|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 30 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Francais_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkurkish_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours
Links to indexes of first few lines of all posts
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, UCL AL #345 - Unionism, Student unionism: Revival or impasse? (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:18:34 +0200
Student unionism is today in full reorganization. Recent years have
indeed seen the creation of new unions, the majority of which claim to
be militant unionists. Despite this, students have not been a force
strongly involved in the mobilizations of the social movement against
pension reform. Therefore, does this recomposition show the weaknesses
of student activism or does it herald a new dynamic? ---- A recurring
feedback from the latest mobilization against pension reform is the low
level of investment by students. Although the inter-union has achieved
record mobilization figures since 1995, its student counterpart has not
been able to show the same level of unity or mobilization. However,
since 2019 there has been no shortage of student unions: before 2019
there were two (SESL and UNEF) in 2023 there will be five!
These different organizations present several distinct approaches to
student activism. First, the Student Union (EU) places itself in the
reformist continuity of the UNEF. The FSE, also from the UNEF, embodies
an ideologized and claimed communist line of advantage. The CGT-SELA
shows a certain dynamic but this structure suffers from internal
divisions leading to the existence of two national entities: the CN-SELA
and the UN-SELA.
Finally, Solidaires Étudiants-e-s, (SESL) has struggled to renew itself
since 2013. Carrier of self-managing unionism and attached to the Union
Syndicale Solidaires, SESL embodied a unionism of struggle against the
old UNEF. But today SESL seems to no longer be able to keep up with the
new challenges of student unionism.
Solidarity Students overwhelmed
Born from the merger of SUD Student and the first FSE, SESL has since
failed to achieve a major victory. While his predecessor SUD student had
managed to come out on top in 2006 during the mobilization against the
LRU law by being the last to mobilize until the end. SESL has since
lacked victory, despite its participation in several student social
movements. This can be explained by SESL's inability to adopt a common
strategy in the midst of mobilization, leading to having to navigate by
sight and leaving local unions to organize on their own.
In addition, there is a deep training problem within SESL, whether it is
new activists who do not always follow a basic training cycle or
federal/local secretaries who do not need training. have received
adequate training to take on responsibilities. Creating many first-time
activists at SESL, which is explained, among other things, by the high
turnover experienced by student unionism, which leads to the rise of
responsibility too quickly, but also by the lack of a strong federal
training policy.
Student solidarity
Always looking for your own identity
This lack leads to confusion about what the role of SESL is, with many
getting involved in it as if they were in a political organization and
not in a union. Student Solidarity also experiences an internal
political division that could be illustrated in an "Autonomist vs.
Federalist" divide. The two disagree on the nature of SESL's federalism,
the "autonomists" defend its decentralism and the autonomy of local
unions. While the "federalists" want more centralism and make the
federation the main entity of SESL.
This opposition born from a localist withdrawal experienced by a certain
number of SESL unions losing interest in federal affairs, this drift
only amplifies the structuring problems of the federation while not
seeking to resolve them. Indeed, the current functioning of the
federation requires active participation of the unions within it and
moving away from it leads to a structural blockage which does not make
it possible to resolve this divide. Faced with this observation, Student
Solidarity will only be able to emerge from this crisis through the
victory of one of these lines over the other.
A recomposition of the student activist environment
The student landscape is now as follows: a reformist pole placed under
the banner of the EU, product of the fusion of the Alternative and the
reformist tendencies of the UNEF and a pole of struggle divided between
SESL, the FSE, the UNEF-TACLE and the CGT-SELA. However, these
differences are completely invisible, making the proliferation of unions
at universities absurd in the eyes of students, who do not understand
the interest or the difference between each.
In the absence of real victories, given the limited methods allowed by
student unionism, student unions are increasingly seen as left-wing
politicized youth associations and not as structures of mutual aid,
organization for students facing university. For the 2022-2023 school
year, a year of mobilization for youth, SESL claimed... 500 union
members (i.e. 0.05% of students). SESL is thus closer to a small group
organization than to a union. The first concern of student unionism must
be its massification.
Student unionism faces a triple challenge: the profound transformation
of the ESR and the student profile with the liberalization of the ESR;
the fragmentation of organizations by liberal activism, and the lack of
organization of youth in union frameworks.
Some organizations seem to be taking stock of these issues and are
beginning unification processes such as the FSE and UN-SELA. Others,
like the EU, are taking the gamble of reformism and embracing the
dynamics of individual activism. Timorous and torn between these two
SESL trends and at a historical crossroads in its development. SESL must
be able to reform itself to avoid localist excesses and promote a
unifying attitude of union forces rather than a sectarian and liberal
attitude and not be confused with a simple youth organization. It must
focus on massification and political issues affecting students to create
"class" consciousness among them in order to be able to respond
effectively as a union in our places of study.
Léora (UCL Nantes), Akhane (UCL Amiens) and Lou G. (UCL Grenoble) from
the UCL Youth Commission
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Syndicalisme-etudiant-Le-renouveau-ou-l-impasse
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Greece, APO land & freedom:[Victory]Rally against femicide SATURDAY 20/1, AT 19:00 CITY HALL OF KALAMRIA (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Greece, APO land & freedom: Neither State - nor Private University (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center