical space defined by
political-administrative borders where a public body exercises its
authority, the place where the inhabitants carry out activities, profits
and profits, from which they extract materials and products. The
Territory is a natural subject part of an ineliminable world of life
relationships of the local community. It is an eco-systemic unit within
which environmental resources and their users are integrated so that the
forms of a balanced and inseparable totality are created. The territory
is the subject of Rights through communities, another way of possessing
where properties are inalienable, indivisible, non-inheritable. The
Rights pertain to the object (water, forest, land, etc.) and not to the
subject (natural or legal person), therefore ownership or hierarchical
dominion of the subject over the object is not exercised; the subjects
are only usufructuaries and must guarantee the integrity of the
territory and its resources for future generations. The territory is a
common good, a collective heritage whose governance and management are
based on consensual decisions and the delegation of authority with
direct democracy.
Roberto Brioschi
https://www.sicilialibertaria.it/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) Burma, IWA-YGN: Arbeiterkonvergenz der WSLB: Stärke in der Solidarität in schwierigen Zeiten (ca, en, it, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) France, OCL CA #336 - Case of December 8: an unfair but not surprising judgment (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center