A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Francais_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkurkish_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours

Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, UCL AL #345 - Unionism, Student unionism: Revival or impasse? (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:18:34 +0200


Student unionism is today in full reorganization. Recent years have indeed seen the creation of new unions, the majority of which claim to be militant unionists. Despite this, students have not been a force strongly involved in the mobilizations of the social movement against pension reform. Therefore, does this recomposition show the weaknesses of student activism or does it herald a new dynamic? ---- A recurring feedback from the latest mobilization against pension reform is the low level of investment by students. Although the inter-union has achieved record mobilization figures since 1995, its student counterpart has not been able to show the same level of unity or mobilization. However, since 2019 there has been no shortage of student unions: before 2019 there were two (SESL and UNEF) in 2023 there will be five!

These different organizations present several distinct approaches to student activism. First, the Student Union (EU) places itself in the reformist continuity of the UNEF. The FSE, also from the UNEF, embodies an ideologized and claimed communist line of advantage. The CGT-SELA shows a certain dynamic but this structure suffers from internal divisions leading to the existence of two national entities: the CN-SELA and the UN-SELA.

Finally, Solidaires Étudiants-e-s, (SESL) has struggled to renew itself since 2013. Carrier of self-managing unionism and attached to the Union Syndicale Solidaires, SESL embodied a unionism of struggle against the old UNEF. But today SESL seems to no longer be able to keep up with the new challenges of student unionism.

Solidarity Students overwhelmed
Born from the merger of SUD Student and the first FSE, SESL has since failed to achieve a major victory. While his predecessor SUD student had managed to come out on top in 2006 during the mobilization against the LRU law by being the last to mobilize until the end. SESL has since lacked victory, despite its participation in several student social movements. This can be explained by SESL's inability to adopt a common strategy in the midst of mobilization, leading to having to navigate by sight and leaving local unions to organize on their own.

In addition, there is a deep training problem within SESL, whether it is new activists who do not always follow a basic training cycle or federal/local secretaries who do not need training. have received adequate training to take on responsibilities. Creating many first-time activists at SESL, which is explained, among other things, by the high turnover experienced by student unionism, which leads to the rise of responsibility too quickly, but also by the lack of a strong federal training policy.

Student solidarity
Always looking for your own identity
This lack leads to confusion about what the role of SESL is, with many getting involved in it as if they were in a political organization and not in a union. Student Solidarity also experiences an internal political division that could be illustrated in an "Autonomist vs. Federalist" divide. The two disagree on the nature of SESL's federalism, the "autonomists" defend its decentralism and the autonomy of local unions. While the "federalists" want more centralism and make the federation the main entity of SESL.

This opposition born from a localist withdrawal experienced by a certain number of SESL unions losing interest in federal affairs, this drift only amplifies the structuring problems of the federation while not seeking to resolve them. Indeed, the current functioning of the federation requires active participation of the unions within it and moving away from it leads to a structural blockage which does not make it possible to resolve this divide. Faced with this observation, Student Solidarity will only be able to emerge from this crisis through the victory of one of these lines over the other.

A recomposition of the student activist environment
The student landscape is now as follows: a reformist pole placed under the banner of the EU, product of the fusion of the Alternative and the reformist tendencies of the UNEF and a pole of struggle divided between SESL, the FSE, the UNEF-TACLE and the CGT-SELA. However, these differences are completely invisible, making the proliferation of unions at universities absurd in the eyes of students, who do not understand the interest or the difference between each.

In the absence of real victories, given the limited methods allowed by student unionism, student unions are increasingly seen as left-wing politicized youth associations and not as structures of mutual aid, organization for students facing university. For the 2022-2023 school year, a year of mobilization for youth, SESL claimed... 500 union members (i.e. 0.05% of students). SESL is thus closer to a small group organization than to a union. The first concern of student unionism must be its massification.

Student unionism faces a triple challenge: the profound transformation of the ESR and the student profile with the liberalization of the ESR; the fragmentation of organizations by liberal activism, and the lack of organization of youth in union frameworks.

Some organizations seem to be taking stock of these issues and are beginning unification processes such as the FSE and UN-SELA. Others, like the EU, are taking the gamble of reformism and embracing the dynamics of individual activism. Timorous and torn between these two SESL trends and at a historical crossroads in its development. SESL must be able to reform itself to avoid localist excesses and promote a unifying attitude of union forces rather than a sectarian and liberal attitude and not be confused with a simple youth organization. It must focus on massification and political issues affecting students to create "class" consciousness among them in order to be able to respond effectively as a union in our places of study.

Léora (UCL Nantes), Akhane (UCL Amiens) and Lou G. (UCL Grenoble) from the UCL Youth Commission

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Syndicalisme-etudiant-Le-renouveau-ou-l-impasse
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center