A-Infos (en) Quebec, The Bonding Properties of Tear Gas

["Viviane Lerner" <vlerner@interpac.net>]

 ________________________________________________
      A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
            http://www.ainfos.ca/
 ________________________________________________

[Editor note:
This was the year *everything* changed.]

> http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0425-01.htm
      Published on Wednesday, April 25, 2001 in the Toronto Globe & Mail
      The Bonding Properties of Tear Gas
      by Naomi Klein

      Maude Barlow, chair of the Council of Canadians, is condemned for not
calling off Maude's Mob. Activist Jaggi Singh is in jail for allegedly
possessing a weapon that he never owned or used -- a theatrical catapult
that shot stuffed animals over the infamous fence in Quebec City during last
weekend's Summit of the Americas.
      It's not just that the police didn't get the joke, it's that they
don't get the new era of political protest, one adapted to our postmodern
times. There was no one person, or group, who could call off "their people,"
because the tens of thousands who came out to protest against the Free Trade
Area of the Americas are part of a movement that doesn't have a leader, a
centre, or even an agreed-on name. Yet it exists, undeniably, nonetheless.

      What is difficult to convey in media reports is that there weren't two
protests that took place in Quebec City -- one a "peaceful" labour march,
the other a "violent" anarchist riot. There were hundreds of protests. One
was organized by a mother and daughter from Montreal. Another by a vanload
of grad students from Edmonton. Another by three friends from Toronto who
aren't members of anything but their health clubs. Yet another by a couple
of waiters from a local café on their lunch break.

      Sure there were well-organized groups in Quebec City: The unions had
buses, matching placards and a parade route; the "black bloc" of anarchists
had gas masks and radio links. But, for days, the streets were also filled
with people who simply said to a friend, "Let's go to Quebec," and with
Quebec City residents who said, "Let's go outside." They didn't join one big
protest, they participated in a moment.

      How could it be otherwise? The traditional institutions that once
organized citizens into neat, structured groups are all in decline: unions,
religions, political parties. Yet something propelled tens of thousands of
individuals to the streets anyway, an intuition, a gut instinct -- perhaps
just the profoundly human desire to be part of something larger than
oneself.

      Did they have their party line together, a detailed dissection of the
ins and outs of the FTAA? Not always. But neither can the Quebec protests be
dismissed as vacuous political tourism. George W. Bush's message at the
summit was that the mere act of buying and selling would do our governing
for us. "Trade helps spread freedom," he said.

      It was precisely this impoverished and passive vision of democracy
that was rejected on the streets outside. Whatever else they were seeking,
all were certainly looking for a taste of direct political participation.
The result of these hundreds of miniature protests converging was chaotic,
sometimes awful, but frequently inspiring. One thing is certain: After
finally shaking off the mantle of political spectatorship, the last thing
these people are about to do is hand over the reins to a cabal of would-be
leaders.

      The protesters, however, will become more organized, a fact that has
more to do with the actions of police than the directives of Maude Barlow,
Jaggi Singh or, for that matter, me. If people wandered and stumbled to
Quebec City, profoundly unsure of what it meant to be part of a political
movement, something united us all once we arrived: mass arrests, rubber
bullets and, most of all, a thick white blanket of gas.

      Despite the Liberal Party line of praising "good" protesters while
condemning "bad" ones, treatment of everyone on the streets of Quebec City
was crude, cowardly and indiscriminate. The security forces used the actions
of a few rock throwers as a camera-friendly justification to do what they
have been trying to do from the start: clear the city of thousands of lawful
protesters because it was more convenient that way.

      Once they got their "provocation," they filled entire neighbourhoods
with toxic fumes, forcing families to breathe through masks in their living
rooms. Frustrated that the wind was against them, they sprayed some more.
People giving the peace sign to the police were gassed. People handing out
food were gassed. I met a 50-year-old woman from Ottawa who told me
cheerfully, "I went out to buy a sandwich and was gassed twice." People
having a party under a bridge were gassed. People protesting against their
friends' arrests were gassed. The first-aid clinic treating people who had
been gassed was gassed.

      Tear gas was supposed to break down the protesters, but it had the
opposite effect: It enraged and radicalized them, enough to cheer for Black
Blockers who dared to throw back the canisters. It may be light and atomized
enough to ride on air, but I suspect the coming months will show that gas
also has powerful bonding properties.

      Nami Klein's website - http://www.nologo.org


                       ********
               The A-Infos News Service
      News about and of interest to anarchists
                       ********
               COMMANDS: lists@ainfos.ca
               REPLIES: a-infos-d@ainfos.ca
               HELP: a-infos-org@ainfos.ca
               WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca
               INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org

 To receive a-infos in one language only mail lists@ainfos.ca the message
                unsubscribe a-infos
                subscribe a-infos-X
 where X = en, ca, de, fr, etc. (i.e. the language code)